Top Banner
Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur Daftar Isi BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN................................................................................. 1-1 BAB 2 METODOLOGI PENYELIDIKAN TANAH.................................... 2-2 2.1 LINGKUP PEKERJAAN .............................................................................. 2-2 2.2 METODOLOGI PENYELIDIKAN TANAH LAPANGAN .................................. 2-2 2.2.1 Pemboran ............................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Pengambilan Contoh Tanah Tidak Terganggu ...................................... 2-3 2.2.3 SPT (Standard Penetration Test) ........................................................... 2-4 2.2.4 DCPT (Dutch Cone Penetration Test)/Sondir ....................................... 2-4 2.3 METODOLOGI PENYELIDIKAN TANAH LABORATORIUM .......................... 2-4 2.3.1 Specific Gravity ...................................................................................... 2-5 2.3.2 Water Content / Moisture Content ......................................................... 2-5 2.3.3 Analisis Saringan dan Hidrometer......................................................... 2-5 2.3.4 Atterberg’s Limit .................................................................................... 2-6 2.3.5 Triaxial-UU ............................................................................................ 2-6 2.3.6 Consolidation Test ................................................................................. 2-6 BAB 3 ANALISIS GEOTEKNIK ................................................................... 3-1 3.1 KLASIFIKASI TANAH ............................................................................. 3-1 3.2 PROFIL LAPISAN TANAH ......................................................................... 3-2 3.3 PARAMETER TANAH ................................................................................ 3-9 3.3.1 Hasil Uji Laboratorium.......................................................................... 3-9 3.3.2 Korelasi Parameter Tanah ................................................................... 3-10 3.4 ANALISIS PENURUNAN 1-D KONSOLIDASI TERZAGHI ........................... 3-11 3.4.1 Immediate atau Elastic Settlement (Si) ................................................ 3-11 3.4.2 Consolidation Settlement (Sc) .............................................................. 3-11 3.4.3 Time Rate Consolidation ...................................................................... 3-12 3.4.4 Hasil Analisis Penurunan Konsolidasi ................................................ 3-13 BAB 4 ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG ............................ 4-1 4.1 KAPASITAS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG .......................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Kapasitas Daya Dukung Aksial Tiang Tunggal ..................................... 4-2 4.1.2 Tahanan Geser Selimut Tiang ................................................................ 4-2 4.1.3 Tahanan Ujung Tiang ............................................................................ 4-3 4.1.4 Kapasitas Tarik Tiang ............................................................................ 4-4 4.1.5 Kapasitas Lateral Tiang Tunggal .......................................................... 4-4 4.2 PENENTUAN PARAMETER ........................................................................ 4-6 4.3 KAPASITAS DAYA DUKUNG IJIN TIANG .................................................. 4-7 4.4 HASIL ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG .................................. 4-8 i
128

Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Jun 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Widyo Lesmono
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Daftar Isi

BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN.................................................................................1-1

BAB 2 METODOLOGI PENYELIDIKAN TANAH....................................2-2 2.1 LINGKUP PEKERJAAN ..............................................................................2-2 2.2 METODOLOGI PENYELIDIKAN TANAH LAPANGAN ..................................2-2 2.2.1 Pemboran ...............................................................................................2-2 2.2.2 Pengambilan Contoh Tanah Tidak Terganggu......................................2-3 2.2.3 SPT (Standard Penetration Test) ...........................................................2-4 2.2.4 DCPT (Dutch Cone Penetration Test)/Sondir .......................................2-4 2.3 METODOLOGI PENYELIDIKAN TANAH LABORATORIUM ..........................2-4 2.3.1 Specific Gravity ......................................................................................2-5 2.3.2 Water Content / Moisture Content .........................................................2-5 2.3.3 Analisis Saringan dan Hidrometer.........................................................2-5 2.3.4 Atterberg’s Limit ....................................................................................2-6 2.3.5 Triaxial-UU............................................................................................2-6 2.3.6 Consolidation Test .................................................................................2-6

BAB 3 ANALISIS GEOTEKNIK...................................................................3-1 3.1 KLASIFIKASI TANAH.............................................................................3-1 3.2 PROFIL LAPISAN TANAH .........................................................................3-2 3.3 PARAMETER TANAH................................................................................3-9 3.3.1 Hasil Uji Laboratorium..........................................................................3-9 3.3.2 Korelasi Parameter Tanah...................................................................3-10 3.4 ANALISIS PENURUNAN 1-D KONSOLIDASI TERZAGHI ...........................3-11 3.4.1 Immediate atau Elastic Settlement (Si) ................................................3-11 3.4.2 Consolidation Settlement (Sc) ..............................................................3-11 3.4.3 Time Rate Consolidation......................................................................3-12 3.4.4 Hasil Analisis Penurunan Konsolidasi ................................................3-13

BAB 4 ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG ............................4-1 4.1 KAPASITAS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG ..........................................4-1 4.1.1 Kapasitas Daya Dukung Aksial Tiang Tunggal.....................................4-2 4.1.2 Tahanan Geser Selimut Tiang................................................................4-2 4.1.3 Tahanan Ujung Tiang ............................................................................4-3 4.1.4 Kapasitas Tarik Tiang............................................................................4-4 4.1.5 Kapasitas Lateral Tiang Tunggal ..........................................................4-4 4.2 PENENTUAN PARAMETER........................................................................4-6 4.3 KAPASITAS DAYA DUKUNG IJIN TIANG ..................................................4-7 4.4 HASIL ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG ..................................4-8

i

Page 2: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

BAB 5 KESIMPULAN.....................................................................................5-1

LAMPIRAN A: Boring Log

LAMPIRAN B: CPT Log

LAMPIRAN C: Hasil Uji Laboratorium

LAMPIRAN D: Perhitungan Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang

ii

Page 3: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Daftar Gambar

GAMBAR 1-1 LOKASI TITIK PENYELIDIKAN TANAH ......................................................1-1

GAMBAR 2-1 ROTARY DRILLING MACHINE ...................................................................2-3

GAMBAR 2-2 TABUNG SHELBY.....................................................................................2-3

GAMBAR 2-3 SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER ..........................................................................2-4

GAMBAR 3-1 PROFIL LAPISAN TANAH POTONGAN A-A DI LOKASI KOLAM RENANG TANJUNG REDEP ....................................................................................3-3

GAMBAR 3-2 PROFIL LAPISAN TANAH POTONGAN B-B DI LOKASI KOLAM RENANG TANJUNG REDEP ....................................................................................3-4

GAMBAR 3-3 PROFIL LAPISAN TANAH POTONGAN C-C DI LOKASI KOLAM RENANG TANJUNG REDEP ....................................................................................3-5

GAMBAR 3-4 PROFIL LAPISAN TANAH POTONGAN D-D DI LOKASI KOLAM RENANG TANJUNG REDEP ....................................................................................3-6

GAMBAR 3-5 PROFIL LAPISAN TANAH POTONGAN E-E DI LOKASI KOLAM RENANG TANJUNG REDEP ....................................................................................3-7

GAMBAR 3-6 PROFIL LAPISAN TANAH POTONGAN F-F DI LOKASI KOLAM RENANG TANJUNG REDEP ....................................................................................3-8

GAMBAR 3-7 GRAFIK C VS KEDALAMAN.......................................................................3-9

GAMBAR 3-8 GRAFIK � VS KEDALAMAN ......................................................................3-9

GAMBAR 3-9 GRAFIK CC VS KEDALAMAN..................................................................3-10

GAMBAR 3-10 KORELASI ANTARA NILAI N-SPT DENGAN KUAT GESER UNDRAINED (TERZAGHI & PECK, 1967) ..................................................................3-10

GAMBAR 3-11 KORELASI ANTARA NILAI N-SPT DENGAN SUDUT GESER DALAM (TERZAGHI)...........................................................................................3-11

GAMBAR 3-12 GRAFIK PENURUNAN KONSOLIDASI UNTUK BEBERAPA VARIASI TINGGI TIMBUNAN .............................................................................................3-14

GAMBAR 3-13 GRAFIK TIME RATE CONSOLIDATION ....................................................3-14

iii

Page 4: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

GAMBAR 4-1 RUANG LINGKUP PERHITUNGAN PONDASI ............................................4-1

GAMBAR 4-2 DAYA DUKUNG AKSIAL PONDASI TIANG ................................................4-2

GAMBAR 4-3 FAKTOR ADHESI API METHOD 2 (1986) ...............................................4-3

GAMBAR 4-4 KURVA P-Y UNTUK TIANG DENGAN BEBAN LATERAL ............................4-4

GAMBAR 4-5 PENENTUAN BENTUK KURVA P-Y LEMPUNG LUNAK HINGGA KAKU (MATLOCK) .............................................................................................4-5

GAMBAR 4-6 PENENTUAN KEDALAMAN KRITIS TIANG DENGAN BEBAN LATERAL PADA TANAH NON-KOHESIF (REESE, COX, DAN COOP).................................4-6

GAMBAR 4-7 PENENTUAN KURVA P-Y PASIR (REESE, COX, DAN COOP) .................4-6

GAMBAR 4-8 MINIMAL TEBAL DATA TANAH DI BAWAH DASAR PONDASI UNTUK PERHITUNGAN KAPASITAS DAYA DUKUNG UJUNG................................4-7

iv

Page 5: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Daftar Tabel TABEL 3-1 KLASIFIKASI TANAH LEMPUNG BERDASARKAN N-SPT ......................... 3-1

TABEL 3-2 KLASIFIKASI TANAH PASIR BERDASARKAN N-SPT............................... 3-1

TABEL 3-3 PARAMETER UNTUK PERHITUNGAN PENURUNAN DAN WAKTU KONSOLIDASI.. ................................................................................................. 3-13

TABEL 4-1 KOREKSI NILAI N-SPT ...................................................................... 4-7

TABEL 4-2 RANGKUMAN HASIL PERHITUNGAN KAPASITAS PONDASI TIANG .............. 4-9

v

Page 6: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Bab 1 PENDAHULUAN

Sehubungan dengan detail desain kolam renang di Tanjung Redeb – Berau, Kalimantan Timur, PT. Byma Arsihas telah melakukan penyelidikan tanah untuk mendapatkan data keadaan tanah untuk selanjutnya data tersebut digunakan untuk keperluan analisis geoteknik di lokasi kolam renang tersebut. Penyelidikan tanah yang dilakukan berupa pemboran sebanyak 5 titik, uji sondir sebanyak 12 titik, dan pengujian laboratorium. Penyelidikan tanah tersebut dilakukan mulai tanggal 29 Januari 2007 hingga tanggal 11 Februari 2007. Adapun lokasi penyelidikan tanah tersebut dapat dilihat pada Gambar 1-1.

S-01BH-1

S-06

BH-04

S-09

S-07

BH-02

BH-03

S-03

S-05

BH-05

S-08

S-04

S-02

U

Gambar 1-1 Lokasi Titik Penyelidikan Tanah

1-1

Page 7: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Bab 2 METODOLOGI PENYELIDIKAN TANAH

2.1 LINGKUP PEKERJAAN

Lingkup pekerjaan penyelidikan tanah ini meliputi penyelidikan lapangan dan pengujian laboratorium yang terdiri dari:

1. Penyelidikan lapangan yang dilakukan meliputi: a. 3 (tiga) titik pemboran mesin hingga kedalaman 40 m b. 2 (dua) titik pemboran mesin hingga kedalaman 30 m c. 12 (dua belas) titik penyondiran dengan alat sondir kapasitas 2-ton d. Standard Penetration Test e. Pengambilan undisturbed soil samples

2. Pengujian laboratorium yang dilakukan meliputi: a. Uji index properties b. Analisis butiran tanah c. Triaxial UU Test d. Consolidation Test

2.2 METODOLOGI PENYELIDIKAN TANAH LAPANGAN

Penyelidikan tanah yang dilakukan sesuai dengan American Standard for Testing Material (ASTM). Penyelidikan tanah ditujukan untuk memahami struktur tanah dan sifat mekanika tanah di wilayah proyek. Lingkup pekerjaan penyelidikan tanah yang dilakukan meliputi:

2.2.1 Pemboran

Pemboran inti sebanyak 5 titik bor. Sebanyak 3 titik dilakukan hingga mencapai kedalaman pemboran sedalam 40 m dan 2 titik dilakukan hingga kedalaman 30 m. Selama pengeboran, dilakukan pengamatan secara visual terhadap perlapisan tanah. Pada kedalaman tertentu dilakukan pengambilan contoh tanah (disturbed sample dan undisturbed sample) dan Standard Penetration Test (SPT).

Prosedur pelaksanaan dan peralatan pemboran dalam mengacu pada ASTM D 1452-80, “Standard Practice for Soil Investigation and Sampling by Auger Borings”, ASTM D 420 - 93, “Standard Guide for Investigating and Sampling Soil and Rock”, ASTM D 2488 - 93, “Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure)” dan ASTM D 2113 – 83, “Standard Practice for Diamond Core Drilling for Site Investigation”.

Data hasil pemboran dalam disajikan dalam field logs (Bore - Logs) yang didalamnya tercakup: identifikasi proyek, nomor boring, lokasi, orientasi, tanggal mulai pemboran, tanggal akhir pemboran, dan nama operator, elevasi koordinat bagian atas bore hole, klasifikasi/deskripsi tanah (kekerasan, warna, derajat pelapukan, dan identifikasi lainnya yang masih berhubungan), deskripsi litologi, kondisi air tanah, pengambilan contoh tanah, in situ test di bore hole, dst.

2-2

Page 8: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Gambar 2-1 Rotary drilling machine

2.2.2 Pengambilan Contoh Tanah Tidak Terganggu

Undisturbed samples yang dilaksanakan adalah sebanyak 20 tabung untuk keperluan uji laboratorium. Pelaksanaan pengambilan contoh tanah tidak terganggu mengacu pada ASTM D 1587-94 “Standard Practice for Thin-Walled Tube Geotechnical Sampling of Soils”. Contoh tanah undisturbed diambil dari kedalaman tertentu dengan menggunakan Shelby tube sampler (thin walled tube sampler). Kemudian contoh tanah dilindungi dari goncangan, getaran dan perubahan kadar air, yang bertujuan untuk menjaga struktur tanah dan komposisi fisiknya tetap seperti kondisi aslinya, sampai contoh tersebut dikeluarkan untuk kemudian diuji di laboratorium. Kedalaman bagian atas contoh dan panjang sampler dicatat di boring log.

Gambar 2-2 Tabung shelby

2-3

Page 9: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

2.2.3 SPT (Standard Penetration Test)

SPT (Standard Penetration Test) yang dilakukan adalah sebanyak 110 test dengan interval kedalaman lebih kurang setiap 1.5 m. Prosedur pelaksanaan dan peralatan Standard Penetration Test mengacu pada ASTM D 1586 – 84, "Standard Method for Penetration Test and Split Barrel Sampling of Soils". Hammer yang digunakan seberat 140 lbs (63 kg) dengan tinggi jatuh 30” (76.2 cm). Jumlah total tumbukan yang dibutuhkan untuk penetrasi tanah 3 × 15 cm dicatat. Nilai SPT, dinyatakan dengan nilai N, didapat dari jumlah tumbukan yang diperlukan untuk penetrasi 2 × 15 cm terakhir.

Gambar 2-3 Split spoon sampler

2.2.4 DCPT (Dutch Cone Penetration Test)/Sondir

Prosedur pelaksanaan Dutch Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) dilakukan berdasarkan standar ASTM D 3441-86, “Method for Deep Quasi-Static, Cone and Friction Cone Penetration Tests of Soil”. Nilai tahanan ujung konus, qc, dan friksi lokal atau friksi selimut, fs, diukur untuk setiap interval 20 cm.

2.3 METODOLOGI PENYELIDIKAN TANAH LABORATORIUM

Uji laboratorium yang dilaksanakan adalah:

Index properties Grainsize analysis Triaxial UU Consolidation

Metoda pelaksanaan uji laboratorium mengikuti standar-standar berikut ini:

2-4

Page 10: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

2.3.1 Specific Gravity

Specific gravity dari tanah, Gs, didefinisikan sebagai perbandingan massa volume partikel tanah di udara dengan massa volume yang sebanding dengan gas free distilled water di udara pada suhu kamar (umumnya 68° F {20° C}). Specific gravity ditentukan berdasarkan jumlah dari pycnometer yang sudah dikalibrasi, dimana massa dan suhu dari contoh tanah de-aerasi/air distilasi diukur.

Test dilakukan berdasarkan ASTM D 854-92, ”Standard Test Method for Specific Gravity of Soils”. Metoda ini digunakan pada contoh tanah dengan komposisi ukuran partikel lebih kecil daripada saringan No. 4 (4.75 mm). Untuk partikel dengan ukuran lebih besar dari saringan tersebut, prosedur pelaksanaan mengacu pada ”Test Method Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate (ASTM C 127-88)”. Specific gravity dari tanah diperlukan untuk menentukan hubungan antara berat dan volume tanah, dan digunakan untuk perhitungan test laboratorium lainnya.

2.3.2 Water Content / Moisture Content

Moisture content, w, didefinisikan sebagai perbandingan antara berat air di dalam contoh tanah dengan berat partikel solid. Contoh basah mula-mula ditimbang, kemudian dikeringkan di dalam oven pada suhu 230° F (110° C) hingga mencapai berat konstan. Berat contoh setelah dikeringkan adalah berat partikel solid. Perubahan berat yang terjadi selama proses pengeringan setara dengan berat air. Untuk tanah organik, terkadang disarankan untuk menurunkan suhu pengeringan hingga mencapai 140° F (60° C).

Test dilakukan mengacu pada ASTM D 2216-92, ”Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock”. Moisture content diperlukan untuk menentukan properties tanah dan dapat dikorelasikan dengan parameter-parameter lainnya.

2.3.3 Analisis Saringan dan Hidrometer

Test ini dilakukan dalam dua tahapan, yaitu: analisis saringan untuk tanah berbutir kasar (pasir, kerikil), dan analisis hidrometer untuk tanah berbutir halus (lempung, lanau). Tanah yang mengandung butiran kasar dan butiran halus di uji secara berurutan. Material dengan ukuran lebih kecil dari saringan No. 200 (0.075 mm atau lebih kecil) dianalisis dengan menggunakan hidrometer.

