Top Banner
1 P.O. Box 342-01000 Thika Email: [email protected] Web: www.mku.ac.ke DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS STUDIES COURSE CODE: BBM411 COURSE TITLE: COMPANY LAW Patrick Kibati-0722-577701
196

Bbm4101 Company Law

Jul 16, 2016

Download

Documents

Duncan Opiyo

company law
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Bbm4101 Company Law

1

P.O. Box 342-01000 Thika

Email: [email protected]

Web: www.mku.ac.ke

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS STUDIES

COURSE CODE: BBM411

COURSE TITLE: COMPANY LAW

Patrick Kibati-0722-577701

Page 2: Bbm4101 Company Law

2

C O U R S E O U T L I N E

Purpose of the course

To prepare students for such aspects of law as will touch their business operations so that

they can play a practical role in the field of commercial enterprise in the community and

nation as a whole.

Course outcomes

By the end of the course unit, the learner should be able to:-

Explain features of a company as a legal person

Describe the procedure of forming a company

Describe the procedure of holding a statutory meeting

Explain the general running of a company

Course Content

Lesson one: the company as a form of business organization

Meaning of company

Classification of companies

Registration procedures

Effect of registration

Meaning of incorporation

Practical consequences of registration

Disadvantages of incorporation

Lifting the corporate veil

Lesson 2: memorandum of association

Meaning and importance

The purposes of memorandum

The contents of memorandum

The alteration of the memorandum

Doctrine of ultra vires

Lesson 3: articles of association

Meaning of articles of association

The contents of articles of association

Alteration of articles of association

The constructive notice of memorandum and articles

Page 3: Bbm4101 Company Law

3

The doctrine of indoor management

The rule royal brutish bank v turquand

The exceptions to the doctrine of indoor management

Lesson 4: The promoters

Meaning of promoters

The functions of promoters.

Legal status of a promoter

Fiduciary position of a promoter

Duty of promoter as regards prospectus

Remuneration of promoters

Pre – incorporation or preliminary contracts

Position of promoters as regards pre – incorporation contracts

Ratification of a pre-incorporation contract

Lesson 5: prospectus

Meaning of prospectus

Purpose of a prospectus

The form and contents of a prospectus

The report to be set out in prospectus

Lesson 6: Flotations

Meaning of floatation

The methods of public issue

Lesson 7: distribution of company’s powers

The directors‟ powers

How the board meetings are conducted

The role of the chairman in a company

The delegation of directors‟ powers

Powers, remuneration and removal of the managing director

The qualifications ,legal status and liabilities of the company secretary

The directors vis members in general meetings

CAT

Lesson 8: the law of meeting

The meaning of meeting

Importance of company meetings

Classification of company meetings

The requisites of a valid meeting

Lesson 9: share capital

Meaning of share capital

Page 4: Bbm4101 Company Law

4

Types of types of share capital

Classes of shares

Meaning of stocks

Alteration of capital

Variation of shareholders rights

Lesson 10: majority rights and minority protection

Meaning of majority power

Meaning of the principle of majority rule

Protection of minority shareholders or exception to the rules in Foss-v- Harbottle

Lesson 11: accounts and auditors

Requirements of what should be captured by the books of account

The various financial statements that should be presented to the shareholders

The manner of presentation of group accounts to the shareholders

In the manner of appointment ,remuneration and disqualification of the auditors

Lesson 12: investigation of a company’s affairs

Explain the process of investigation into a company‟s affairs

Explain the process of investigation of company‟s membership

Explain the alternative power of registrar in matters of company investigation

Lesson 13: winding-up

The meaning of winding up

The process of winding up by the court

The process of voluntary winding up

The process of creditors‟ voluntary winding up

The process of winding up subject to supervision

Lesson 14: companies and the stock exchange

The reasons for listing in the stock exchange

The major benefits of listing at the stock exchange

The Nairobi stock exchange market segments

Listing requirements at the Nairobi stock exchange general eligibility

requirements for public offering of shares and listing

The responsibilities of a listed institution

The role of the capital markets authority

Teaching learning methodologies:

Lectures and tutorials; group discussion; demonstration; individual assignment; Case

studies.