Analisis saringan memberikan pengukuran secara langsung terhadap distribusi ukuran partikel tanah dengan cara melewatkan contoh pada sejumlah wire screens, dari ukuran yang terbesar hingga terkecil. Jumlah material yang tertahan di tiap-tiap saringan kemudian ditimbang. Prosedur pelaksanaan pengujian ini mengacu pada ASTM C 136-95a, ”Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates”.

Pelaksanaan uji hidrometer mengacu pada Hukum Stokes. Diameter partikel tanah didefinisikan sebagai diameter bola yang memiliki unit massa dan kecepatan jatuh yang sama dengan partikel tanah. Jadi distribusi ukuran partikel didapatkan dengan menggunakan sebuah hydrometer untuk mengukur perubahan specific gravity, suspensi tanah-air seperti partikel tanah mengendap.

Hasil analisis dicatat dalam combined grain size distribution plot sebagai persentase contoh yang lebih kecil beratnya versus log diameter partikel. Data ini diperlukan di dalam klasifikasi tanah. Kurva tersebut juga dapat menunjukkan parameter-parameter lainnya, seperti diameter

2-5

Page 11: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

efektif (D10) dan koefisien uniformity (Cu). Test dilakukan berdasarkan ASTM D 422-63 ”Method for Particle Size Analysis of Soils”, dan ASTM D 1140 – 92 ”Test Method for Amount of Material in Soils Finer than the No.200 (75-μm) Sieve”.

2.3.4 Atterberg’s Limit

Liquid limit dilakukan dengan cara meletakkan pasta tanah dalam mangkuk kuningan kemudian digores tepat ditengahnya dengan alat penggores standar. Dengan menjalankan alat pemutar, mangkuk kemudian dinaikturunkan dari ketinggian 0.4 inci (10 mm) dengan kecepatan 2 drop/detik. Liquid limit dinyatakan sebagai moisture content dari tanah yang dibutuhkan untuk menutup goresan yang berjarak 0.5 inci (13 mm) sepanjang dasar contoh tanah dalam mangkuk sesudah 25 pukulan. Pengujian dilakukan menurut ASTM D 4318.

Plastic limit ditentukan dengan mengetahui secara pasti moisture content terkecil, dimana material dapat digulung hingga diameter 0.125 inches (3.2 mm) tanpa mengalami keretakan. Pengujian dilakukan sesuai dengan ASTM D 4318-95, ”Test Method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils”.

Shrinkage limit (SL) didefinisikan sebagai water content maksimum dimana pengurangan water content tidak akan menurunkan volume dari massa tanah. Pengujian dilakukan dengan mengacu pada ASTM D 427-93, ”Test Method for Shrinkage Factors of Soils”.

Nilai-nilai ini digunakan didalam klasifikasi tanah dan dapat dikorelasikan dengan parameter-parameter lainnya.

2.3.5 Triaxial-UU

Tujuan test ini adalah untuk memperoleh parameter kekuatan tanah dalam kondisi undrained. Pada uji ini contoh yang diuji tidak diperkenankan untuk mengalami konsolidasi akibat tekanan confining dan selama geser berlangsung tidak diperkenankan adanya aliran (undrained). Dibutuhkan minimal tiga buah pengujian dengan tekanan confining yang berbeda-beda untuk mendapatkan parameter tegangan total. Jika selama pengujian tekanan air pori diukur, maka parameter tegangan efektif juga dapat diukur. Pengujian dilakukan menurut ASTM D 2850-95, “Test Method for Unconsolidated, Undrained Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soils in Triaxial Compression”.

2.3.6 Consolidation Test

Test ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh nilai koefisien konsolidasi Cc dan Cv yang selanjutnya dipergunakan untuk memprediksi lamanya konsolidasi dan besarnya settlement. Metode yang digunakan dalam pengujian konsolidasi adalah pengujian konsolidasi satu dimensi. Pada uji ini spesimen diletakkan pada konsolidometer (oedometer) diantara dua batu pori sehingga memungkinkan terjadinya drainase. Berbagai prosedur pembebanan dapat digunakan selama pengujian. Pengujian dengan peningkatan pembebanan adalah yang paling umum digunakan. Pada prosedur ini, spesimen diberikan beban yang semakin bertambah. Biasanya beban awal yang digunakan besarnya 1/16 tsf (5 kPa) dan ditambah menjadi dua kalinya hingga mencapai 16 tsf (1600 kPa). Setelah pemberian beban, perubahan tingga sampel dimonitor umumnya selama 24 jam. Untuk mengevaluasi parameter rekompresi, siklus pembebanan unload/reload dapat dilakukan selama pembebanan. Agar diperoleh hasil pengamatan parameter rekompresi yang lebih baik untuk lempung terkonsolidasi berlebih (over consolidated clay), siklus

2-6

Page 12: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

unload/reload dilakukan setelah tekanan pra konsolidasi terdefinisikan. Setelah beban maksimum tercapai, beban dikurangi secara bertahap. Pengujian dilakukan menurut ASTM D 2435-90, ”Test Method for One Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils”.

Data dari uji konsolidasi biasanya ditampilkan dalam grafik e-log p dengan plot angka pori (e) sebagai fungsi dari logaritma tekanan (p) atau dalam grafik ε-log p dimana ε adalah regangan dalam %. Parameter-parameter yang diperlukan untuk perhitungan penurunan dapat diperoleh dari kurva ini adalah: indeks kompresi (Cc), indeks rekompresi (Cr), tekanan pra konsolidasi (Po atau Pc) dan angka pori awal (eo).

2-7

Page 13: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Bab 3 ANALISIS GEOTEKNIK

3.1 KLASIFIKASI TANAH

Dengan menggunakan nilai N-SPT dapat ditentukan konsistensi dari lapisan tanah lempung dan pasir seperti yang terlihat pada Tabel 3-1. Sedangkan untuk menentukan besarnya sudut geser dalam berdasarkan nilai N-SPT pada tanah pasir dapat digunakan Tabel 3-2.

Tabel 3-1 Klasifikasi Tanah Lempung Berdasarkan N-SPT

(After Bowles, 1988)

Consistency N’70 Remarks

Very soft 0-2 Squishes between fingers when squeezed

Soft 3-5 Very easily deformed by squeezing

Medium

NC

You

ng

clay

6-9 Stiff 10-16 Hard to deform by hand squeezing

Very stiff 17-30 Very hard to deform by hand

Hard incr

easin

g

OCR

Age

d/

cem

ente

d

> 30 Nearly impossible to deform by hand

Tabel 3-2 Klasifikasi Tanah Pasir Berdasarkan N-SPT

(After Bowles, 1988)

Description Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Very dense

Dr 0 0.15 0.35 0.65 0.85 SPT N’70

Fine 1-2 3-6 7-15 16-30 ? Medium 2-3 4-7 8-20 21-40 > 40 Coarse 3-6 5-9 10-25 26-45 > 45

φ Fine 26-28 28-30 30-34 33-38

Medium 27-28 30-32 32-36 36-42 < 50 Coarse 28-30 30-34 33-40 40-50

γwet (kN/m3) 11-16 14-18 17-20 17-22 20-23

3-1

Page 14: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

3-2

3.2 PROFIL LAPISAN TANAH

Lapisan tanah di lokasi kolam renang secara umum terbagi atas tanah lempung lanauan dengan konsistensi sangat lunak (very soft), sedang hingga keras (medium stiff – hard) dan batuan lempung (claystone) pada kedalaman tanah keras. Selain itu, dijumpai batubara (coal) dan tanah organik (peat) di beberapa lokasi. Simplifikasi lapisan tanah yang dijumpai di lokasi kolam renang ini dapat dilihat pada Gambar 3-1 - Gambar 3-6.

Page 15: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

AA

KETERANGAN :

SILTY CLAY,very soft

SILTY CLAY,med. stiff to very stiff

SILTY CLAY,hard

COAL PEAT CLAYSTONE

qc>150

qc (kg/cm )2S-06 BH-01

2

1

1

21

1

11

1

1

1

3

8

21

73

100100

100

100

100

100100

100

100

100

qc>150

S-01 qc (kg/cm )2

25.00m 15.00m

SILTY CLAY, very softN=1-2

CLAYSTONE

N=8-21SILTY CLAY, med. stiff to very stiff

N>100

S-01

BH-1S-06

BH-04

S-09

S-07

BH-02

BH-03

S-03

S-05

BH-05

S-08

S-04

S-02

U

Gambar 3-1 Profil lapisan tanah potongan A-A di lokasi Kolam Renang Tanjung Redep

3-3

Page 16: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

S-01BH-1

S-06

BH-04

S-09

S-07

BH-02

BH-03

S-03

S-05

BH-05

S-08

S-04

S-02

U

B

B

KETERANGAN :

SILTY CLAY,very soft

SILTY CLAY,med. stiff to very stiff

SILTY CLAY,hard

COAL PEAT CLAYSTONE

BH-04

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

8

25

45

50

55

5050

50

19

20

40100

100

100

100

100

100

100

BH-02

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

26

14

86

90

50

82

8252

26

681

40100

100

100

100

S-05

qc>150

qc (kg/cm )2

30.00m 28.00m

??????

???

SILTY CLAY, very softN=1-2

CLAYSTONEN>100

SILTY CLAY, stiff to very stiffN=8-45

SILTY CLAY, hardN>45

SILTY CLAY, very stiffN=19-26

COALN=40-100

PEATN<1

Gambar 3-2 Profil lapisan tanah potongan B-B di lokasi Kolam Renang Tanjung Redep

3-4

Page 17: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

S-01BH-1

S-06

BH-04

S-09S-07

BH-02

BH-03

S-03

S-05

BH-05

S-08

S-04

S-02

U

C

C

KETERANGAN :

SILTY CLAY,very soft

SILTY CLAY,med. stiff to very stiff

SILTY CLAY,hard

COAL PEAT CLAYSTONE

qc>150

qc (kg/cm )2S-09

qc>150

qc (kg/cm )2S-07 BH-03

1

1

2

1

1

2

2

5

12100

100100

100

100

100

100

BH-05

2

1

2

1

1

1

2

5

4

5

5

7100

100

100

100

100

100

100

25.00m 25.00m 33.00m

???

SILTY CLAY, very softN=1-2

CLAYSTONE

SILTY CLAY, medium stiff to stiffN=4-12

N>100

Gambar 3-3 Profil lapisan tanah potongan C-C di lokasi Kolam Renang Tanjung Redep

3-5

Page 18: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

S-01BH-1

S-06

BH-04

S-09

S-07

BH-02

BH-03

S-03

S-05

BH-05

S-08

S-04

S-02

U

DD

KETERANGAN :

SILTY CLAY,very soft

SILTY CLAY,med. stiff to very stiff

SILTY CLAY,hard

COAL PEAT CLAYSTONE

qc>150

qc (kg/cm )2S-06 BH-04

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

8

25

45

50

55

5050

50

19

20

40100

100

100

100

100

100

100

qc>150

qc (kg/cm )2S-07

30.00m 30.00m

???

???

???

??????

???

SILTY CLAY, very softN=1-2

CLAYSTONE

SILTY CLAY, med. stiff to very stiffN=8-25

SILTY CLAY, hardN>45

SILTY CLAY, very stiffN=19-20

COALN=40-100

N>100

Gambar 3-4 Profil lapisan tanah potongan D-D di lokasi Kolam Renang Tanjung Redep

3-6

Page 19: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

S-01BH-1

S-06

BH-04

S-09

S-07

BH-02

BH-03

S-03

S-05

BH-05

S-08

S-04

S-02

U

EE

KETERANGAN :

SILTY CLAY,very soft

SILTY CLAY,med. stiff to very stiff

SILTY CLAY,hard

COAL PEAT CLAYSTONE

PEATN<1

BH-01

2

1

1

21

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

8

21

73100100

100

100

100

100100

100

100

100

S-02

CLAY

qc>150

qc (kg/cm )2 BH-02

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

26

14

86

90

50

82

82

52

26

681

40100

100

100

100

BH-03

1

1

2

1

1

2

25

12100

100100

100100

100100

S-04

qc>150

qc (kg/cm )2

qc>150

qc (kg/cm )2S-08

25.00m 25.00m 25.00m 20.00m 25.00m

SILTY CLAY, very softN=1-2

CLAYSTONEN>100

SILTY CLAY, medium stiff to very stiffN=5-26

SILTY CLAY, hardN>45

Gambar 3-5 Profil lapisan tanah potongan E-E di lokasi Kolam Renang Tanjung Redep

3-7

Page 20: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

3-8

S-01BH-1

S-06

BH-04

S-09

S-07

BH-02

BH-03

S-03

S-05

BH-05

S-08

S-04

S-02

U

F

F

KETERANGAN :

SILTY CLAY,very soft

SILTY CLAY,med. stiff to very stiff

SILTY CLAY,hard

COAL PEAT CLAYSTONE

qc>150

S-01 qc (kg/cm )2 S-05

qc>150

qc (kg/cm )2 BH-05CH, SILTY CLAY, very soft

2

1

2

1

1

1

2

5

4

55

7100

100

100

100

100

100

100

64.00m 20.00m

SILTY CLAY, very softN=1-2

CLAYSTONEN>100

N=4-7SILTY CLAY, medium stiff

Gambar 3-6 Profil lapisan tanah potongan F-F di lokasi Kolam Renang Tanjung Redep

Page 21: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

3.3 PARAMETER TANAH

3.3.1 Hasil Uji Laboratorium

Grafik parameter-parameter tanah hasil uji laboratorium ditunjukkan pada Gambar 3-7 - Gambar 3-9.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20

UU, c (kN/m2)

Ked

alam

an (m

)

BH-01 BH-02

BH-03 BH-04

BH-05

Gambar 3-7 Grafik c vs kedalaman

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 1 2 3 4 5UU, φ (deg)

Ked

alam

an (m

)

BH-01 BH-02

BH-03 BH-04

BH-05

Gambar 3-8 Grafik φ vs kedalaman

3-9

Page 22: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Cc

Ked

alam

an (m

)

BH-01 BH-02

BH-03 BH-04

BH-05

Gambar 3-9 Grafik Cc vs kedalaman

3.3.2 Korelasi Parameter Tanah

Parameter tanah ditentukan berdasarkan hasil penyelidikan tanah. Pada kondisi dimana tidak terdapat hasil pengujian tanah atau properti tanah sulit diukur secara langsung, parameter tanah ditentukan berdasarkan engineering judgment maupun korelasi terhadap properti tanah. Korelasi properti tanah disajikan dalam Gambar 3-10 dan Gambar 3-11.

Undra

ined

shea

r st

rength

- k

N/m

SPT N-value - blows/300 mm

CL

Terzaghi and Peck

SC-ML

Soil groups refer to

2 Unified system

CH Sowers

Gambar 3-10 Korelasi Antara Nilai N-SPT Dengan Kuat Geser Undrained

(Terzaghi & Peck, 1967)

3-10

Page 23: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Gambar 3-11 Korelasi Antara Nilai N-SPT Dengan Sudut Geser Dalam (Terzaghi)

3.4 ANALISIS PENURUNAN 1-D KONSOLIDASI TERZAGHI

Settlement dari suatu lapisan tanah yang dibebani dapat dibedakan menjadi 2 (dua) jenis, yaitu : immediate/elastic settlement dan consolidation settlement.

3.4.1 Immediate atau Elastic Settlement (Si)

Elastic settlement dari tanah terjadi sewaktu atau setelah masa konstruksi suatu struktur. Persamaan untuk mengevaluasi besarnya elastic settlement rata-rata dari pondasi fleksibel di tanah lempung jenuh (saturated clay) menurut Janbu, Bjerrum, dan Kjaernsli adalah sebagai berikut:

Si = s

o21 E

BqAA

×××

dimana,

qo = beban luar

Es = Young’s modulus

A1 = koefisien modifikasi sebagai fungsi dari H/B

A2 = koefisien modifikasi sebagai fungsi dari Df/B

Berdasarkan kondisi aktual di lapangan, elastic settlement pada lokasi kolam renang dapat diantisipasi dengan penimbunan kembali lokasi tanah yang sebelumnya digali untuk kebutuhan konstruksi, hingga mencapai kedalaman yang diinginkan (levelling).

3.4.2 Consolidation Settlement (Sc)

Consolidation settlement merupakan settlement yang bergantung pada waktu dan terjadi sebagai hasil dari pengaliran air pori dari rongga yang berada pada tanah lempung jenuh (saturated clayey soils). Pengaliran air pori dari rongga terjadi saat tanah lempung jenuh dikenai beban tambahan. Persamaan settlement konsolidasi satu dimensi adalah sebagai berikut :

3-11

Page 24: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Normally consolidated clays:

SC = c

av0

0

cc

ppp

loge1HC Δ+

×+×

Over consolidated clays dengan po+Δpav<pc

SC = c

av0

0

cs

ppp

loge1HC Δ+

×+×

Over consolidated clays dengan po<pc<po+Δpav

SC = c

av0

0

cc

0

c

0

cs

ppp

loge1HC

pp

loge1HC Δ+

++×

dimana, po = tekanan tanah efektif di lapisan lempung Δpav = pertambahan beban/tekanan rata-rata di lapisan lempung pc = tekanan pre-consolidation eo = initial void ratio di lapisan lempung Cc = compression index Cs = swelling index Hc = tebal lapisan lempung Total settlement (St) dari tanah adalah sebagai berikut:

St = Si + Sc

3.4.3 Time Rate Consolidation

Konsolidasi adalah hasil disipasi dari excess tekanan air pori pada lapisan lempung. Disipasi tekanan air pori, pada suatu waktu, meningkatkan tekanan efektif, yang kemudian menyebabkan settlement. Untuk memperkirakan tingkat konsolidasi dari lapisan lempung pada waktu (t) setelah dikenai beban, tingkat disipasi excess tekanan air pori harus diketahui terlebih dahulu.