Page 5: Bbm4101 Company Law

5

Course assessment

Cats 20 %

Assignments 10%

Final exam 70%

Total 100%

Instructional materials and equipment:

Projector, text books, design catalogues, computer laboratory, design software, simulators.

Recommended text books:

Gordon & Barrie, Commercial Law

C.R Newton, General Principles Of Law

Textbooks for further reading

C. Hamblin And F. Wright, Introduction To Commercial Law

Other support materials:

Various applicable manuals and journals, variety of electronic information resources as

prescribed by the lecturer.

Other support materials:

Various applicable manuals and journals, variety of electronic information resources as

prescribed by the lecturer.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LESSON ONE: THE COMPANY AS A FORM OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATION

Page

Page 6: Bbm4101 Company Law

6

1.1 The Nature Of The Company………………………………………………….10

1.2 Classification Of Companies…………………………………………………. 11

1.3 Registration Procedures……………………………………………………......13

1.4 Effect Of Registration………………………………………………………….15

1.5 Incorporation ………………………………………………………………......17

1.6 Advantages Of Incorporation ……………………………………………..........20

1.7 Disadvantages Of Incorporation……………………………………………......22

1.8 Lifting The Corporate Veil………………………………………………….….23

LESSON 2: MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION

2.1 Meaning And Importance.....................................................................................31

2.2 Purposes Of Memorandum...................................................................................32

2.3 Preparation Of Memorandum Of Association......................................................32

2.4 Contents Of Memorandum...................................................................................32

2.5 Alteration Of The Memorandum..........................................................................40

2.6 Doctrine Of Ultra Vires........................................................................................40

LESSON 3: ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

3.1 Meaning Of Articles Of Association....................................................................44

3.2 Contents Of Articles Of Association ...................................................................46

3.3 Alteration Of Articles Of Association..................................................................47

3.4 Constructive Notice Of Memorandum And Articles............................................49

3.5 Doctrine Of Indoor Management..........................................................................50

3.6 The Rule Royal British Bank V Turquand........................................................... 51

3.7 Exceptions To The Doctrine Of Indoor Management......................................... .53

LESSON 4: PROMOTERS

4.1 Definition Of Promoters................................................................................... ...56

Page 7: Bbm4101 Company Law

7

4.2 Functions Of Promoters.......................................................................................58

4.3 Legal Status Of A Promoter.................................................................................58

4.4 Fiduciary Position Of A Promoter........................................................................58

4.5 Duty Of Promoter As Regards Prospectus............................................................61

4.6 Remuneration Of Promoters.................................................................................64

4.7 Pre – Incorporation Or Preliminary Contracts......................................................65

4.8 Position Of Promoters As Regards Pre – Incorporation Contracts ......................66

4.9 Ratification Of A Pre-Incorporation Contract .....................................................66

LESSON 5: PROSPECTUS

5.1 Definition Of Prospectus.......................................................................................69

5.2 Purpose Of A Prospectus......................................................................................69

5.3 Form And Contents Of A Prospectus....................................................................72

5.4 Report To Be Set Out In Prospectus.......................................................................74

LESSON 6: FLOTATIONS

6.1 Definition Of Floatation..........................................................................................77

6.2 Methods Of Public Issue..........................................................................................77

LESSON 7: DISTRIBUTION OF COMPANY’S POWERS

7.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................82

7.2 Exercise Of Directors‟ Powers................................................................................82

7.3 Board Meetings........................................................................................................82

7.4 Notice Of Board Meeting ........................................................................................83

7.5 Quorum At Board Meeting......................................................................................85

7.6 „Disinterested‟ Quorum............................................................................................85

7.7 The Chairman.................................................................................................85

7.8 Voting At Board Meetings .............................................................................85

7.9 Powers Of The Chairman................................................................................86

Page 8: Bbm4101 Company Law

8

7.9 Delegation........................................................................................................87

7.11 Managing Director.........................................................................................87

7.12 Powers Of Managing Director.......................................................................87

7.13 Remuneration ................................................................................................88

7.14 Removal.........................................................................................................88

7.15 The Company Secretary.................................................................................88

7.16 Powers And Duties Of The Company Secretary............................................90

7.17 Legal Status Of The Secretary........................................................................90

7.18 Liability Of The Secretary..............................................................................91

7.19 Directors Vis Members In General Meetings ................................................91

LESSON 8: THE LAW OF MEETING

8.1 Meaning Of Meeting..........................................................................................96

8.2 Importance Of Company Meetings ...................................................................97

8.3 Classification Of Company Meetings................................................................98

8.3.1 Meetings Of Shareholders...............................................................................98

8.3.2) Meeting Of The Board Of Directors............................................................108

8.3.3) Meeting Of Debentures Holders...................................................................109

8.3.4) Meeting Of Creditors....................................................................................109

8.3.5) Meeting Of Creditors And Contribution On Winding Up............................109

8.4) Requisites Of A Valid Meeting........................................................................110

LESSON 9: SHARE CAPITAL

9.1 Meaning Of Share Capital.................................................................................127

9.2 Types Of Share Capital .....................................................................................127

9.3 Classes Of Shares...............................................................................................129

9.4 Stocks..................................................................................................................135

9.5 Alteration Of Capital...................................................................................137

9.6 Variation Of Shareholders Rights...............................................................141

9.7 Prohibition Of Financial Assistance............................................................142

Page 9: Bbm4101 Company Law

9

LESSON 10: MAJORITY RIGHTS AND MINORITY PROTECTION

10.1 Majority Power...........................................................................................144

10.2 The Principle Of Majority Rule..................................................................144

LESSON 11: ACCOUNTS AND AUDITORS

11.1 Introduction..................................................................................................151

11.2 Books Of Account........................................................................................151

11.3 Audit Of Accounts........................................................................................154

LESSON 12: INVESTIGATION OF A COMPANY’S AFFAIRS

12.1 Investigation Into A Company‟s Affairs.......................................................160

12.2 Investigation Of Company‟s Membership....................................................164

12.3 Alternative Power Of Registrar.....................................................................165

LESSON 13: WINDING-UP

13.1 Meaning Of Winding Up................................................................................165

13.2 Modes Of Winding Up...................................................................................168

13.2.1 Winding Up By The Court..........................................................................168

13.2.2 Voluntary Winding Up................................................................................177

13.3.3 Creditors‟ Voluntary Winding Up...............................................................179

13.3.4 Winding Up Subject To Supervision............................................................180

LESSON 14: COMPANIES AND THE STOCK EXCHANGE

Page 10: Bbm4101 Company Law

10

14.1 Reasons For Listing In The Stock Exchange.........................................................184

14.2 Major Benefits Of Listing......................................................................................184

14.3 The Nairobi Stock Exchange Market Segments ...................................................185

14.4 Listing Requirements At The Nairobi Stock Exchange ........................................185

14.4.1 Main Investment Market Segment (MIMS)........................................................185

12.4.2 Alternative Investment Market Segment (AIMS)...............................................186

14.4.3 Fixed Income Securities Market Segment (FISMS)...........................................188

14.4.4 General Eligibility Requirements For Public Offering Of Shares And Listing..189

14.5 Disclosure Of Periodic Financial Information ......................................................190

14.6 Communications With Shareholders .....................................................................191

14.7 Responsibilities Of A Listed Institution.................................................................191

14.8 Role Of The Capital Markets Authority.................................................................192

LESSON ONE: THE COMPANY AS A FORM OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATION

Expected Learning outcomes

Page 11: Bbm4101 Company Law

11

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Explain the meaning of company

b) Explain the classification of companies

c) Explain the registration procedures

d) Explain the effect of registration

e) Explain the meaning of incorporation

f) Describe the practical consequences of registration

g) Explain the disadvantages of incorporation

h) Explain the concept lifting the corporate veil

1.1 The Nature of the Company

There is no precise legal definition of „a company‟ .The word „company‟ is a by- product

of mercantile rather than legal ingenuity and was in use in England long before what is

now called „company law‟ came into existence

Although the word was initially used by English merchants to denote associations which

they had formed for trading overseas, such as the British East India Company and the

Hudson Bay Company, it was gradually extended with surprising latitude to diverse

association until it ceased to have a specific meaning. One major consequences of this

extension is that the English Company Law which has been adopted in Kenya defines or

classifies „companies‟ according to the mode of their formation rather than according to

their intrinsic attributes.

1.2 Classification of Companies

Page 12: Bbm4101 Company Law

12

Section 389 of the Companies Act provides that „‟no company, association or partnership

consisting of more than twenty persons shall; be formed ….. unless it is registered as a

company under this Act, or is formed in pursuance of some other Act, Act of the United

Kingdom or of letters patent‟‟.

Three types of companies are provided for under this section. They are:

a) Chartered companies

b) Statutory companies

c) Registered companies

a) Chartered companies

A chartered company is formed when the queen or King of England issue a charter, or

„letters patent‟, to a group of people who intend to carry on a business as a chartered

company. No such company can be formed in Kenya after political independence and the

words „letters patent‟ in s. 389 only serve as a reminder of the England origin of our

Companies Act which is the replica of the English Companies Act, 1948, with a few

minor modifications.

b) Statutory companies

Statutory companies are set up by specific Act of Parliament or under authority of an Act

of parliament by the state. The Act confers upon the statutory company corporate

personality to enable it to exist separate from the government.

In the past, the government established such companies under specific Act of parliament

e.g. Kenya Railways (set up under the Kenya Railways Corporations Act), the former

Kenya Post and Telecommunications (set up under the Kenya posts and

telecommunications Act which has since been repealed) and the Kenya ports Authority (

set up under the Kenya ports Authority Act). However, since the passing of the state

Corporation Act (Cap 446) law of Kenya, the government has moved towards formation

of state corporations under the Act.

Page 13: Bbm4101 Company Law

13

Section3 (1) of the Act provides that, the president may, by order, establish a state

corporation as a body corporate to perform the functions specified in the order. In this

regard many state corporations have been established through the authority of this Act as

fewer are being formed through specific Acts. Such state corporations are endowed with

perpetual succession; the ability to institute suits and being sued in their corporate name;

and capacity to hold and alienate movable and immovable property in accordance with

the Act.

The object of statutory corporations is set out in the Act which creates them or

the creating instrument which is usually an order from the president under the State

Corporations Act issued as a subsidiary legislation to the Act. Therefore a statutory

corporation can only carry out those functions for which it was created. Moreover the

capital of a statutory corporation is raised through borrowing, guaranteed by the

Treasury, or by Treasury. Its profits and gains are injected back into the corporation or

paid to the Treasury as dividend. When it makes loss and is unable to pay its debt it can

be sued and its property attached to settle a judgment of the court but it cannot be wound

up on the grounds that it is unable to pay its debts as happens in registered companies.

Such statutory corporations are would up on the repeal or revocation of the parent statute.

c) Registered companies

A registered company is formed by registration under the companies Act. It is this type of

company that people usually have in mind when they talk of „a company‟. The note that

follow are concerned exclusively with „registered companies‟. It should be noted that s.2

of the Companies Act defines a company as „„a company formed and registered under

this Act’’.