Besar konsolidasi rata-rata dari lapisan lempung adalah sebagai berikut:

U = max

t

SS

dimana, St = settlement lapisan lempung pada waktu (t) setelah dikenai beban Smax = settlement konsolidasi maksimum pada lempung bila dikenai beban

Lamanya waktu (t) untuk mencapai tingkat konsolidasi yang diinginkan dapat diperkirakan dengan menggunakan formula:

t = v

2vC

HT ×

dimana, H = drainage path maksimum Cv = koefisien konsolidasi (hasil uji laboratorium)

3-12

Page 25: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Tv = faktor waktu non dimensional

= 2

100%U

4⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

π

Penurunan konsolidasi dihitung berdasarkan teori konsolidasi satu dimensi dari Terzaghi:

0

0

0

cc q

pqloge1HcS Δ+

+=

dimana:

Sc : penurunan konsolidasi

cc : koefisien konsolidasi

H : tebal tanah lempung

e0 : angka pori awal

q0 : tegangan efektif awal

Δp : pertambahan tegangan akibat beban fondasi

3.4.4 Hasil Analisis Penurunan Konsolidasi

Berdasarkan data tanah di lokasi kolam renang, parameter yang digunakan untuk melakukan analisis konsolidasi ditunjukkan pada Tabel 3-3 .

Tabel 3-3 Parameter untuk perhitungan penurunan dan waktu konsolidasi

Bor. No. Kedalaman (m) CcCv

(cm2/detik)

BH-01 16.00 - 16.55 0.594 0.00050

BH-02 16.00 - 16.55 0.143 0.00115

BH-03 2.50 - 3.00 0.560 0.00080

BH-04 11.00 - 11.55 0.561 0.00040

BH-04 27.00 - 27.50 0.207 0.00040

BH-05 2.50 - 3.00 0.617 0.00120

BH-05 16.00 - 16.50 0.587 0.00140

Analisis penurunan dilakukan pada analisis penurunan konsolidasi saja, mengingat kebiasaan di lapangan immediate settlement (penurunan elastis) akan diperbaiki langsung saat konstruksi dengan melakukan leveling pada elevasi design.

Hasil analisis konsolidasi untuk kolam renang tanjung redeb ditunjukkan pada Gambar 3-12 dan Gambar 3-13.

3-13

Page 26: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Tinggi Timbunan (m)

Penu

runa

n K

onso

lidas

i (m

m)

Penurunan Konsolidasi Gambar 3-12 Grafik penurunan konsolidasi untuk beberapa variasi tinggi timbunan

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500

Waktu Konsolidasi (bulan)

Der

ajat

Kon

solid

asi (

%)

Waktu Konsolidasi Gambar 3-13 Grafik time rate consolidation

3-14

Page 27: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Bab 4 ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG

4.1 KAPASITAS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG

Pondasi tiang biasa digunakan untuk memastikan suatu bangunan berada dalam kondisi aman. Situasi yang memerlukan tiang sebagai sistem pondasi adalah sebagai berikut:

Lapisan tanah pada lokasi pekerjaan merupakan lapisan yang sangat kompresibel dan memiliki daya dukung yang rendah.

Struktur atas menerima gaya horizontal. Struktur atas menerima gaya uplift.

Pondasi tiang menahan beban kompresi melalui tahanan selimut dan tahanan ujung, beban uplift ditahan melalui tahanan selimut dan beban lateral ditahan oleh kekakuan tiang dan tanah disekelilingnya. Perhitungan kapasitas daya dukung pondasi dilakukan dengan meninjau beberapa kondisi sebagai berikut:

1. Kapasitas daya dukung tiang

- Kapasitas daya dukung aksial tiang tunggal

- Kapasitas daya dukung group tiang

2. Interaksi tanah dan group tiang

PV

PH

PH

MTRANS

MLONG

Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Tunggal

Analisa group tiang untuk gaya-gayayang bekerja pada tiang pondasi

- Panjang pondasi tiang- Penulangan Pile Cap

P

Gambar 4-1 Ruang Lingkup Perhitungan Pondasi

4-1

Page 28: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

4.1.1 Kapasitas Daya Dukung Aksial Tiang Tunggal

Secara umum, kapasitas daya dukung ultimate aksial dari pondasi tiang, dapat diperoleh dengan menjumlahkan kapasitas daya dukung ujung dan tahanan geser selimut tiang. Kapasitas daya dukung tersebut dapat ditulis seperti terlihat pada persamaan dibawah ini.

Qu = Qp + Qs

dimana:

Qu = kapasitas daya dukung ultimate

Qp = kapasitas daya dukung ujung ultimate

Qs = tahanan geser selimut tiang ultimate

Qp

Qs

Gambar 4-2 Daya Dukung Aksial Pondasi Tiang

4.1.2 Tahanan Geser Selimut Tiang

Tahanan geser selimut tiang ultimate dari pondasi pada tanah c-φ dapat dihitung berdasarkan persamaan sebagai berikut:

Qs = Qsc + Qsφ

dimana:

Qs = tahanan geser selimut tiang ultimate

Qsc = kontribusi dari kohesi tanah, c (pada tanah lempung)

Qsφ = kontribusi dari sudut geser dalam tanah, φ (pada tanah pasir)

Secara umum, kontribusi kohesi tanah untuk tahanan geser selimut tiang ultimate dapat diperoleh dengan menggunakan persamaan sebagai berikut:

4-2

Page 29: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

∑ ⋅⋅⋅= − plcQ iiusc α

dimana:

α = faktor adhesi

cu-i = kohesi tanah undrained pada lapisan ke-i

li = panjang tiang pada lapisan ke-i

p = keliling tiang

Besarnya nilai faktor adhesi, α, khususnya untuk tiang pancang, dapat ditentukan dengan menggunakan metoda dari API sebagai berikut:

Gambar 4-3 Faktor Adhesi API Method 2 (1986)

4.1.3 Tahanan Ujung Tiang

Secara umum, kapasitas daya dukung ujung pondasi tiang yang terletak pada lapisan tanah c-φ dapat dihitung berdasarkan persamaan sebagai berikut:

Qp = Ap (c Nc* + q’ Nq*)

dimana:

Ap = luas penampang bagian ujung tiang

c = kohesi tanah pada bagian ujung tiang

q’ = tegangan vertikal efektif pada daerah ujung tiang

Nc*, Nq* = Faktor daya dukung

Tahanan ujung tiang diperhitungkan untuk jenis tanah lempung, yaitu:

Qp = 9 c Ap

4-3

Page 30: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

4.1.4 Kapasitas Tarik Tiang

Desain tiang terhadap beban tarik sangat penting untuk struktur yang mengalami beban seismik. Pada beberapa kondisi, kapasitas tarik tiang menentukan kedalaman penetrasi minimum yang diperlukan.

Menurut Nicola dan Randolph (1993), pada tanah kohesif berbutir halus (fine grained), dimana pembebanan diasumsikan terjadi pada kondisi undrained, tahanan sisi tiang pada kondisi tekan dihitung sama dengan kondisi tarik. Sedangkan pada tanah non-kohesif atau tanah teralirkan bebas (free-draining), Nicola dan Randolph (1993) menyatakan bahwa tahanan sisi biasanya dihitung 70% dari tahanan sisi untuk kondisi tekan. Karena tanah dasar pada lokasi proyek terdiri dari tanah kohesif dan non kohesif, tahanan sisi untuk kondisi tarik dihitung 70% dari tahanan sisi untuk kondisi tekan.

4.1.5 Kapasitas Lateral Tiang Tunggal

Defleksi lateral tiang akibat beban aksial pada pondasi dapat meningkatkan kisaran tekanan elastik pada tiang. Akibatnya metoda yang digunakan harus mempertimbangkan kondisi tanah pada saat yields plastically up to end pada saat selama keruntuhan geser terjadi. Dengan menggunakan metoda p-y dari Matlock maka tegangan tanah dapat dianalisis. Metoda ini juga dapat memperhitungkan efek deformasi tanah plastis pada reaksi tiang. Berikut ini diuraikan penjelasan mengenai metoda p-y, yang diambil dari “Pile Design and Construction Practice” oleh Tomlinson. Bentuk dari kurva p-y dapat dilihat dalam Gambar 4-4 Kurva P-Y untuk Tiang dengan Beban Lateral

. Tiap-tiap kurva menggambarkan tahanan lateral tanah pada kedalaman tertentu.

Gambar 4-4 Kurva P-Y untuk Tiang dengan Beban Lateral

Metoda untuk menggambarkan kurva p-y telah disusun untuk tanah dengan kenaikan modulus yang linear, misalnya pada lempung soft firm normally consolidated dan tanah granular. Faktor empirik diperoleh Matlock melalui pengujian pembebanan tiang lateral. Dalam metoda ini, langkah pertama adalah menghitung tahanan lateral ultimate tanah lempung akibat beban lateral. Pada dasarnya metoda Matlock serupa dengan metoda konvensional. Namun, faktor daya dukung untuk beban lateral Nc didapatkan melalui pendekatan yang sedikit berbeda.

Di bawah kedalaman kritis, rx, koefisien Nc, diambil sebesar 9 (sembilan). Di atas kedalaman tersebut, Nc, diperoleh melalui persamaan berikut ini:

4-4

Page 31: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

BJx

cxγ

3Nu

c ++=

dimana:

γ = density dari tanah

x = kedalaman dihitung dari permukaan tanah

cu = undrained cohesion lapisan lempung

J = factor empiris

B = lebar pondasi tiang

Pengujian yang dilakukan oleh Matlock memberikan harga J pada saat keruntuhan berkisar dari 0.5 untuk lempung lunak hingga 0.25 untuk lempung yang lebih kaku. Kedalaman kritis diperoleh melalui persamaan berikut:

x r = J

cBγ

B6

u+

Tahanan ultimate di atas dan di bawah kedalaman kritis dinyatakan dalam kurva p-y sebagai gaya (pu) per unit panjang tiang, yang tergantung pada undrained strength tanah (Cu). pu = Nc cu B

Dari titik nol hingga titik a dalam Gambar 4-5, terlihat bahwa bentuk dari kurva p-y dihasilkan dari kurva tegangan-regangan yang diperoleh dari pengujian contoh tanah pada undrained triaxial compression, atau dari kurva load-settlement hasil plate loading test.

Gambar 4-5 Penentuan Bentuk Kurva P-Y Lempung Lunak Hingga Kaku (Matlock)

Bentuk kurva ditentukan berdasarkan persamaan berikut ini:

3cu y

y5.0

pp

=

yc adalah defleksi regangan pada saat tegangan sama dengan tegangan maksimum yang dihasilkan dari kurva tegangan-regangan laboratorium. Matlock merekomendasikan nilai rata-rata sebesar 0.010 untuk lempung normally consolidated untuk digunakan pada persamaan berikut ini:

yc = 2.5 εc B

4-5

Page 32: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Prosedur yang sama juga dapat diterapkan untuk tanah pasir. Penurunan tahanan tanah lateral untuk pasir diberikan oleh Reese dkk. seperti terlihat pada Gambar 4-6 dan Gambar 4-7 berikut ini.

Gambar 4-6 Penentuan Kedalaman Kritis Tiang Dengan Beban Lateral Pada Tanah Non-

Kohesif (Reese, Cox, dan Coop)

Gambar 4-7 Penentuan Kurva P-Y Pasir (Reese, Cox, dan Coop)

Dimana x adalah kedalaman di bawah permukaan tanah yang dipilih untuk kurva p-y tertentu.

4.2 PENENTUAN PARAMETER

Dalam melakukan analisis untuk desain pondasi diperlukan parameter-parameter yang akurat. Penentuan parameter tersebut dilakukan berdasarkan hasil penyelidikan tanah. Parameter tanah yang digunakan harus memenuhi persyaratan kedalaman dari pondasi tersebut seperti terlihat pada Gambar 4-8.

4-6

Page 33: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

3-4B

a=4B

b=6-8 B

3-4B

a=4B

b=6-8 B

3-4B3-4B

a=4B

b=6-8 B

Le/B > 2.5

Gambar 4-8 Minimal Tebal Data Tanah Di Bawah Dasar Pondasi Untuk Perhitungan

Kapasitas Daya Dukung Ujung

Tabel 4-1 berikut ini menunjukkan besarnya koreksi terhadap nilai N-SPT yang diperoleh di lapangan tergantung dari metoda pelaksanaan yang digunakan.

Tabel 4-1 Koreksi Nilai N-SPT

Countr Hammer Type

Hammer Release Estimated Rod

Energy (%) Correction Factor fo r

60% Rod Energy Donut Free Fall 78 78/60 = 1.30 Japan Donut Rope an Pulley with

special throw release 67 67/60 = 1.12

Safety Rope and Pulley 60 60/60 = 1.00 US

Donut Rope and Pulley 45 45/60 = 0.75 Argentina Donut Rope and Pulley 45 45/60 = 0.75

Safety Rope and Pulley 60 60/60 = 1.00 US

Donut Rope and Pulley 45 45/60 = 0.75 Argentina Donut Rope and Pulley 45 45/60 = 0.75 Donut Free Fall 60 60/60 = 1.00 China Donut Rope and Pulley 50 50/60 = 0.83

4.3 KAPASITAS DAYA DUKUNG IJIN TIANG

Dalam analisis dengan metoda statik, beban desain dari tiang dengan panjang yang diketahui, secara umum telah diperhitungkan dengan cara membagi daya dukung ultimate pada lapisan tanah pendukung atau:

SFQ

Q uall =

dimana:

SF = angka keamanan

4-7

Page 34: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Kisaran angka keamanan terutama tergantung pada reliabilitas dari metoda analisis statik tertentu dengan pertimbangan-pertimbangan sebagai berikut:

• Faktor ketidakpastian data tanah yang ada.

• Variasi dari lapisan tanah.

• Efek dan konsistensi dari metoda instalasi tiang yang diusulkan.

• Tingkat pengawasan konstruksi.

Pada umumnya, angka keamanan yang sering digunakan berkisar antara 2 – 4 untuk kondisi operasional atau untuk beban yang bekerja selama operasi.

Menurut Tomlinson (1977), penentuan kapasitas ijin dari tiang adalah seperti ditunjukkan pada persamaan berikut:

5,2

tiangultimateKapasitastiangijinKapasitas =

Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual dan AASHTO 1992 menyarankan penggunaan angka keamanan sebesar 2.5 untuk kapasitas tiang.

Selain harus mampu menahan beban yang bekerja pada kondisi operasional maka pondasi tiang juga harus mampu menahan beban yang bekerja pada kondisi gempa. Untuk itu, pondasi harus mampu mengantisipasi momen dan gaya cabut yang terjadi akibat kondisi gempa. Kapasitas tekan pondasi tiang terhadap beban gempa (temporary load) dimana beban gempa didasarkan pada Peraturan Gempa baru (2003) yang berlaku adalah 1.3 lebih besar daripada kapasitas ijin untuk kondisi operasi.

Berdasarkan hal tersebut, untuk memenuhi persyaratan angka keamanan dalam seluruh desain pondasi tiang pada Kolam Renang Tanjung Redeb – Kab. Berau ini, diambil angka keamanan sebagai berikut:

o Angka keamanan tekan pondasi tiang pada kondisi operasi = 2.0

o Kapasitas ijin tekan saat kondisi gempa adalah 1,3 x kapasitas ijin untuk kondisi operasi, atau SF = 1.6

o Angka keamanan tarik pondasi tiang =2.5

4.4 HASIL ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG

Pada analisis daya dukung pondasi tiang, digunakan tiang pancang (spun pile) dengan diameter 0.40 m, 0.45 m, 0.50 m dan 0.60 m. Rangkuman hasil perhitungan pondasi tiang dapat dilihat pada . Perhitungan pondasi tiang secara lengkap dapat dilihat pada Lampiran D.

4-8

Page 35: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Tabel 4-2 Rangkuman hasil perhitungan kapasitas pondasi tiang

Ref. Boring No. Jenis Diameter Perkiraan Compres- Pull

Tiang Kedalaman sion OutTiang

(m) (m)

BH-1 Spun 0.40 25.00 1341.99 498.64Pile 0.45 25.00 1602.51 562.85

0.50 25.00 1883.65 628.850.60 25.00 2507.79 759.56

BH-2 Spun 0.40 20.00 1185.01 476.90Pile 0.45 20.00 1407.36 538.02

0.50 20.00 1646.20 600.570.60 20.00 2173.36 724.64

BH-3 Spun 0.40 16.00 1147.08 354.62Pile 0.45 16.00 1383.25 400.15

0.50 16.00 1640.02 446.830.60 16.00 2215.43 539.36

BH-4 Spun 0.40 18.00 1117.10 559.63Pile 0.45 18.00 1304.45 630.94

0.50 18.00 1502.41 703.540.60 18.00 1930.12 847.80

BH-5 Spun 0.40 21.00 1306.55 470.46Pile 0.45 21.00 1562.65 530.85

0.50 21.00 1839.36 592.740.60 21.00 2454.63 715.44

Properti Tiang Kapasitas Tiang Ultimate (kN)

4-9

Page 36: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Tanah dan Analisis Geoteknik Detail Desain Kolam Renang di Tanjung Redeb - Berau, Kalimantan Timur

Bab 5 KESIMPULAN

Hasil penyelidikan lapangan dan test laboratorium di atas dapat disimpulkan sebagai berikut:

1. Lapisan tanah pada lokasi kolam renang Tanjung Redep, Kab Berau pada umumnya adalah sebagai berikut :

- Lapisan atas, merupakan tanah lunak (very soft – soft silty clay) yang merupakan jenis tanah aluvial endapan dari sungai Segah. Lapisan ini hingga pada elevasi -16.00 s/d -25.00 dari permukaan tanah. Lapisan ini sangat lunak dan sangat compresible.

- Pada beberapa lokasi,dibawah lapisan lunak terdapat lapisan lempung sedang (medium silty clay).

- Pada kedalaman 16.00 – 25.00 terdapa lapisan lempung keras (very stiff – hard clay), lapisan ini merupakan lapisan bearing stratum atau lapisan pendukung.

2. Karena sifatnya yang lunak pada permkaan, timbunan langsung yang sifatnya struktural tidak direkomendasikan. Jika pekerjaan timbunan akan dilaksanakan perlu dilakukan perbaikan tanah.

3. Direkomendasikan untuk setiap bangunan dipikul oleh pondasi tiang untuk menghindari penurunan yang besar dan differential settlement.

4. Struktur yang dibangunan dengan melakukan galian hendaknya mempertimbangkan gaya up-lift karena muka air tanah pada lokasi tersebut cukup tinggi.

5-1

Page 37: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LAMPIRAN A BORING LOG

Page 38: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

BORING LOG P.T. PETROSOL

B1.TXT - Times-Normal

Plate

CLIENT : PT.

PROJECT : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim

BORE HOLE NO. : B-1

DEPTH : 40.00 m

COORDINATE : -

ELEVATION : -

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00m (at the surface)

BORING METHOD : CORING & SAMPLING

SPT : Automatic hammer

DATE : February 09 to 11, 2007

DRILLER : Endin A.M.