Classification of registered companies

Registered companies are classified by s.4 (1) of the companies Act into:

a) A company formed by „‟any seven or more persons‟‟. Such a company is known as

a public company.

Page 14: Bbm4101 Company Law

14

b) A company formed by „‟any two or more person‟‟. Such a company is referred to in

the Act as „‟a private company‟‟.

A private company or a public company may be:

(i) Limited by shares if the liability of its members is limited by its

memorandum to the amount, if any, unpaid on the shares, respectively

held by the

(ii) Limited by guarantee if the liability of its members is limited by its

memorandum to an amount which the members have undertaken to

contribute to the assets of the company in the event of its being would

up.

(iii)Unlimited if it does not have any limit on the liability of its members.

1.3 Registration procedures

The procedures to be followed by persons who intend to form a registered company will

depend on whether the proposed company is to a public company or a private company.

a) Public company

The initial step that must be taken by promoters who are desirous of forming a public

company is the preparation of a document called the memorandum of association to

which at least seven of them will subscribe their names as prescribed by s. 4 of the Act.

The memorandum must contain a declaration by the promoters that they are desirous of

being formed into a company pursued thereto and must state:

a) The name of the company, with „limited‟ as the last word of the name of the company

in the case of a company limited by shares or by guarantee; and

b) That the registered office of the company is to be situated in Kenya; and

c) The object of the company; and

Page 15: Bbm4101 Company Law

15

d) In the case of a company having a share capital, the amount of capital with which the

company is to be registered and the division of the capital into shares of a fixed amount

(unless the company is unlimited company).

The memorandum of a company limited by shares or by guarantee must also state that the

liability of the company‟s members is limited. The memorandum of a company limited

by guarantee shall also state the amount „guaranteed‟ by each member of the company.

The memorandum must also contain a clause declaring that the promoters desire to form

a company pursuant thereto this clause is known as „the association clause‟.

The next step is the delivery of the memorandum to the Registrar of Companies

together with some or all of the following documents.

i) Articles of association

This document contains the regulations for management of a company.

(ii) Consent to act as director

If any person is appointed director of the company, the person must indicate his consent

to act as director.

(iii) List of persons who have consented to be directors (form No 210)

This form, when duly completed and signed, constitutes the statutory list of the persons

who have given their individual consents in form no 209.

(iv) Statement of the nominal share capital

This statement is delivered for taxation purposes

(v)Declaration of compliance with the registration requirements

(vi) Notice of the situation of registered office

A promoter should fill a form issued by the registrar that sets out the details relating to

the physical and postal address of the registered office of the proposed company.

Page 16: Bbm4101 Company Law

16

Registration

If the aforesaid documents are correctly prepared in accordance with the provisions of the

Companies Act, the Registrar grants a certificate of incorporation and the company is

formed from the date of incorporation written in the certificate.

b) Private company

In order to secure the registration of a private company the procedure described above is

followed except that:

(a) The memorandum of association will be signed by at least two of the company‟s

promoters.

Significance of registration

S. 16(2) provides that „‟no company, association or partnership consisting of more than

twenty persons shall be formed …. Unless it is registered as a company under this Act „.

The provision has been interpreted by the English and Kenyan courts to the effect that

registration is the condition precedent to the formation of a registered company and

failure to register a proposed company will mean that it does not legally exist.

1.4 Effect of registration

Companies incorporated in Kenya

S. 16(2) of the Act provides that „‟from the date of incorporation mentioned in the

certificate of incorporation the subscribers to the memorandum of association…. Shall

be a body corporate by the name contained in the memorandum‟‟. This section has been

judicially explained as follows:

(a) The date mentioned (i.e. written) in the certificate of incorporation is the date from

which the company‟s legal existence commences. Consequently, if an incorrect date is

written in the certificate, that date would be regarded as the actual date on which the

company was registered.