LOGGER : Widoyoko

RECORDED BY : Jeffrey

SAMPLE

DEPTH

(meter)

USCS

CHART

GRAPH

SYMBOL

ROCK/SOIL DESCRIPTION

DEPTH

(meter)

qu

(kg/cm2)

Depth

(m)

SPT - N value

BLOWSPERCM

N PER FOOT

40 80

RECOVERY

(%)

40 80

2.50

3.00

6.00

6.55

11.00

11.55

16.00

16.55

21.00

21.55

0.00

CH

21.00

SILTY CLAY, few fine sand, very soft.

CH

24.50

SILTY CLAY, yellowish brown to brownish grey, stiff to very stiff.

30.00

CLAY / CLAYSTONE, brownish grey, hard.

CONTINUE TO NEXT PAGE.

1.20 02/30

3.00 01/52

4.50 01/53

6.70 02/30

8.00 01/50

9.50 01/53

11.55 01/50

13.00 01/55

14.55 01/52

16.55 01/46

18.00 01/52

19.70 03/30

21.70 08/30

23.15 21/30

24.70 73/30

26.15 50/10N > 100

27.55 50/13N > 100

29.00 50/12N > 100

Page 39: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

BORING LOG P.T. PETROSOL

B1a.TXT - Times-Normal

Plate

CLIENT : PT.

PROJECT : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim

BORE HOLE NO. : B-1

DEPTH : 40.00 m

COORDINATE : -

ELEVATION : -

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00m (at the surface)

BORING METHOD : CORING & SAMPLING

SPT : Automatic hammer

DATE : February 09 to 11, 2007

DRILLER : Endin A.M.

LOGGER : Widoyoko

RECORDED BY : Jeffrey

SAMPLE

DEPTH

(meter)

USCS

CHART

GRAPH

SYMBOL

ROCK/SOIL DESCRIPTION

DEPTH

(meter)

qu

(kg/cm2)

Depth

(m)

SPT - N value

BLOWSPERCM

N PER FOOT

40 80

RECOVERY

(%)

40 80

30.00

32.00

CLAY / CLAYSTONE, brownish grey, hard.

GP

39.50

CLAYEY GRAVEL, brownish grey, very dense.

PT40.00PEAT / COAL, black, dense.END OF THIS BORING.

30.55 50/12N > 100

32.15 50/10N > 100

33.70 50/05N > 100

35.00 50/11N > 100

36.55 50/10N > 100

38.00 50/10N > 100

39.55 50/10N > 100

Page 40: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

BORING LOG P.T. PETROSOL

B2.TXT - Times-Normal

Plate

CLIENT : PT.

PROJECT : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim

BORE HOLE NO. : B-2

DEPTH : 40.00 m

COORDINATE : -

ELEVATION : -

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00m (at the surface)

BORING METHOD : CORING & SAMPLING

SPT : Automatic hammer

DATE : February 03 to 04, 2007

DRILLER : Endin A.M.

LOGGER : Widoyoko

RECORDED BY : Jeffrey

SAMPLE

DEPTH

(meter)

USCS

CHART

GRAPH

SYMBOL

ROCK/SOIL DESCRIPTION

DEPTH

(meter)

qu

(kg/cm2)

Depth

(m)

SPT - N value

BLOWSPERCM

N PER FOOT

40 80

RECOVERY

(%)

40 80

2.50

3.00

6.00

6.50

11.00

11.50

16.00

16.50

0.00

CH

16.50

SILTY CLAY, grey to yellowish grey, few sand, very soft.

CH

19.50

SILTY CLAY, yellowish grey to brownish grey, stiff to very stiff.

CH

27.50

SILTY CLAY, brownish grey, hard.

CH

30.00

SILTY CLAY, brownish grey, very stiff.

CONTINUE TO NEXT PAGE.

1.00 01/62

3.00 01/76

4.50 01/54

6.50 01/63

8.00 01/59

9.50 01/54

11.50 01/51

13.15 02/31

14.65 02/30

16.65 26/30

18.15 14/30

19.70 86/30

21.15 90/25N > 100

22.70 50/13N > 100

24.15 82/27

25.70 82/30

27.15 52/30

28.70 26/30

Page 41: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

BORING LOG P.T. PETROSOL

B2a.TXT - Times-Normal

Plate

CLIENT : PT.

PROJECT : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim

BORE HOLE NO. : B-2

DEPTH : 40.00 m

COORDINATE : -

ELEVATION : -

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00m (at the surface)

BORING METHOD : CORING & SAMPLING

SPT : Automatic hammer

DATE : February 03 to 04, 2007

DRILLER : Endin A.M.

LOGGER : Widoyoko

RECORDED BY : Jeffrey

SAMPLE

DEPTH

(meter)

USCS

CHART

GRAPH

SYMBOL

ROCK/SOIL DESCRIPTION

DEPTH

(meter)

qu

(kg/cm2)

Depth

(m)

SPT - N value

BLOWSPERCM

N PER FOOT

40 80

RECOVERY

(%)

40 80

30.00

CH31.50

SILTY CLAY, brownish grey, hard.

PT33.00

PEAT, black, very soft.

39.00

CLAY / CLAYSTONE, dark grey, hard.

40.00

SANDSTONE, brownish grey, very dense.

END OF THIS BORING.

30.15 68/30

31.55 01/50

33.15 40/30

34.15 50/12N > 100

36.00 50/12N > 100

37.55 50/10N > 100

39.15 50/05N > 100

Page 42: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

BORING LOG P.T. PETROSOL

B3.TXT - Times-Normal

Plate

CLIENT : PT.

PROJECT : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim

BORE HOLE NO. : B-3

DEPTH : 25.12 m

COORDINATE : -

ELEVATION : -

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00m (at the surface)

BORING METHOD : CORING & SAMPLING

SPT : Automatic hammer

DATE : January 31, 2007

DRILLER : Endin A.M.

LOGGER : Widoyoko

RECORDED BY : Jeffrey

SAMPLE

DEPTH

(meter)

USCS

CHART

GRAPH

SYMBOL

ROCK/SOIL DESCRIPTION

DEPTH

(meter)

qu

(kg/cm2)

Depth

(m)

SPT - N value

BLOWSPERCM

N PER FOOT

40 80

RECOVERY

(%)

40 80

3.00

3.52

6.00

6.50

11.00

11.55

0.00

CH

13.00

SILTY CLAY, grey, very soft to soft.

CH

16.00

As above, medium stiff to stiff.

25.12

CLAY / CLAYSTONE, grey to dark grey, hard.

END OF THIS BORING.

1.00 01/71

2.50 01/52

4.65 02/30

6.50 01/53

8.00 01/52

9.65 02/30

11.70 02/30

13.15 05/30

14.70 12/30

16.00 50/08N > 100

17.55 50/08N > 100

19.00 50/10N > 100

20.55 50/08N > 100

22.00 50/06N > 100

23.55 50/11N > 100

25.00 50/12N > 100

Page 43: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

BORING LOG P.T. PETROSOL

B4.TXT - Times-Normal

Plate

CLIENT : PT.

PROJECT : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim

BORE HOLE NO. : B-4

DEPTH : 40.00 m

COORDINATE : -

ELEVATION : -

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00m (at the surface)

BORING METHOD : CORING & SAMPLING

SPT : Automatic hammer

DATE : February 05 to 07, 2007

DRILLER : Endin A.M.

LOGGER : Widoyoko

RECORDED BY : Jeffrey

SAMPLE

DEPTH

(meter)

USCS

CHART

GRAPH

SYMBOL

ROCK/SOIL DESCRIPTION

DEPTH

(meter)

qu

(kg/cm2)

Depth

(m)

SPT - N value

BLOWSPERCM

N PER FOOT

40 80

RECOVERY

(%)

40 80

2.50

3.00

6.00

6.50

11.00

11.50

16.00

16.55

0.00

CH

13.00

SILTY CLAY, grey to dark grey, few sand, very soft.

CH

16.55

SILTY CLAY, yellowish grey, some sand, few fine gravel,stiff to very stiff.

CH

21.00

SILTY CLAY, reddish grey, few sand & gravel, hard.

CH

24.50

As above, hard.

CH

29.00

SILTY CLAY, brownish grey, very stiff.

PT30.00

PEAT, black, dense.

CONTINUE TO NEXT PAGE.

1.00 01/69

3.00 01/52

4.50 01/50

6.50 01/53

8.00 01/61

9.50 01/55

11.50 01/50

13.15 08/30

14.65 25/30

16.70 45/30

18.15 50/30

19.70 55/30

21.15 50/12N > 100

22.55 50/12N > 100

24.15 50/10N > 100

25.70 19/30

27.70 20/30

29.15 40/30

Page 44: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

BORING LOG P.T. PETROSOL

B4a.TXT - Times-Normal

Plate

CLIENT : PT.

PROJECT : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim

BORE HOLE NO. : B-4

DEPTH : 40.00 m

COORDINATE : -

ELEVATION : -

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00m (at the surface)

BORING METHOD : CORING & SAMPLING

SPT : Automatic hammer

DATE : February 05 to 07, 2007

DRILLER : Endin A.M.

LOGGER : Widoyoko

RECORDED BY : Jeffrey

SAMPLE

DEPTH

(meter)

USCS

CHART

GRAPH

SYMBOL

ROCK/SOIL DESCRIPTION

DEPTH

(meter)

qu

(kg/cm2)

Depth

(m)

SPT - N value

BLOWSPERCM

N PER FOOT

40 80

RECOVERY

(%)

40 80

30.00

PT

33.50

PEAT, black, dense.

40.00

CLAY / CLAYSTONE, dark grey, hard.

END OF THIS BORING.

30.55 50/08N > 100

32.00 50/10N > 100

33.55 50/07N > 100

35.00 50/08N > 100

36.55 50/10N > 100

38.00 50/10N > 100

39.55 50/12N > 100

Page 45: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

BORING LOG P.T. PETROSOL

B5.TXT - Times-Normal

Plate

CLIENT : PT.

PROJECT : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim

BORE HOLE NO. : B-5

DEPTH : 30.10 m

COORDINATE : -

ELEVATION : -

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00m (at the surface)

BORING METHOD : CORING & SAMPLING

SPT : Automatic hammer

DATE : February 02, 2007

DRILLER : Endin A.M.

LOGGER : Widoyoko

RECORDED BY : Jeffrey

SAMPLE

DEPTH

(meter)

USCS

CHART

GRAPH

SYMBOL

ROCK/SOIL DESCRIPTION

DEPTH

(meter)

qu

(kg/cm2)

Depth

(m)

SPT - N value

BLOWSPERCM

N PER FOOT

40 80

RECOVERY

(%)

40 80

2.50

3.00

6.00

6.50

11.00

11.50

16.00

16.55

0.00

CH

13.00

SILTY CLAY, green to dark grey, very soft.

CH

21.00

As above, medium stiff.

30.10

CLAY / CLAYSTONE, grey to dark grey, hard.

END OF THIS BORING.

1.15 02/30

3.00 01/51

4.65 02/30

6.50 01/60

8.00 01/52

9.50 01/50

11.65 02/30

13.15 05/30

14.60 04/30

16.70 05/30

18.15 05/30

19.70 07/30

21.00 50/12N > 100

22.55 50/13N > 100

24.00 50/12N > 100

25.55 50/10N > 100

27.00 50/10N > 100

28.55 50/12N > 100

30.00 50/10N > 100

Page 46: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LAMPIRAN B CPT LOG

Page 47: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S01.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 02 February, 2007.

POINT : S.01 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 48: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S02.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 01 February, 2007.

POINT : S.02 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 49: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S03.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 01 February, 2007.

POINT : S.03 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 50: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S04.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 31 January, 2007.

POINT : S.04 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 51: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S05.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 31 January, 2007.

POINT : S.05 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 52: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S06.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 02 February, 2007.

POINT : S.06 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 53: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S07.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 30 January, 2007.

POINT : S.07 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 54: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S08.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 30 January, 2007.

POINT : S.08 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 55: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S09.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 29 January, 2007.

POINT : S.09 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.00 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 56: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S10.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 03 February, 2007.

POINT : S.10 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : +0.20 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

25

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 57: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S11.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 03 February, 2007.

POINT : S.11 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : +0.20 (at the surface) RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 58: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

GRAPHS OF 2-ton DCPT P.T. PETROSOL

S12.TXT - Times-Normal

CLIENT : PT. COORDINATES : N = E =

PROJECT : - ELEVATION : -

LOCATION : Tanjung Redep - Berau, Kaltim DATE : 29 January, 2007.

POINT : S.12 OPERATOR : Edi Suryono

GROUND WATER LEVEL : -0.80 RECORDED : Jeffrey

0 40 80 120 160 200 2400 400 800 1200 1600 2000 24000 2 4 6 8 10 12

0

5

10

15

20

CR (kg/cm2)TF (kg/cm)LF/CR (%)

D E P T H i n M E T E R

NOTE :

CR : CONE RESIST-

ANCE IN KG

PER CM2

TF : TOTAL FRICT-

ION IN KG/CM

PERIMETER

LF/CR : RATIO OF

LOCAL FRICT-

ION TO CONE

RESISTANCE

CONE RESISTANCE >200 KG/CM2

Plate

Page 59: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LAMPIRAN C HASIL UJI LABORATORIUM

Page 60: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

ATTERBERG LIMIT

Page 61: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 01 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 16,00 - 16,50 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 72.89 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 45.68 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 27.21 Classification = CH

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 62: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 01 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 21,00 - 21,55 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 26.09 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 11.19 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 14.90 Classification = CL

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

15

20

25

30

35

40

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 63: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 02 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 11,00 - 11,50 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 77.41 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 47.68 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 29.73 Classification = CH

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 64: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 02 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 16,00 - 16,50 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 40.82 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 16.82 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 24.00 Classification = CL

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 65: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 03 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 2,50 - 3,00 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 78.36 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 48.11 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 30.25 Classification = CH

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 66: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 03 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 11,00 - 11,55 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 63.45 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 37.39 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 26.06 Classification = CH

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

50

55

60

65

70

75

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 67: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 04 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 11,00 - 11,50 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 73.14 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 44.47 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 28.67 Classification = CH

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 68: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 04 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 16,00 - 16,55 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 38.84 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 17.89 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 20.95 Classification = CL

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

25

30

35

40

45

50

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 69: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 04 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 27,00 - 27,55 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 50.00 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 24.73 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 25.27 Classification = CL - CH

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 70: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 05 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 16,00 - 16,50 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 66.92 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 42.78 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 24.14 Classification = CH

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 71: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LOCATION : TANJUNG REDEB TESTED BY : Tatang SAMPLE No. B - 05 DATE : Feb. 2007 DEPTH (M) 2,50 - 3,00 REMARKS :

Liquid Limit, LL (%) = 73.73 Plastic Index, IP (%) = 44.18 Plastic Limit,PL (%) = 29.55 Classification = CH

LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

10 100NUMBER OF BLOWS

WAT

ER C

ON

TEN

T (%

)

UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Liquid Limit %

Plat

icity

Ind

ex % CH

OH - MH

CL

ML-OLCL-ML

Page 72: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

TRIAXIAL UU (UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED)

Page 73: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location TJ. REDEB - KALTIM Tested by: Maman UBoring B - 01 Date : Feb, 2007Depth 16,00 - 16,55 Method : Unconsolidated Undrained

σ3 σ1' - σ3' σ3' u σ1' σ1 (σ1 + σ3)2

0.50 0.411 0.500 0.000 0.911 0.911 0.7061.00 0.457 1.000 0.000 1.457 1.457 1.2291.50 0.499 1.500 0.000 1.999 1.999 1.750

Cohesion (c) 0.176 kg/cm2

Angle of Int. Friction : 2.4 o

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Principal Stress kg/cm2

She

ar S

tress

kg/

cm2

Page 74: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location TJ. REDEB - KALTIM Tested by: Maman UBoring B - 02 Date : Feb, 2007Depth 11,00 - 22,50 Method : Unconsolidated Undrained

σ3 σ1' - σ3' σ3' u σ1' σ1 (σ1 + σ3)2

0.50 0.130 0.500 0.000 0.630 0.630 0.5651.00 0.143 1.000 0.000 1.143 1.143 1.0721.50 0.166 1.500 0.000 1.666 1.666 1.583

Cohesion (c) 0.056 kg/cm2

Angle of Int. Friction : 0.9 o

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Principal Stress kg/cm2

She

ar S

tress

kg/

cm2

Page 75: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location TJ. REDEB - KALTIM Tested by: Maman UBoring B - 03 Date : Feb, 2007Depth 2,50 - 3,00 Method : Unconsolidated Undrained

σ3 σ1' - σ3' σ3' u σ1' σ1 (σ1 + σ3)2

0.50 0.248 0.500 0.000 0.748 0.748 0.6241.00 0.280 1.000 0.000 1.280 1.280 1.1401.50 0.306 1.500 0.000 1.806 1.806 1.653

Cohesion (c) 0.106 kg/cm2

Angle of Int. Friction : 1.6 o

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Principal Stress kg/cm2

She

ar S

tress

kg/

cm2

Page 76: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location TJ. REDEB - KALTIM Tested by: Maman UBoring B - 03 Date : Feb, 2007Depth 11,00 - 22,50 Method : Unconsolidated Undrained

σ3 σ1' - σ3' σ3' u σ1' σ1 (σ1 + σ3)2

0.50 0.319 0.500 0.000 0.819 0.819 0.6601.00 0.372 1.000 0.000 1.372 1.372 1.1861.50 0.416 1.500 0.000 1.916 1.916 1.708

Cohesion (c) 0.128 kg/cm2

Angle of Int. Friction : 2.7 o

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Principal Stress kg/cm2

She

ar S

tress

kg/

cm2

Page 77: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location TJ. REDEB - KALTIM Tested by: Maman UBoring B - 04 Date : Feb, 2007Depth 11,00 - 11,50 Method : Unconsolidated Undrained

σ3 σ1' - σ3' σ3' u σ1' σ1 (σ1 + σ3)2

0.50 0.178 0.500 0.000 0.678 0.678 0.5891.00 0.202 1.000 0.000 1.202 1.202 1.1011.50 0.220 1.500 0.000 1.720 1.720 1.610

Cohesion (c) 0.075 kg/cm2

Angle of Int. Friction : 1.1 o

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Principal Stress kg/cm2

She

ar S

tress

kg/

cm2

Page 78: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location TJ. REDEB - KALTIM Tested by: Maman UBoring B - 05 Date : Feb, 2007Depth 2,50 - 3,00 Method : Unconsolidated Undrained

σ3 σ1' - σ3' σ3' u σ1' σ1 (σ1 + σ3)2

0.50 0.314 0.500 0.000 0.814 0.814 0.6571.00 0.385 1.000 0.000 1.385 1.385 1.1931.50 0.460 1.500 0.000 1.960 1.960 1.730

Cohesion (c) 0.110 kg/cm2

Angle of Int. Friction : 3.9 o

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Principal Stress kg/cm2

She

ar S

tress

kg/

cm2

Page 79: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location TJ. REDEB - KALTIM Tested by: Maman UBoring B - 05 Date : Feb, 2007Depth 16,00 - 16,55 Method : Unconsolidated Undrained

σ3 σ1' - σ3' σ3' u σ1' σ1 (σ1 + σ3)2

0.50 0.213 0.500 0.000 0.713 0.713 0.6071.00 0.252 1.000 0.000 1.252 1.252 1.1261.50 0.277 1.500 0.000 1.777 1.777 1.639

Cohesion (c) 0.087 kg/cm2

Angle of Int. Friction : 1.8 o

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0Principal Stress kg/cm2

She

ar S

tress

kg/

cm2

Page 80: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

CONSOLIDATION

Page 81: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location : TANJUNG REDEB - KALTIM Done by : Cecep Boring No: B - 01 Date : February, 2007 Depth : 16,00 - 16,55 Remarks :

cc =

CONSOLIDATION TEST

0.60

1.10

1.60

2.10

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Voi

d R

atio

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Log - P (kg/cm2)

Coe

f.Con

sol (

Cv)

x 1

0-3 C

M2 /S

EC

CC = 0.594

Page 82: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location : TANJUNG REDEB - KALTIM Done by : Cecep Boring No: B - 02 Date : February, 2007 Depth : 16,00 - 16,50 Remarks :

cc =

CONSOLIDATION TEST

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Voi

d R

atio

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Log - P (kg/cm2)

Coe

f.Con

sol (

Cv)

x 1

0-3 C

M2 /S

EC

CC = 0.143

Page 83: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location : TANJUNG REDEB - KALTIM Done by : Cecep Boring No: B - 03 Date : February, 2007 Depth : 2,50 - 3,00 Remarks :

cc =

CONSOLIDATION TEST

0.60

1.10

1.60

2.10

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Voi

d R

atio

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Log - P (kg/cm2)

Coe

f.Con

sol (

Cv)

x 1

0-3 C

M2 /S

EC

CC = 0.560

Page 84: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location : TANJUNG REDEB - KALTIM Done by : Cecep Boring No: B - 04 Date : February, 2007 Depth : 11,00 - 11,50 Remarks :

cc =

CONSOLIDATION TEST

0.60

1.10

1.60

2.10

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Voi

d R

atio

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Log - P (kg/cm2)

Coe

f.Con

sol (

Cv)

x 1

0-3 C

M2 /S

EC

CC = 0.561

Page 85: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location : TANJUNG REDEB - KALTIM Done by : Cecep Boring No: B - 04 Date : February, 2007 Depth : 27,00 - 27,55 Remarks :

cc =

CONSOLIDATION TEST

0.30

0.50

0.70

0.90

1.10

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Voi

d R

atio

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Log - P (kg/cm2)

Coe

f.Con

sol (

Cv)

x 1

0-3 C

M2 /S

EC

CC = 0.207

Page 86: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location : TANJUNG REDEB - KALTIM Done by : Cecep Boring No: B - 05 Date : February, 2007 Depth : 2,50 - 3,00 Remarks :

cc =

CONSOLIDATION TEST

0.60

1.10

1.60

2.10

2.60

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Voi

d R

atio

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Log - P (kg/cm2)

Coe

f.Con

sol (

Cv)

x 1

0-3 C

M2 /S

EC

CC = 0.617

Page 87: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Location : TANJUNG REDEB - KALTIM Done by : Cecep Boring No: B - 05 Date : February, 2007 Depth : 16,00 - 16,55 Remarks :

cc =

CONSOLIDATION TEST

0.60

1.10

1.60

2.10

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Voi

d R

atio

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Log - P (kg/cm2)

Coe

f.Con

sol (

Cv)

x 1

0-3 C

M2 /S

EC

CC = 0.587

Page 88: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

LAMPIRAN D PERHITUNGAN DAYA DUKUNG

PONDASI TIANG

Page 89: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-1

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.40 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.075 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.26 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.13 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.08 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 7.5 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 15.1 9.5 24.6 10.6 10.6 0.8 11.4-2.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 30.2 11.6 41.7 10.6 21.1 1.7 22.8-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 37.7 6.8 44.5 5.3 26.4 2.5 28.9-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 45.2 7.8 53.0 5.3 31.7 3.4 35.0-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 52.8 6.8 59.6 5.3 36.9 4.2 41.2-6.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 67.9 13.6 81.4 10.6 47.5 5.1 52.6-7.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 82.9 13.6 96.5 10.6 58.1 5.9 64.0-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 90.5 6.8 97.3 5.3 63.3 6.7 70.1-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 98.0 6.8 104.8 5.3 68.6 7.6 76.2-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 105.6 6.8 112.3 5.3 73.9 8.4 82.3-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 113.1 6.8 119.9 5.3 79.2 9.3 88.4-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 120.6 6.8 127.4 5.3 84.4 10.1 94.6-13.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 128.2 6.8 135.0 5.3 89.7 11.0 100.7-14.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 135.7 6.8 142.5 5.3 95.0 11.8 106.8-15.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 143.3 6.8 150.0 5.3 100.3 12.6 112.9-16.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 150.8 6.8 157.6 5.3 105.6 13.5 119.0-17.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 158.3 6.8 165.1 5.3 110.8 14.3 125.2-18.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 165.9 6.8 172.7 5.3 116.1 15.2 131.3-19.0 C1 3 18.0 1.00 22.6 188.5 20.4 208.9 15.8 131.9 16.0 148.0-20.0 C1 3 18.0 1.00 22.6 211.1 20.4 231.5 15.8 147.8 16.8 164.6-21.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 46.4 257.6 54.3 311.8 32.5 180.3 17.7 198.0-22.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 46.4 304.0 54.3 358.3 32.5 212.8 18.5 231.3-23.0 C2 21 126.0 0.50 79.2 383.2 142.5 525.7 55.4 268.2 19.4 287.6-24.0 C2 21 126.0 0.50 79.2 462.3 142.5 604.8 55.4 323.6 20.2 343.9-25.0 C3 73 350.0 0.50 219.9 682.3 659.7 1342.0 153.9 477.6 21.1 498.6-26.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 902.2 659.7 1561.9 153.9 631.5 21.9 653.4-27.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1122.1 659.7 1781.8 153.9 785.5 22.7 808.2-28.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1342.0 659.7 2001.7 153.9 939.4 23.6 963.0-29.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1561.9 659.7 2221.6 153.9 1093.3 24.4 1117.8-30.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1781.8 659.7 2441.5 153.9 1247.3 25.3 1272.5-31.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2001.7 659.7 2661.5 153.9 1401.2 26.1 1427.3-32.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2221.6 659.7 2881.4 153.9 1555.1 27.0 1582.1-33.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2441.6 659.7 3101.3 153.9 1709.1 27.8 1736.9-34.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2661.5 659.7 3321.2 153.9 1863.0 28.6 1891.7-35.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2881.4 659.7 3541.1 153.9 2017.0 29.5 2046.4-36.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3101.3 659.7 3761.0 153.9 2170.9 30.3 2201.2-37.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3321.2 659.7 3980.9 153.9 2324.8 31.2 2356.0-38.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3541.1 659.7 4200.8 153.9 2478.8 32.0 2510.8-39.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3761.0 659.7 4420.8 153.9 2632.7 32.9 2665.6-40.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3980.9 659.7 4640.7 153.9 2786.7 33.7 2820.3

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 90: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-1 Diameter : 0.4 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

8

21

73

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

2

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 91: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-1

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.45 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.080 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.41 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.16 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.09 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 9.5 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 17.0 12.1 29.0 11.9 11.9 1.0 12.9-2.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 33.9 14.6 48.5 11.9 23.8 2.0 25.8-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 42.4 8.6 51.0 5.9 29.7 3.1 32.8-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 50.9 9.8 60.7 5.9 35.6 4.1 39.7-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 59.4 8.6 68.0 5.9 41.6 5.1 46.7-6.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 76.3 17.2 93.5 11.9 53.4 6.1 59.6-7.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 93.3 17.2 110.5 11.9 65.3 7.2 72.5-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 101.8 8.6 110.4 5.9 71.3 8.2 79.4-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 110.3 8.6 118.9 5.9 77.2 9.2 86.4-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 118.8 8.6 127.3 5.9 83.1 10.2 93.4-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 127.2 8.6 135.8 5.9 89.1 11.3 100.3-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 135.7 8.6 144.3 5.9 95.0 12.3 107.3-13.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 144.2 8.6 152.8 5.9 100.9 13.3 114.2-14.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 152.7 8.6 161.3 5.9 106.9 14.3 121.2-15.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 161.2 8.6 169.8 5.9 112.8 15.3 128.2-16.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 169.6 8.6 178.2 5.9 118.8 16.4 135.1-17.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 178.1 8.6 186.7 5.9 124.7 17.4 142.1-18.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 186.6 8.6 195.2 5.9 130.6 18.4 149.0-19.0 C1 3 18.0 1.00 25.4 212.1 25.8 237.8 17.8 148.4 19.4 167.9-20.0 C1 3 18.0 1.00 25.4 237.5 25.8 263.3 17.8 166.3 20.5 186.7-21.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 52.3 289.8 68.7 358.5 36.6 202.8 21.5 224.3-22.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 52.3 342.0 68.7 410.7 36.6 239.4 22.5 261.9-23.0 C2 21 126.0 0.50 89.1 431.1 180.4 611.4 62.3 301.8 23.5 325.3-24.0 C2 21 126.0 0.50 89.1 520.1 180.4 700.5 62.3 364.1 24.5 388.6-25.0 C3 73 350.0 0.50 247.4 767.5 835.0 1602.5 173.2 537.3 25.6 562.8-26.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1014.9 835.0 1849.9 173.2 710.5 26.6 737.1-27.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1262.3 835.0 2097.3 173.2 883.6 27.6 911.3-28.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1509.7 835.0 2344.7 173.2 1056.8 28.6 1085.5-29.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1757.1 835.0 2592.1 173.2 1230.0 29.7 1259.7-30.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2004.5 835.0 2839.5 173.2 1403.2 30.7 1433.9-31.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2251.9 835.0 3086.9 173.2 1576.4 31.7 1608.1-32.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2499.3 835.0 3334.3 173.2 1749.5 32.7 1782.3-33.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2746.7 835.0 3581.7 173.2 1922.7 33.8 1956.5-34.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2994.1 835.0 3829.1 173.2 2095.9 34.8 2130.7-35.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 3241.5 835.0 4076.5 173.2 2269.1 35.8 2304.9-36.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 3488.9 835.0 4323.9 173.2 2442.3 36.8 2479.1-37.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 3736.3 835.0 4571.3 173.2 2615.4 37.8 2653.3-38.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 3983.7 835.0 4818.7 173.2 2788.6 38.9 2827.5-39.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4231.2 835.0 5066.1 173.2 2961.8 39.9 3001.7-40.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4478.6 835.0 5313.5 173.2 3135.0 40.9 3175.9

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 92: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-1 Diameter : 0.45 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

8

21

73

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

2

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

GR

Page 93: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-1

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.50 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.090 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.57 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.20 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.12 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 11.8 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 18.8 14.9 33.8 13.2 13.2 1.3 14.5-2.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 37.7 18.0 55.7 13.2 26.4 2.6 28.9-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 47.1 10.6 57.7 6.6 33.0 3.8 36.8-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 56.5 12.2 68.7 6.6 39.6 5.1 44.7-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 66.0 10.6 76.6 6.6 46.2 6.4 52.6-6.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 84.8 21.2 106.0 13.2 59.4 7.7 67.0-7.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 103.7 21.2 124.9 13.2 72.6 8.9 81.5-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 113.1 10.6 123.7 6.6 79.2 10.2 89.4-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 122.5 10.6 133.1 6.6 85.8 11.5 97.2-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 131.9 10.6 142.6 6.6 92.4 12.8 105.1-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 141.4 10.6 152.0 6.6 99.0 14.0 113.0-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 150.8 10.6 161.4 6.6 105.6 15.3 120.9-13.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 160.2 10.6 170.8 6.6 112.2 16.6 128.7-14.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 169.6 10.6 180.2 6.6 118.8 17.9 136.6-15.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 179.1 10.6 189.7 6.6 125.3 19.1 144.5-16.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 188.5 10.6 199.1 6.6 131.9 20.4 152.3-17.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 197.9 10.6 208.5 6.6 138.5 21.7 160.2-18.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 207.3 10.6 217.9 6.6 145.1 23.0 168.1-19.0 C1 3 18.0 1.00 28.3 235.6 31.8 267.4 19.8 164.9 24.2 189.2-20.0 C1 3 18.0 1.00 28.3 263.9 31.8 295.7 19.8 184.7 25.5 210.2-21.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 58.1 322.0 84.8 406.8 40.6 225.4 26.8 252.1-22.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 58.1 380.0 84.8 464.8 40.6 266.0 28.1 294.1-23.0 C2 21 126.0 0.50 99.0 479.0 222.7 701.6 69.3 335.3 29.3 364.6-24.0 C2 21 126.0 0.50 99.0 577.9 222.7 800.6 69.3 404.6 30.6 435.2-25.0 C3 73 350.0 0.50 274.9 852.8 1030.8 1883.7 192.4 597.0 31.9 628.9-26.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1127.7 1030.8 2158.5 192.4 789.4 33.2 822.6-27.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1402.6 1030.8 2433.4 192.4 981.8 34.4 1016.2-28.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1677.5 1030.8 2708.3 192.4 1174.2 35.7 1209.9-29.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1952.4 1030.8 2983.2 192.4 1366.7 37.0 1403.6-30.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 2227.3 1030.8 3258.1 192.4 1559.1 38.3 1597.3-31.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 2502.2 1030.8 3533.0 192.4 1751.5 39.5 1791.0-32.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 2777.0 1030.8 3807.9 192.4 1943.9 40.8 1984.7-33.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3051.9 1030.8 4082.8 192.4 2136.4 42.1 2178.4-34.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3326.8 1030.8 4357.7 192.4 2328.8 43.4 2372.1-35.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3601.7 1030.8 4632.6 192.4 2521.2 44.6 2565.8-36.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3876.6 1030.8 4907.4 192.4 2713.6 45.9 2759.5-37.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4151.5 1030.8 5182.3 192.4 2906.0 47.2 2953.2-38.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4426.4 1030.8 5457.2 192.4 3098.5 48.5 3146.9-39.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4701.3 1030.8 5732.1 192.4 3290.9 49.7 3340.6-40.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4976.2 1030.8 6007.0 192.4 3483.3 51.0 3534.3

Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)

Page 94: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-1 Diameter : 0.5 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

8

21

73

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

2

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 95: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-1

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.60 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.100 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.88 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.28 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.16 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 17.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 22.6 21.5 44.1 15.8 15.8 1.7 17.6-2.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 45.2 26.0 71.2 15.8 31.7 3.5 35.1-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 56.5 15.3 71.8 7.9 39.6 5.2 44.8-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 67.9 17.5 85.4 7.9 47.5 6.9 54.4-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 79.2 15.3 94.4 7.9 55.4 8.6 64.1-6.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 101.8 30.5 132.3 15.8 71.3 10.4 81.6-7.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 124.4 30.5 154.9 15.8 87.1 12.1 99.2-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 135.7 15.3 151.0 7.9 95.0 13.8 108.8-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 147.0 15.3 162.3 7.9 102.9 15.6 118.5-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 158.3 15.3 173.6 7.9 110.8 17.3 128.1-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 169.6 15.3 184.9 7.9 118.8 19.0 137.8-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 181.0 15.3 196.2 7.9 126.7 20.7 147.4-13.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 192.3 15.3 207.5 7.9 134.6 22.5 157.0-14.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 203.6 15.3 218.8 7.9 142.5 24.2 166.7-15.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 214.9 15.3 230.2 7.9 150.4 25.9 176.3-16.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 226.2 15.3 241.5 7.9 158.3 27.6 186.0-17.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 237.5 15.3 252.8 7.9 166.3 29.4 195.6-18.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 248.8 15.3 264.1 7.9 174.2 31.1 205.3-19.0 C1 3 18.0 1.00 33.9 282.7 45.8 328.5 23.8 197.9 32.8 230.8-20.0 C1 3 18.0 1.00 33.9 316.7 45.8 362.5 23.8 221.7 34.6 256.2-21.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 69.7 386.3 122.1 508.5 48.8 270.4 36.3 306.7-22.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 69.7 456.0 122.1 578.2 48.8 319.2 38.0 357.2-23.0 C2 21 126.0 0.50 118.8 574.8 320.6 895.4 83.1 402.3 39.7 442.1-24.0 C2 21 126.0 0.50 118.8 693.5 320.6 1014.1 83.1 485.5 41.5 526.9-25.0 C3 73 350.0 0.50 329.9 1023.4 1484.4 2507.8 230.9 716.4 43.2 759.6-26.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 1353.3 1484.4 2837.7 230.9 947.3 44.9 992.2-27.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 1683.1 1484.4 3167.5 230.9 1178.2 46.7 1224.8-28.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 2013.0 1484.4 3497.4 230.9 1409.1 48.4 1457.5-29.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 2342.9 1484.4 3827.3 230.9 1640.0 50.1 1690.1-30.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 2672.7 1484.4 4157.1 230.9 1870.9 51.8 1922.7-31.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3002.6 1484.4 4487.0 230.9 2101.8 53.6 2155.4-32.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3332.5 1484.4 4816.9 230.9 2332.7 55.3 2388.0-33.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3662.3 1484.4 5146.7 230.9 2563.6 57.0 2620.6-34.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3992.2 1484.4 5476.6 230.9 2794.5 58.7 2853.3-35.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 4322.1 1484.4 5806.5 230.9 3025.4 60.5 3085.9-36.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 4651.9 1484.4 6136.3 230.9 3256.4 62.2 3318.6-37.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 4981.8 1484.4 6466.2 230.9 3487.3 63.9 3551.2-38.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 5311.7 1484.4 6796.1 230.9 3718.2 65.7 3783.8-39.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 5641.5 1484.4 7125.9 230.9 3949.1 67.4 4016.5-40.0 GR 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 5971.4 1484.4 7455.8 230.9 4180.0 69.1 4249.1

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 96: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-1 Diameter : 0.6 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

8

21

73

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

2

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 97: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-2

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.40 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.075 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.26 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.13 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.08 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 7.5 4.8 12.3 5.3 5.3 0.8 6.1-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 15.1 5.8 20.9 5.3 10.6 1.7 12.2-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 22.6 6.8 29.4 5.3 15.8 2.5 18.4-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 30.2 7.8 37.9 5.3 21.1 3.4 24.5-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 37.7 6.8 44.5 5.3 26.4 4.2 30.6-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 45.2 6.8 52.0 5.3 31.7 5.1 36.7-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 52.8 6.8 59.6 5.3 36.9 5.9 42.8-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 60.3 6.8 67.1 5.3 42.2 6.7 49.0-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 67.9 6.8 74.6 5.3 47.5 7.6 55.1-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 75.4 6.8 82.2 5.3 52.8 8.4 61.2-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 82.9 6.8 89.7 5.3 58.1 9.3 67.3-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 90.5 6.8 97.3 5.3 63.3 10.1 73.4-13.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 105.6 13.6 119.1 10.6 73.9 11.0 84.8-14.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 120.6 13.6 134.2 10.6 84.4 11.8 96.2-15.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 135.7 13.6 149.3 10.6 95.0 12.6 107.6-16.0 C2 26 156.0 0.50 98.0 233.7 176.4 410.2 68.6 163.6 13.5 177.1-17.0 C2 26 156.0 0.50 98.0 331.8 176.4 508.2 68.6 232.2 14.3 246.5-18.0 C2 14 84.0 0.50 52.8 384.5 95.0 479.5 36.9 269.2 15.2 284.3-19.0 C2 14 84.0 0.50 52.8 437.3 95.0 532.3 36.9 306.1 16.0 322.1-20.0 C3 86 350.0 0.50 219.9 657.2 527.8 1185.0 153.9 460.1 16.8 476.9-21.0 C3 90 350.0 0.50 219.9 877.1 527.8 1404.9 153.9 614.0 17.7 631.7-22.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 188.5 1065.6 452.4 1518.0 131.9 745.9 18.5 764.5-23.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 188.5 1254.1 452.4 1706.5 131.9 877.9 19.4 897.3-24.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 219.9 1474.0 527.8 2001.8 153.9 1031.8 20.2 1052.0-25.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 219.9 1694.0 527.8 2221.7 153.9 1185.8 21.1 1206.8-26.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 219.9 1913.9 527.8 2441.7 153.9 1339.7 21.9 1361.6-27.0 C3 52 312.0 0.50 196.0 2109.9 470.5 2580.4 137.2 1476.9 22.7 1499.7-28.0 C3 26 156.0 0.50 98.0 2207.9 235.2 2443.2 68.6 1545.5 23.6 1569.1-29.0 C3 26 156.0 0.50 98.0 2305.9 235.2 2541.2 68.6 1614.2 24.4 1638.6-30.0 C3 68 350.0 0.50 219.9 2525.8 527.8 3053.6 153.9 1768.1 25.3 1793.4-31.0 C3 68 350.0 0.50 219.9 2745.8 527.8 3273.5 153.9 1922.0 26.1 1948.1-32.0 PT 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 2753.3 9.0 2762.3 5.3 1927.3 27.0 1954.3-33.0 C4 40 240.0 0.50 150.8 2904.1 452.4 3356.5 105.6 2032.9 27.8 2060.7-34.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3124.0 659.7 3783.7 153.9 2186.8 28.6 2215.4-35.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3343.9 659.7 4003.7 153.9 2340.7 29.5 2370.2-36.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3563.8 659.7 4223.6 153.9 2494.7 30.3 2525.0-37.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3783.7 659.7 4443.5 153.9 2648.6 31.2 2679.8-38.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 4003.7 659.7 4663.4 153.9 2802.6 32.0 2834.6-39.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 4223.6 659.7 4883.3 153.9 2956.5 32.9 2989.3-40.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 4443.5 659.7 5103.2 153.9 3110.4 33.7 3144.1

Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)

Page 98: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-2 Diameter : 0.4 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

26

14

86

90

50

82

82

52

26

68

1

40100

100

100

100

1

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

PT

CLAYSTONE

CH

Page 99: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-2

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.45 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.080 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.41 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.16 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.09 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 8.5 6.0 14.5 5.9 5.9 1.0 7.0-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 17.0 7.3 24.3 5.9 11.9 2.0 13.9-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 25.4 8.6 34.0 5.9 17.8 3.1 20.9-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 33.9 9.8 43.8 5.9 23.8 4.1 27.8-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 42.4 8.6 51.0 5.9 29.7 5.1 34.8-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 50.9 8.6 59.5 5.9 35.6 6.1 41.8-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 59.4 8.6 68.0 5.9 41.6 7.2 48.7-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 67.9 8.6 76.4 5.9 47.5 8.2 55.7-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 76.3 8.6 84.9 5.9 53.4 9.2 62.6-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 84.8 8.6 93.4 5.9 59.4 10.2 69.6-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 93.3 8.6 101.9 5.9 65.3 11.3 76.6-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 101.8 8.6 110.4 5.9 71.3 12.3 83.5-13.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 118.8 17.2 135.9 11.9 83.1 13.3 96.4-14.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 135.7 17.2 152.9 11.9 95.0 14.3 109.3-15.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 152.7 17.2 169.9 11.9 106.9 15.3 122.2-16.0 C2 26 156.0 0.50 110.3 263.0 223.3 486.2 77.2 184.1 16.4 200.4-17.0 C2 26 156.0 0.50 110.3 373.2 223.3 596.5 77.2 261.3 17.4 278.6-18.0 C2 14 84.0 0.50 59.4 432.6 120.2 552.8 41.6 302.8 18.4 321.2-19.0 C2 14 84.0 0.50 59.4 492.0 120.2 612.2 41.6 344.4 19.4 363.8-20.0 C3 86 350.0 0.50 247.4 739.4 668.0 1407.4 173.2 517.6 20.5 538.0-21.0 C3 90 350.0 0.50 247.4 986.8 668.0 1654.8 173.2 690.7 21.5 712.2-22.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 212.1 1198.8 572.6 1771.4 148.4 839.2 22.5 861.7-23.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 212.1 1410.9 572.6 1983.4 148.4 987.6 23.5 1011.2-24.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 247.4 1658.3 668.0 2326.3 173.2 1160.8 24.5 1185.4-25.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 247.4 1905.7 668.0 2573.7 173.2 1334.0 25.6 1359.6-26.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 247.4 2153.1 668.0 2821.1 173.2 1507.2 26.6 1533.8-27.0 C3 52 312.0 0.50 220.5 2373.6 595.5 2969.1 154.4 1661.5 27.6 1689.2-28.0 C3 26 156.0 0.50 110.3 2483.9 297.7 2781.6 77.2 1738.7 28.6 1767.4-29.0 C3 26 156.0 0.50 110.3 2594.2 297.7 2891.9 77.2 1815.9 29.7 1845.6-30.0 C3 68 350.0 0.50 247.4 2841.6 668.0 3509.6 173.2 1989.1 30.7 2019.8-31.0 C3 68 350.0 0.50 247.4 3089.0 668.0 3757.0 173.2 2162.3 31.7 2194.0-32.0 PT 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 3097.5 11.5 3108.9 5.9 2168.2 32.7 2201.0-33.0 C4 40 240.0 0.50 169.6 3267.1 572.6 3839.7 118.8 2287.0 33.8 2320.7-34.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 3514.5 835.0 4349.5 173.2 2460.2 34.8 2494.9-35.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 3761.9 835.0 4596.9 173.2 2633.3 35.8 2669.1-36.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4009.3 835.0 4844.3 173.2 2806.5 36.8 2843.3-37.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4256.7 835.0 5091.7 173.2 2979.7 37.8 3017.5-38.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4504.1 835.0 5339.1 173.2 3152.9 38.9 3191.7-39.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4751.5 835.0 5586.5 173.2 3326.1 39.9 3366.0-40.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4998.9 835.0 5833.9 173.2 3499.2 40.9 3540.2

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 100: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-2 Diameter : 0.45 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

26

14

86

90

50

82

82

52

26

68

1

40100

100

100

100

1

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

PT

CLAYSTONE

CH

Page 101: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-2

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.50 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.090 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.57 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.20 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.12 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 5.9 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 9.4 7.5 16.9 6.6 6.6 1.3 7.9-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 18.8 9.0 27.9 6.6 13.2 2.6 15.7-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 28.3 10.6 38.9 6.6 19.8 3.8 23.6-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 37.7 12.2 49.9 6.6 26.4 5.1 31.5-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 47.1 10.6 57.7 6.6 33.0 6.4 39.4-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 56.5 10.6 67.2 6.6 39.6 7.7 47.2-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 66.0 10.6 76.6 6.6 46.2 8.9 55.1-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 75.4 10.6 86.0 6.6 52.8 10.2 63.0-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 84.8 10.6 95.4 6.6 59.4 11.5 70.9-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 94.2 10.6 104.9 6.6 66.0 12.8 78.7-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 103.7 10.6 114.3 6.6 72.6 14.0 86.6-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 113.1 10.6 123.7 6.6 79.2 15.3 94.5-13.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 131.9 21.2 153.2 13.2 92.4 16.6 108.9-14.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 150.8 21.2 172.0 13.2 105.6 17.9 123.4-15.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 169.6 21.2 190.9 13.2 118.8 19.1 137.9-16.0 C2 26 156.0 0.50 122.5 292.2 275.7 567.8 85.8 204.5 20.4 224.9-17.0 C2 26 156.0 0.50 122.5 414.7 275.7 690.4 85.8 290.3 21.7 312.0-18.0 C2 14 84.0 0.50 66.0 480.7 148.4 629.1 46.2 336.5 23.0 359.4-19.0 C2 14 84.0 0.50 66.0 546.6 148.4 695.1 46.2 382.6 24.2 406.9-20.0 C3 86 350.0 0.50 274.9 821.5 824.7 1646.2 192.4 575.1 25.5 600.6-21.0 C3 90 350.0 0.50 274.9 1096.4 824.7 1921.1 192.4 767.5 26.8 794.3-22.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 235.6 1332.0 706.9 2038.9 164.9 932.4 28.1 960.5-23.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 235.6 1567.7 706.9 2274.5 164.9 1097.4 29.3 1126.7-24.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 274.9 1842.5 824.7 2667.2 192.4 1289.8 30.6 1320.4-25.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 274.9 2117.4 824.7 2942.1 192.4 1482.2 31.9 1514.1-26.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 274.9 2392.3 824.7 3217.0 192.4 1674.6 33.2 1707.8-27.0 C3 52 312.0 0.50 245.0 2637.4 735.1 3372.5 171.5 1846.2 34.4 1880.6-28.0 C3 26 156.0 0.50 122.5 2759.9 367.6 3127.5 85.8 1931.9 35.7 1967.6-29.0 C3 26 156.0 0.50 122.5 2882.4 367.6 3250.0 85.8 2017.7 37.0 2054.7-30.0 C3 68 350.0 0.50 274.9 3157.3 824.7 3982.0 192.4 2210.1 38.3 2248.4-31.0 C3 68 350.0 0.50 274.9 3432.2 824.7 4256.9 192.4 2402.5 39.5 2442.1-32.0 PT 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 3441.6 14.1 3455.8 6.6 2409.1 40.8 2449.9-33.0 C4 40 240.0 0.50 188.5 3630.1 706.9 4337.0 131.9 2541.1 42.1 2583.2-34.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3905.0 1030.8 4935.8 192.4 2733.5 43.4 2776.9-35.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4179.9 1030.8 5210.7 192.4 2925.9 44.6 2970.6-36.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4454.8 1030.8 5485.6 192.4 3118.4 45.9 3164.3-37.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4729.7 1030.8 5760.5 192.4 3310.8 47.2 3358.0-38.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 5004.6 1030.8 6035.4 192.4 3503.2 48.5 3551.7-39.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 5279.5 1030.8 6310.3 192.4 3695.6 49.7 3745.4-40.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 5554.3 1030.8 6585.2 192.4 3888.0 51.0 3939.1

Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)

Page 102: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-2 Diameter : 0.5 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

26

14

86

90

50

82

82

52

26

68

1

40100

100

100

100

1

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

PT

CLAYSTONE

CH

Page 103: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-2

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.60 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.100 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.88 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.28 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.16 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 8.5 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 11.3 10.7 22.0 7.9 7.9 1.7 9.6-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 22.6 13.0 35.6 7.9 15.8 3.5 19.3-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 33.9 15.3 49.2 7.9 23.8 5.2 28.9-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 45.2 17.5 62.7 7.9 31.7 6.9 38.6-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 56.5 15.3 71.8 7.9 39.6 8.6 48.2-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 67.9 15.3 83.1 7.9 47.5 10.4 57.9-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 79.2 15.3 94.4 7.9 55.4 12.1 67.5-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 90.5 15.3 105.7 7.9 63.3 13.8 77.2-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 101.8 15.3 117.1 7.9 71.3 15.6 86.8-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 113.1 15.3 128.4 7.9 79.2 17.3 96.4-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 124.4 15.3 139.7 7.9 87.1 19.0 106.1-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 135.7 15.3 151.0 7.9 95.0 20.7 115.7-13.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 158.3 30.5 188.9 15.8 110.8 22.5 133.3-14.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 181.0 30.5 211.5 15.8 126.7 24.2 150.9-15.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 203.6 30.5 234.1 15.8 142.5 25.9 168.4-16.0 C2 26 156.0 0.50 147.0 350.6 397.0 747.6 102.9 245.4 27.6 273.1-17.0 C2 26 156.0 0.50 147.0 497.6 397.0 894.6 102.9 348.3 29.4 377.7-18.0 C2 14 84.0 0.50 79.2 576.8 213.8 790.6 55.4 403.8 31.1 434.9-19.0 C2 14 84.0 0.50 79.2 656.0 213.8 869.7 55.4 459.2 32.8 492.0-20.0 C3 86 350.0 0.50 329.9 985.8 1187.5 2173.4 230.9 690.1 34.6 724.6-21.0 C3 90 350.0 0.50 329.9 1315.7 1187.5 2503.2 230.9 921.0 36.3 957.3-22.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 282.7 1598.4 1017.9 2616.3 197.9 1118.9 38.0 1156.9-23.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 282.7 1881.2 1017.9 2899.1 197.9 1316.8 39.7 1356.6-24.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 329.9 2211.1 1187.5 3398.6 230.9 1547.7 41.5 1589.2-25.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 329.9 2540.9 1187.5 3728.4 230.9 1778.6 43.2 1821.8-26.0 C3 82 350.0 0.50 329.9 2870.8 1187.5 4058.3 230.9 2009.6 44.9 2054.5-27.0 C3 52 312.0 0.50 294.1 3164.8 1058.6 4223.4 205.8 2215.4 46.7 2262.0-28.0 C3 26 156.0 0.50 147.0 3311.9 529.3 3841.2 102.9 2318.3 48.4 2366.7-29.0 C3 26 156.0 0.50 147.0 3458.9 529.3 3988.2 102.9 2421.2 50.1 2471.3-30.0 C3 68 350.0 0.50 329.9 3788.8 1187.5 4976.3 230.9 2652.1 51.8 2704.0-31.0 C3 68 350.0 0.50 329.9 4118.6 1187.5 5306.2 230.9 2883.0 53.6 2936.6-32.0 PT 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 4129.9 20.4 4150.3 7.9 2891.0 55.3 2946.3-33.0 C4 40 240.0 0.50 226.2 4356.1 1017.9 5374.0 158.3 3049.3 57.0 3106.3-34.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 4686.0 1484.4 6170.4 230.9 3280.2 58.7 3339.0-35.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 5015.9 1484.4 6500.3 230.9 3511.1 60.5 3571.6-36.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 5345.7 1484.4 6830.1 230.9 3742.0 62.2 3804.2-37.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 5675.6 1484.4 7160.0 230.9 3972.9 63.9 4036.9-38.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 6005.5 1484.4 7489.9 230.9 4203.8 65.7 4269.5-39.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 6335.4 1484.4 7819.8 230.9 4434.7 67.4 4502.1-40.0 C4 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 6665.2 1484.4 8149.6 230.9 4665.7 69.1 4734.8

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 104: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-2 Diameter : 0.6 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

26

14

86

90

50

82

82

52

26

68

1

40100

100

100

100

1

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

PT

CLAYSTONE

CH

Page 105: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-3

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.40 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.075 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.26 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.13 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.08 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 7.5 4.8 12.3 5.3 5.3 0.8 6.1-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 15.1 5.8 20.9 5.3 10.6 1.7 12.2-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 22.6 6.8 29.4 5.3 15.8 2.5 18.4-4.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 37.7 15.6 53.3 10.6 26.4 3.4 29.8-5.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 52.8 13.6 66.4 10.6 36.9 4.2 41.2-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 60.3 6.8 67.1 5.3 42.2 5.1 47.3-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 67.9 6.8 74.6 5.3 47.5 5.9 53.4-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 75.4 6.8 82.2 5.3 52.8 6.7 59.5-9.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 90.5 13.6 104.0 10.6 63.3 7.6 70.9-10.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 105.6 13.6 119.1 10.6 73.9 8.4 82.3-11.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 120.6 13.6 134.2 10.6 84.4 9.3 93.7-12.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 135.7 13.6 149.3 10.6 95.0 10.1 105.1-13.0 C1 5 30.0 0.95 35.8 171.5 33.9 205.5 25.1 120.1 11.0 131.0-14.0 C2 12 72.0 0.53 48.0 219.5 81.4 300.9 33.6 153.6 11.8 165.4-15.0 C2 12 72.0 0.53 48.0 267.4 81.4 348.9 33.6 187.2 12.6 199.8-16.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 487.4 659.7 1147.1 153.9 341.1 13.5 354.6-17.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 707.3 659.7 1367.0 153.9 495.1 14.3 509.4-18.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 927.2 659.7 1586.9 153.9 649.0 15.2 664.2-19.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1147.1 659.7 1806.8 153.9 803.0 16.0 819.0-20.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1367.0 659.7 2026.7 153.9 956.9 16.8 973.7-21.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1586.9 659.7 2246.6 153.9 1110.8 17.7 1128.5-22.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1806.8 659.7 2466.6 153.9 1264.8 18.5 1283.3-23.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2026.7 659.7 2686.5 153.9 1418.7 19.4 1438.1-24.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2246.6 659.7 2906.4 153.9 1572.7 20.2 1592.9-25.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2466.6 659.7 3126.3 153.9 1726.6 21.1 1747.6

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 106: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-3 Diameter : 0.4 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

2

2

5

12

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

1

2

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 107: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-3

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.45 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.080 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.41 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.16 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.09 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 8.5 6.0 14.5 5.9 5.9 1.0 7.0-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 17.0 7.3 24.3 5.9 11.9 2.0 13.9-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 25.4 8.6 34.0 5.9 17.8 3.1 20.9-4.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 42.4 19.7 62.1 11.9 29.7 4.1 33.8-5.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 59.4 17.2 76.6 11.9 41.6 5.1 46.7-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 67.9 8.6 76.4 5.9 47.5 6.1 53.6-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 76.3 8.6 84.9 5.9 53.4 7.2 60.6-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 84.8 8.6 93.4 5.9 59.4 8.2 67.6-9.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 101.8 17.2 119.0 11.9 71.3 9.2 80.5-10.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 118.8 17.2 135.9 11.9 83.1 10.2 93.4-11.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 135.7 17.2 152.9 11.9 95.0 11.3 106.3-12.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 152.7 17.2 169.9 11.9 106.9 12.3 119.2-13.0 C1 5 30.0 0.95 40.3 193.0 42.9 235.9 28.2 135.1 13.3 148.4-14.0 C2 12 72.0 0.53 53.9 246.9 103.1 350.0 37.8 172.8 14.3 187.2-15.0 C2 12 72.0 0.53 53.9 300.9 103.1 403.9 37.8 210.6 15.3 226.0-16.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 548.3 835.0 1383.2 173.2 383.8 16.4 400.2-17.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 795.7 835.0 1630.6 173.2 557.0 17.4 574.4-18.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1043.1 835.0 1878.0 173.2 730.1 18.4 748.6-19.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1290.5 835.0 2125.4 173.2 903.3 19.4 922.8-20.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1537.9 835.0 2372.8 173.2 1076.5 20.5 1097.0-21.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1785.3 835.0 2620.3 173.2 1249.7 21.5 1271.2-22.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2032.7 835.0 2867.7 173.2 1422.9 22.5 1445.4-23.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2280.1 835.0 3115.1 173.2 1596.1 23.5 1619.6-24.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2527.5 835.0 3362.5 173.2 1769.2 24.5 1793.8-25.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2774.9 835.0 3609.9 173.2 1942.4 25.6 1968.0

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 108: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-3 Diameter : 0.45 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

2

2

5

12

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

1

2

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 109: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-3

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.50 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.090 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.57 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.20 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.12 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 5.9 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 9.4 7.5 16.9 6.6 6.6 1.3 7.9-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 18.8 9.0 27.9 6.6 13.2 2.6 15.7-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 28.3 10.6 38.9 6.6 19.8 3.8 23.6-4.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 47.1 24.3 71.4 13.2 33.0 5.1 38.1-5.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 66.0 21.2 87.2 13.2 46.2 6.4 52.6-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 75.4 10.6 86.0 6.6 52.8 7.7 60.4-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 84.8 10.6 95.4 6.6 59.4 8.9 68.3-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 94.2 10.6 104.9 6.6 66.0 10.2 76.2-9.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 113.1 21.2 134.3 13.2 79.2 11.5 90.6-10.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 131.9 21.2 153.2 13.2 92.4 12.8 105.1-11.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 150.8 21.2 172.0 13.2 105.6 14.0 119.6-12.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 169.6 21.2 190.9 13.2 118.8 15.3 134.1-13.0 C1 5 30.0 0.95 44.8 214.4 53.0 267.4 31.3 150.1 16.6 166.7-14.0 C2 12 72.0 0.53 59.9 274.4 127.2 401.6 42.0 192.0 17.9 209.9-15.0 C2 12 72.0 0.53 59.9 334.3 127.2 461.5 42.0 234.0 19.1 253.1-16.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 609.2 1030.8 1640.0 192.4 426.4 20.4 446.8-17.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 884.1 1030.8 1914.9 192.4 618.9 21.7 640.5-18.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1159.0 1030.8 2189.8 192.4 811.3 23.0 834.2-19.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1433.9 1030.8 2464.7 192.4 1003.7 24.2 1027.9-20.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1708.7 1030.8 2739.6 192.4 1196.1 25.5 1221.6-21.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1983.6 1030.8 3014.5 192.4 1388.5 26.8 1415.3-22.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 2258.5 1030.8 3289.4 192.4 1581.0 28.1 1609.0-23.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 2533.4 1030.8 3564.3 192.4 1773.4 29.3 1802.7-24.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 2808.3 1030.8 3839.1 192.4 1965.8 30.6 1996.4-25.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3083.2 1030.8 4114.0 192.4 2158.2 31.9 2190.1

Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)

Page 110: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-3 Diameter : 0.5 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

2

2

5

12

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

1

2

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 111: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-3

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.60 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.100 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.88 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.28 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.16 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 8.5 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 11.3 10.7 22.0 7.9 7.9 1.7 9.6-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 22.6 13.0 35.6 7.9 15.8 3.5 19.3-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 33.9 15.3 49.2 7.9 23.8 5.2 28.9-4.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 56.5 35.0 91.6 15.8 39.6 6.9 46.5-5.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 79.2 30.5 109.7 15.8 55.4 8.6 64.1-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 90.5 15.3 105.7 7.9 63.3 10.4 73.7-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 101.8 15.3 117.1 7.9 71.3 12.1 83.3-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 113.1 15.3 128.4 7.9 79.2 13.8 93.0-9.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 135.7 30.5 166.3 15.8 95.0 15.6 110.6-10.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 158.3 30.5 188.9 15.8 110.8 17.3 128.1-11.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 181.0 30.5 211.5 15.8 126.7 19.0 145.7-12.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 203.6 30.5 234.1 15.8 142.5 20.7 163.2-13.0 C1 5 30.0 0.95 53.7 257.3 76.3 333.6 37.6 180.1 22.5 202.6-14.0 C2 12 72.0 0.53 71.9 329.2 183.2 512.4 50.4 230.5 24.2 254.6-15.0 C2 12 72.0 0.53 71.9 401.2 183.2 584.4 50.4 280.8 25.9 306.7-16.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 731.0 1484.4 2215.4 230.9 511.7 27.6 539.4-17.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 1060.9 1484.4 2545.3 230.9 742.6 29.4 772.0-18.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 1390.8 1484.4 2875.2 230.9 973.5 31.1 1004.6-19.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 1720.6 1484.4 3205.0 230.9 1204.4 32.8 1237.3-20.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 2050.5 1484.4 3534.9 230.9 1435.3 34.6 1469.9-21.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 2380.4 1484.4 3864.8 230.9 1666.3 36.3 1702.5-22.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 2710.2 1484.4 4194.6 230.9 1897.2 38.0 1935.2-23.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3040.1 1484.4 4524.5 230.9 2128.1 39.7 2167.8-24.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3370.0 1484.4 4854.4 230.9 2359.0 41.5 2400.4-25.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3699.8 1484.4 5184.2 230.9 2589.9 43.2 2633.1

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 112: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-3 Diameter : 0.6 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

2

2

5

12

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

1

2

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 113: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-4

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.40 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.075 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.26 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.13 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.08 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 7.5 4.8 12.3 5.3 5.3 0.8 6.1-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 15.1 5.8 20.9 5.3 10.6 1.7 12.2-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 22.6 6.8 29.4 5.3 15.8 2.5 18.4-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 30.2 7.8 37.9 5.3 21.1 3.4 24.5-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 37.7 6.8 44.5 5.3 26.4 4.2 30.6-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 45.2 6.8 52.0 5.3 31.7 5.1 36.7-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 52.8 6.8 59.6 5.3 36.9 5.9 42.8-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 60.3 6.8 67.1 5.3 42.2 6.7 49.0-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 67.9 6.8 74.6 5.3 47.5 7.6 55.1-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 75.4 6.8 82.2 5.3 52.8 8.4 61.2-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 82.9 6.8 89.7 5.3 58.1 9.3 67.3-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 90.5 6.8 97.3 5.3 63.3 10.1 73.4-13.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 46.4 136.9 54.3 191.2 32.5 95.8 11.0 106.8-14.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 94.2 231.2 169.6 400.8 66.0 161.8 11.8 173.6-15.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 94.2 325.4 169.6 495.1 66.0 227.8 12.6 240.4-16.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 94.2 419.7 169.6 589.3 66.0 293.8 13.5 307.2-17.0 C3 45 270.0 0.50 169.6 589.3 305.4 894.7 118.8 412.5 14.3 426.8-18.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 188.5 777.8 339.3 1117.1 131.9 544.5 15.2 559.6-19.0 C3 55 330.0 0.50 207.3 985.2 373.2 1358.4 145.1 689.6 16.0 705.6-20.0 C3 55 330.0 0.50 207.3 1192.5 373.2 1565.7 145.1 834.8 16.8 851.6-21.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 188.5 1381.0 339.3 1720.3 131.9 966.7 17.7 984.4-22.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 188.5 1569.5 339.3 1908.8 131.9 1098.6 18.5 1117.2-23.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 188.5 1758.0 339.3 2097.3 131.9 1230.6 19.4 1250.0-24.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 188.5 1946.5 339.3 2285.8 131.9 1362.5 20.2 1382.8-25.0 C4 19 114.0 0.50 71.6 2018.1 128.9 2147.0 50.1 1412.7 21.1 1433.7-26.0 C4 19 114.0 0.50 71.6 2089.7 128.9 2218.7 50.1 1462.8 21.9 1484.7-27.0 C4 20 120.0 0.50 75.4 2165.1 135.7 2300.9 52.8 1515.6 22.7 1538.3-28.0 C4 20 120.0 0.50 75.4 2240.5 135.7 2376.3 52.8 1568.4 23.6 1592.0-29.0 PT 40 240.0 0.50 150.8 2391.3 452.4 2843.7 105.6 1673.9 24.4 1698.4-30.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2611.2 659.7 3271.0 153.9 1827.9 25.3 1853.1-31.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2831.2 659.7 3490.9 153.9 1981.8 26.1 2007.9-32.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3051.1 659.7 3710.8 153.9 2135.8 27.0 2162.7-33.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3271.0 659.7 3930.7 153.9 2289.7 27.8 2317.5-34.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3490.9 659.7 4150.6 153.9 2443.6 28.6 2472.3-35.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3710.8 659.7 4370.5 153.9 2597.6 29.5 2627.0-36.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 3930.7 659.7 4590.5 153.9 2751.5 30.3 2781.8-37.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 4150.6 659.7 4810.4 153.9 2905.4 31.2 2936.6-38.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 4370.5 659.7 5030.3 153.9 3059.4 32.0 3091.4-39.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 4590.5 659.7 5250.2 153.9 3213.3 32.9 3246.2-40.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 4810.4 659.7 5470.1 153.9 3367.3 33.7 3401.0

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 114: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-4 Diameter : 0.4 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

1

1

8

25

45

50

55

50

50

50

19

20

40

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

1

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

PT

CLAYSTONE

CH

CH

Page 115: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-4

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.45 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.080 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.41 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.16 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.09 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 8.5 6.0 14.5 5.9 5.9 1.0 7.0-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 17.0 7.3 24.3 5.9 11.9 2.0 13.9-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 25.4 8.6 34.0 5.9 17.8 3.1 20.9-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 33.9 9.8 43.8 5.9 23.8 4.1 27.8-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 42.4 8.6 51.0 5.9 29.7 5.1 34.8-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 50.9 8.6 59.5 5.9 35.6 6.1 41.8-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 59.4 8.6 68.0 5.9 41.6 7.2 48.7-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 67.9 8.6 76.4 5.9 47.5 8.2 55.7-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 76.3 8.6 84.9 5.9 53.4 9.2 62.6-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 84.8 8.6 93.4 5.9 59.4 10.2 69.6-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 93.3 8.6 101.9 5.9 65.3 11.3 76.6-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 101.8 8.6 110.4 5.9 71.3 12.3 83.5-13.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 52.3 154.0 68.7 222.7 36.6 107.8 13.3 121.1-14.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 106.0 260.1 214.7 474.8 74.2 182.0 14.3 196.4-15.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 106.0 366.1 214.7 580.8 74.2 256.3 15.3 271.6-16.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 106.0 472.1 214.7 686.8 74.2 330.5 16.4 346.9-17.0 C3 45 270.0 0.50 190.9 663.0 386.5 1049.5 133.6 464.1 17.4 481.5-18.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 212.1 875.0 429.4 1304.5 148.4 612.5 18.4 630.9-19.0 C3 55 330.0 0.50 233.3 1108.3 472.4 1580.7 163.3 775.8 19.4 795.2-20.0 C3 55 330.0 0.50 233.3 1341.6 472.4 1813.9 163.3 939.1 20.5 959.6-21.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 212.1 1553.6 429.4 1983.0 148.4 1087.5 21.5 1109.0-22.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 212.1 1765.7 429.4 2195.1 148.4 1236.0 22.5 1258.5-23.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 212.1 1977.7 429.4 2407.2 148.4 1384.4 23.5 1407.9-24.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 212.1 2189.8 429.4 2619.2 148.4 1532.9 24.5 1557.4-25.0 C4 19 114.0 0.50 80.6 2270.4 163.2 2433.6 56.4 1589.3 25.6 1614.8-26.0 C4 19 114.0 0.50 80.6 2351.0 163.2 2514.1 56.4 1645.7 26.6 1672.3-27.0 C4 20 120.0 0.50 84.8 2435.8 171.8 2607.5 59.4 1705.0 27.6 1732.7-28.0 C4 20 120.0 0.50 84.8 2520.6 171.8 2692.4 59.4 1764.4 28.6 1793.1-29.0 PT 40 240.0 0.50 169.6 2690.3 572.6 3262.8 118.8 1883.2 29.7 1912.8-30.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2937.7 835.0 3772.6 173.2 2056.4 30.7 2087.0-31.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 3185.1 835.0 4020.0 173.2 2229.5 31.7 2261.2-32.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 3432.5 835.0 4267.4 173.2 2402.7 32.7 2435.5-33.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 3679.9 835.0 4514.8 173.2 2575.9 33.8 2609.7-34.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 3927.3 835.0 4762.2 173.2 2749.1 34.8 2783.9-35.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4174.7 835.0 5009.6 173.2 2922.3 35.8 2958.1-36.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4422.1 835.0 5257.0 173.2 3095.4 36.8 3132.3-37.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4669.5 835.0 5504.4 173.2 3268.6 37.8 3306.5-38.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 4916.9 835.0 5751.8 173.2 3441.8 38.9 3480.7-39.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 5164.3 835.0 5999.2 173.2 3615.0 39.9 3654.9-40.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 5411.7 835.0 6246.6 173.2 3788.2 40.9 3829.1

Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)

Page 116: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-4 Diameter : 0.45 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

1

1

8

25

45

50

55

50

50

50

19

20

40

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

1

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

PT

CLAYSTONE

CH

CH

Page 117: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-4

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.50 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.090 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.57 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.20 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.12 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 5.9 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 9.4 7.5 16.9 6.6 6.6 1.3 7.9-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 18.8 9.0 27.9 6.6 13.2 2.6 15.7-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 28.3 10.6 38.9 6.6 19.8 3.8 23.6-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 37.7 12.2 49.9 6.6 26.4 5.1 31.5-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 47.1 10.6 57.7 6.6 33.0 6.4 39.4-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 56.5 10.6 67.2 6.6 39.6 7.7 47.2-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 66.0 10.6 76.6 6.6 46.2 8.9 55.1-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 75.4 10.6 86.0 6.6 52.8 10.2 63.0-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 84.8 10.6 95.4 6.6 59.4 11.5 70.9-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 94.2 10.6 104.9 6.6 66.0 12.8 78.7-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 103.7 10.6 114.3 6.6 72.6 14.0 86.6-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 113.1 10.6 123.7 6.6 79.2 15.3 94.5-13.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 58.1 171.2 84.8 256.0 40.6 119.8 16.6 136.4-14.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 117.8 289.0 265.1 554.0 82.5 202.3 17.9 220.1-15.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 117.8 406.8 265.1 671.8 82.5 284.7 19.1 303.9-16.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 117.8 524.6 265.1 789.7 82.5 367.2 20.4 387.6-17.0 C3 45 270.0 0.50 212.1 736.6 477.1 1213.8 148.4 515.6 21.7 537.3-18.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 235.6 972.3 530.1 1502.4 164.9 680.6 23.0 703.5-19.0 C3 55 330.0 0.50 259.2 1231.4 583.2 1814.6 181.4 862.0 24.2 886.2-20.0 C3 55 330.0 0.50 259.2 1490.6 583.2 2073.8 181.4 1043.4 25.5 1068.9-21.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 235.6 1726.2 530.1 2256.4 164.9 1208.4 26.8 1235.2-22.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 235.6 1961.9 530.1 2492.0 164.9 1373.3 28.1 1401.4-23.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 235.6 2197.5 530.1 2727.6 164.9 1538.2 29.3 1567.6-24.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 235.6 2433.1 530.1 2963.3 164.9 1703.2 30.6 1733.8-25.0 C4 19 114.0 0.50 89.5 2522.6 201.5 2724.1 62.7 1765.8 31.9 1797.7-26.0 C4 19 114.0 0.50 89.5 2612.2 201.5 2813.6 62.7 1828.5 33.2 1861.7-27.0 C4 20 120.0 0.50 94.2 2706.4 212.1 2918.5 66.0 1894.5 34.4 1928.9-28.0 C4 20 120.0 0.50 94.2 2800.7 212.1 3012.7 66.0 1960.5 35.7 1996.2-29.0 PT 40 240.0 0.50 188.5 2989.2 706.9 3696.0 131.9 2092.4 37.0 2129.4-30.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3264.1 1030.8 4294.9 192.4 2284.8 38.3 2323.1-31.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3538.9 1030.8 4569.8 192.4 2477.3 39.5 2516.8-32.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3813.8 1030.8 4844.7 192.4 2669.7 40.8 2710.5-33.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4088.7 1030.8 5119.6 192.4 2862.1 42.1 2904.2-34.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4363.6 1030.8 5394.5 192.4 3054.5 43.4 3097.9-35.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4638.5 1030.8 5669.3 192.4 3247.0 44.6 3291.6-36.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 4913.4 1030.8 5944.2 192.4 3439.4 45.9 3485.3-37.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 5188.3 1030.8 6219.1 192.4 3631.8 47.2 3679.0-38.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 5463.2 1030.8 6494.0 192.4 3824.2 48.5 3872.7-39.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 5738.1 1030.8 6768.9 192.4 4016.6 49.7 4066.4-40.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 6013.0 1030.8 7043.8 192.4 4209.1 51.0 4260.1

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 118: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-4 Diameter : 0.5 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

1

1

8

25

45

50

55

50

50

50

19

20

40

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

1

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

PT

CLAYSTONE

CH

CH

Page 119: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-4

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.60 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.100 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.88 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.28 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.16 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 8.5 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 11.3 10.7 22.0 7.9 7.9 1.7 9.6-2.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 22.6 13.0 35.6 7.9 15.8 3.5 19.3-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 33.9 15.3 49.2 7.9 23.8 5.2 28.9-4.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 45.2 17.5 62.7 7.9 31.7 6.9 38.6-5.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 56.5 15.3 71.8 7.9 39.6 8.6 48.2-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 67.9 15.3 83.1 7.9 47.5 10.4 57.9-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 79.2 15.3 94.4 7.9 55.4 12.1 67.5-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 90.5 15.3 105.7 7.9 63.3 13.8 77.2-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 101.8 15.3 117.1 7.9 71.3 15.6 86.8-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 113.1 15.3 128.4 7.9 79.2 17.3 96.4-11.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 124.4 15.3 139.7 7.9 87.1 19.0 106.1-12.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 135.7 15.3 151.0 7.9 95.0 20.7 115.7-13.0 C2 8 48.0 0.77 69.7 205.4 122.1 327.5 48.8 143.8 22.5 166.2-14.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 141.4 346.8 381.7 728.5 99.0 242.7 24.2 266.9-15.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 141.4 488.1 381.7 869.8 99.0 341.7 25.9 367.6-16.0 C2 25 150.0 0.50 141.4 629.5 381.7 1011.2 99.0 440.7 27.6 468.3-17.0 C3 45 270.0 0.50 254.5 884.0 687.1 1571.0 178.1 618.8 29.4 648.2-18.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 282.7 1166.7 763.4 1930.1 197.9 816.7 31.1 847.8-19.0 C3 55 330.0 0.50 311.0 1477.7 839.7 2317.5 217.7 1034.4 32.8 1067.2-20.0 C3 55 330.0 0.50 311.0 1788.8 839.7 2628.5 217.7 1252.1 34.6 1286.7-21.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 282.7 2071.5 763.4 2834.9 197.9 1450.0 36.3 1486.3-22.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 282.7 2354.2 763.4 3117.6 197.9 1648.0 38.0 1686.0-23.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 282.7 2637.0 763.4 3400.4 197.9 1845.9 39.7 1885.6-24.0 C3 50 300.0 0.50 282.7 2919.7 763.4 3683.1 197.9 2043.8 41.5 2085.3-25.0 C4 19 114.0 0.50 107.4 3027.2 290.1 3317.3 75.2 2119.0 43.2 2162.2-26.0 C4 19 114.0 0.50 107.4 3134.6 290.1 3424.7 75.2 2194.2 44.9 2239.2-27.0 C4 20 120.0 0.50 113.1 3247.7 305.4 3553.1 79.2 2273.4 46.7 2320.1-28.0 C4 20 120.0 0.50 113.1 3360.8 305.4 3666.2 79.2 2352.6 48.4 2400.9-29.0 PT 40 240.0 0.50 226.2 3587.0 1017.9 4604.9 158.3 2510.9 50.1 2561.0-30.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3916.9 1484.4 5401.3 230.9 2741.8 51.8 2793.6-31.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 4246.7 1484.4 5731.1 230.9 2972.7 53.6 3026.3-32.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 4576.6 1484.4 6061.0 230.9 3203.6 55.3 3258.9-33.0 PT 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 4906.5 1484.4 6390.9 230.9 3434.5 57.0 3491.6-34.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 5236.3 1484.4 6720.7 230.9 3665.4 58.7 3724.2-35.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 5566.2 1484.4 7050.6 230.9 3896.3 60.5 3956.8-36.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 5896.1 1484.4 7380.5 230.9 4127.3 62.2 4189.5-37.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 6225.9 1484.4 7710.4 230.9 4358.2 63.9 4422.1-38.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 6555.8 1484.4 8040.2 230.9 4589.1 65.7 4654.7-39.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 6885.7 1484.4 8370.1 230.9 4820.0 67.4 4887.4-40.0 C5 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 7215.6 1484.4 8700.0 230.9 5050.9 69.1 5120.0

Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)

Page 120: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-4 Diameter : 0.6 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

1

1

8

25

45

50

55

50

50

50

19

20

40

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

1

1

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

PT

CLAYSTONE

CH

CH

Page 121: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-5

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.40 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.075 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.26 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.13 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.08 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 7.5 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 15.1 9.5 24.6 10.6 10.6 0.8 11.4-2.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 30.2 11.6 41.7 10.6 21.1 1.7 22.8-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 37.7 6.8 44.5 5.3 26.4 2.5 28.9-4.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 52.8 15.6 68.3 10.6 36.9 3.4 40.3-5.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 67.9 13.6 81.4 10.6 47.5 4.2 51.7-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 75.4 6.8 82.2 5.3 52.8 5.1 57.8-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 82.9 6.8 89.7 5.3 58.1 5.9 64.0-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 90.5 6.8 97.3 5.3 63.3 6.7 70.1-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 98.0 6.8 104.8 5.3 68.6 7.6 76.2-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 7.5 105.6 6.8 112.3 5.3 73.9 8.4 82.3-11.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 120.6 13.6 134.2 10.6 84.4 9.3 93.7-12.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 15.1 135.7 13.6 149.3 10.6 95.0 10.1 105.1-13.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 35.8 171.5 33.9 205.5 25.1 120.1 11.0 131.0-14.0 C2 4 24.0 1.00 30.2 201.7 27.1 228.8 21.1 141.2 11.8 153.0-15.0 C2 4 24.0 1.00 30.2 231.9 27.1 259.0 21.1 162.3 12.6 174.9-16.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 35.8 267.7 33.9 301.6 25.1 187.4 13.5 200.8-17.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 35.8 303.5 33.9 337.4 25.1 212.4 14.3 226.8-18.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 35.8 339.3 33.9 373.2 25.1 237.5 15.2 252.7-19.0 C2 7 42.0 0.83 43.8 383.1 47.5 430.6 30.7 268.2 16.0 284.2-20.0 C2 7 42.0 0.83 43.8 426.9 47.5 474.4 30.7 298.8 16.8 315.7-21.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 646.8 659.7 1306.6 153.9 452.8 17.7 470.5-22.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 866.7 659.7 1526.5 153.9 606.7 18.5 625.2-23.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1086.6 659.7 1746.4 153.9 760.6 19.4 780.0-24.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1306.6 659.7 1966.3 153.9 914.6 20.2 934.8-25.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1526.5 659.7 2186.2 153.9 1068.5 21.1 1089.6-26.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1746.4 659.7 2406.1 153.9 1222.5 21.9 1244.4-27.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 1966.3 659.7 2626.0 153.9 1376.4 22.7 1399.1-28.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2186.2 659.7 2845.9 153.9 1530.3 23.6 1553.9-29.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2406.1 659.7 3065.8 153.9 1684.3 24.4 1708.7-30.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 219.9 2626.0 659.7 3285.8 153.9 1838.2 25.3 1863.5

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 122: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-5 Diameter : 0.4 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

1

2

5

4

5

5

7

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

2

2

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 123: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-5

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.45 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.080 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.41 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.16 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.09 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 9.5 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 17.0 12.1 29.0 11.9 11.9 1.0 12.9-2.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 33.9 14.6 48.5 11.9 23.8 2.0 25.8-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 42.4 8.6 51.0 5.9 29.7 3.1 32.8-4.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 59.4 19.7 79.1 11.9 41.6 4.1 45.7-5.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 76.3 17.2 93.5 11.9 53.4 5.1 58.6-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 84.8 8.6 93.4 5.9 59.4 6.1 65.5-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 93.3 8.6 101.9 5.9 65.3 7.2 72.5-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 101.8 8.6 110.4 5.9 71.3 8.2 79.4-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 110.3 8.6 118.9 5.9 77.2 9.2 86.4-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 8.5 118.8 8.6 127.3 5.9 83.1 10.2 93.4-11.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 135.7 17.2 152.9 11.9 95.0 11.3 106.3-12.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 17.0 152.7 17.2 169.9 11.9 106.9 12.3 119.2-13.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 40.3 193.0 42.9 235.9 28.2 135.1 13.3 148.4-14.0 C2 4 24.0 1.00 33.9 226.9 34.4 261.3 23.8 158.8 14.3 173.2-15.0 C2 4 24.0 1.00 33.9 260.8 34.4 295.2 23.8 182.6 15.3 197.9-16.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 40.3 301.1 42.9 344.1 28.2 210.8 16.4 227.2-17.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 40.3 341.4 42.9 384.4 28.2 239.0 17.4 256.4-18.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 40.3 381.7 42.9 424.6 28.2 267.2 18.4 285.6-19.0 C2 7 42.0 0.83 49.3 431.0 60.1 491.1 34.5 301.7 19.4 321.1-20.0 C2 7 42.0 0.83 49.3 480.3 60.1 540.4 34.5 336.2 20.5 356.6-21.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 727.7 835.0 1562.6 173.2 509.4 21.5 530.8-22.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 975.1 835.0 1810.0 173.2 682.5 22.5 705.1-23.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1222.5 835.0 2057.4 173.2 855.7 23.5 879.3-24.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1469.9 835.0 2304.8 173.2 1028.9 24.5 1053.5-25.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1717.3 835.0 2552.3 173.2 1202.1 25.6 1227.7-26.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 1964.7 835.0 2799.7 173.2 1375.3 26.6 1401.9-27.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2212.1 835.0 3047.1 173.2 1548.5 27.6 1576.1-28.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2459.5 835.0 3294.5 173.2 1721.6 28.6 1750.3-29.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2706.9 835.0 3541.9 173.2 1894.8 29.7 1924.5-30.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 247.4 2954.3 835.0 3789.3 173.2 2068.0 30.7 2098.7

Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)

Page 124: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-5 Diameter : 0.45 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

1

2

5

4

5

5

7

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

2

2

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 125: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-5

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.50 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.090 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.57 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.20 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.12 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 11.8 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 18.8 14.9 33.8 13.2 13.2 1.3 14.5-2.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 37.7 18.0 55.7 13.2 26.4 2.6 28.9-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 47.1 10.6 57.7 6.6 33.0 3.8 36.8-4.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 66.0 24.3 90.3 13.2 46.2 5.1 51.3-5.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 84.8 21.2 106.0 13.2 59.4 6.4 65.8-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 94.2 10.6 104.9 6.6 66.0 7.7 73.6-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 103.7 10.6 114.3 6.6 72.6 8.9 81.5-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 113.1 10.6 123.7 6.6 79.2 10.2 89.4-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 122.5 10.6 133.1 6.6 85.8 11.5 97.2-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 9.4 131.9 10.6 142.6 6.6 92.4 12.8 105.1-11.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 150.8 21.2 172.0 13.2 105.6 14.0 119.6-12.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 18.8 169.6 21.2 190.9 13.2 118.8 15.3 134.1-13.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 44.8 214.4 53.0 267.4 31.3 150.1 16.6 166.7-14.0 C2 4 24.0 1.00 37.7 252.1 42.4 294.5 26.4 176.5 17.9 194.3-15.0 C2 4 24.0 1.00 37.7 289.8 42.4 332.2 26.4 202.9 19.1 222.0-16.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 44.8 334.6 53.0 387.6 31.3 234.2 20.4 254.6-17.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 44.8 379.3 53.0 432.4 31.3 265.5 21.7 287.2-18.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 44.8 424.1 53.0 477.1 31.3 296.9 23.0 319.8-19.0 C2 7 42.0 0.83 54.8 478.9 74.2 553.1 38.3 335.2 24.2 359.4-20.0 C2 7 42.0 0.83 54.8 533.6 74.2 607.9 38.3 373.5 25.5 399.0-21.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 808.5 1030.8 1839.4 192.4 566.0 26.8 592.7-22.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1083.4 1030.8 2114.2 192.4 758.4 28.1 786.4-23.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1358.3 1030.8 2389.1 192.4 950.8 29.3 980.1-24.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1633.2 1030.8 2664.0 192.4 1143.2 30.6 1173.8-25.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 1908.1 1030.8 2938.9 192.4 1335.7 31.9 1367.5-26.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 2183.0 1030.8 3213.8 192.4 1528.1 33.2 1561.2-27.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 2457.9 1030.8 3488.7 192.4 1720.5 34.4 1754.9-28.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 2732.8 1030.8 3763.6 192.4 1912.9 35.7 1948.6-29.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3007.6 1030.8 4038.5 192.4 2105.3 37.0 2142.3-30.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 274.9 3282.5 1030.8 4313.4 192.4 2297.8 38.3 2336.0

Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction

Page 126: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-5 Diameter : 0.5 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

1

2

5

4

5

5

7

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

2

2

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 127: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAU Pile type : PC PILE Calculation method: NOTE:Ref. : BH-5 Diameter : 0.6 m Based on N-SPT

Ult. Compression (kN)

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

FrictionEndQu

Ult. Pull Out (kN)

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (m

)

Friction*WpQpu

N-SPT

1

1

1

1

2

5

4

5

5

7

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

2

2

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

00 20 40 60 80 100

Dep

th (m

)

CH

CH

CLAYSTONE

Page 128: Report Soil Investigation Tanjung Redeb

Project : TANJUNG REDEP, BERAURef. : BH-5

Pile PropertiesType : PC PILE Calc. Method : Based on N-SPTDiameter : 0.60 m cu = 6.00 *N-SPTThick. : 0.100 m CompressionPerimeter : 1.88 m Skin Friction (Qs) = α*cu*perimeter*l (c-soil)Areaout : 0.28 m2 = 2*N-SPT*perimeter*l (φ-soil)Areapile : 0.16 m2 End Bearing (Qp) = Nc*cu*area (c-soil)Unit weight : 21.00 kN = 40*N-SPTav*l/D (φ-soil)

≤ 400*N-SPTavUltimate (Qu) = Qs + Qp

Pull outSkin Friction (Qs) = 0.7 *Qs (Compression)Pile weight (Wp) = Areapile * Unit weight of Pile * lUltimate (Qpu) = Qs + Wp

Depth (m) cu

(kN/m2) Local Cumm. Local Cumm.0.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 0.0 0.0 17.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 22.6 21.5 44.1 15.8 15.8 1.7 17.6-2.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 45.2 26.0 71.2 15.8 31.7 3.5 35.1-3.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 56.5 15.3 71.8 7.9 39.6 5.2 44.8-4.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 79.2 35.0 114.2 15.8 55.4 6.9 62.3-5.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 101.8 30.5 132.3 15.8 71.3 8.6 79.9-6.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 113.1 15.3 128.4 7.9 79.2 10.4 89.5-7.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 124.4 15.3 139.7 7.9 87.1 12.1 99.2-8.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 135.7 15.3 151.0 7.9 95.0 13.8 108.8-9.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 147.0 15.3 162.3 7.9 102.9 15.6 118.5-10.0 C1 1 6.0 1.00 11.3 158.3 15.3 173.6 7.9 110.8 17.3 128.1-11.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 181.0 30.5 211.5 15.8 126.7 19.0 145.7-12.0 C1 2 12.0 1.00 22.6 203.6 30.5 234.1 15.8 142.5 20.7 163.2-13.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 53.7 257.3 76.3 333.6 37.6 180.1 22.5 202.6-14.0 C2 4 24.0 1.00 45.2 302.5 61.1 363.6 31.7 211.8 24.2 236.0-15.0 C2 4 24.0 1.00 45.2 347.8 61.1 408.8 31.7 243.4 25.9 269.4-16.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 53.7 401.5 76.3 477.8 37.6 281.0 27.6 308.7-17.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 53.7 455.2 76.3 531.6 37.6 318.7 29.4 348.0-18.0 C2 5 30.0 0.95 53.7 508.9 76.3 585.3 37.6 356.3 31.1 387.4-19.0 C2 7 42.0 0.83 65.7 574.6 106.9 681.5 46.0 402.3 32.8 435.1-20.0 C2 7 42.0 0.83 65.7 640.4 106.9 747.2 46.0 448.3 34.6 482.8-21.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 970.2 1484.4 2454.6 230.9 679.2 36.3 715.4-22.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 1300.1 1484.4 2784.5 230.9 910.1 38.0 948.1-23.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 1630.0 1484.4 3114.4 230.9 1141.0 39.7 1180.7-24.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 1959.8 1484.4 3444.2 230.9 1371.9 41.5 1413.4-25.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 2289.7 1484.4 3774.1 230.9 1602.8 43.2 1646.0-26.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 2619.6 1484.4 4104.0 230.9 1833.7 44.9 1878.6-27.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 2949.4 1484.4 4433.8 230.9 2064.6 46.7 2111.3-28.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3279.3 1484.4 4763.7 230.9 2295.5 48.4 2343.9-29.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3609.2 1484.4 5093.6 230.9 2526.4 50.1 2576.5-30.0 C3 100 350.0 0.50 329.9 3939.0 1484.4 5423.4 230.9 2757.3 51.8 2809.2

Soil Properties

Layer α

Compression Capacity (kN)

End QuN-SPT Friction Friction* Wp Qpu

Pull Out Capacity (kN)