Page 17: Bbm4101 Company Law

17

(b) The company‟s registration constitutes it „a body corporate‟. It becomes „a legal

person „, or‟ corpora corporate‟, whose name is the name chosen for it by its promoters

and written in its memorandum of association. The certificate of incorporation may

therefore be regarded as the company‟s birth certificate and the date written therein as

the company‟s birthday.

Companies incorporated outside Kenya

Section 366 provides that if a foreign company after the appointed date of the Act

establishes a place of business within Kenya shall, within thirty days of the establishment

of the place of business deliver to the registrar for registration:

(a) A certified copy of the charter , statutes or memorandum and articles of the

company or other instrument constituting or defining the constitution of the

company, and ,if the instrument is not written in the English language , a certified

translation thereof;

(b) A list of the directors and secretary of the company containing the following

particulars;

(i) In the case of the individual, his present Christian name and surname and

any former Christian name or surname , his usual postal address, his

nationality and his business occupation, if any; and.

(ii) In the case of a corporation, its corporate name and registered or principal

office, and its postal address.

(iii) Where all the partners in a firm are joint secretaries of the company, the

name and principal office of the firm may be stated instead of their

particulars.

(c) the names and postal addresses of someone or more persons resident in Kenya

authorized to accept on behalf of the company service of process and any notices

required to be served on the company; and

(d) The full address of the registered or principal office of the company.

Once the foreign company has delivered to the registrar the documents mentioned

in s. 366, the registrar shall, if such documents and particulars are so delivered

Page 18: Bbm4101 Company Law

18

after the appointed day, certify under his hand that the company has complied

with the provisions of s. 366; and shall be conclusive evidence that the company

is registered as a foreign company for the purpose of the Act.

Section 3336(2) provides that once a foreign company has delivered to the

registrar the documents and particulars mentioned in s.366, it shall have the same

power to hold land in Kenya as if it were a company incorporated under this Act.

The concept of a registered company as „a person‟ was consummated in the

celebrated case of Solomon v $ Co Ltd (3) and its practical consequences are

enumerated below

1.5 Incorporation

This is the process by which legal persons are created .Osborne‟s Concise Law

Dictionary defines incorporation as a “merging together to form a single whole ;

conferring legal personality upon an association of individual, or the holder of a certain

office, pursuant to Royal Charter or Act of Parliament.”

For purpose of company law it denotes the legal process by which a group of

people are constituted and then enabled to carry on a business in such a way that the

business is legally regarded as „a legal entity‟ that is altogether separated from the

members of the group, individually and collectively. This mode of carrying on a business

is resorted to because it has certain legal advantages, some of which are explained under

„partnership‟, below. The business so incorporated is usually called „a company‟.

Practical consequences of registration

In the cause of delivering his judgment in Solomon’s case Lord Halsbury stated

that „‟once the company is incorporated, it must be treated like any other

independent person with rights and liability appropriate to itself. This means that

the company, as an independent person, has right and obligations which are not

the same as the rights and obligations of the subscribers to it memorandum and

the other persons who will join it later as its member. This is the fundamental

Page 19: Bbm4101 Company Law

19

attribute of corporate personality which is given practical effect in the following

ways.

a) Limited liability

The fact that a registered company is a different person altogether from the

subscriber to its memorandum and its other members means that the company‟s

debts are not the debts of its members. If the company has borrowed money, it

and it alone is under an obligation to repay the loan. The members are under no

such obligation and cannot be asked to repay be the loan. This is illustrated by the

case of Salomon v Salomon $ Co Ltd (1897) below:

In this case, Salomon sold his boots business to a newly formed company for £

30,000. His wife, one daughter and four sons took up one share of £ 1 each

.Solomon took 23,000 shares of £ 1 and £ 10,000 debentures in the company.

The debentures gave Salomon a charge over the assets of the company as the

consideration of the transfer of the business. Subsequently, when the company

was wound up, its assets were found to be worth £ 6,000 and its liabilities

amounted to £ 17,000 of which £ 10,000 were due to Salomon (secured by

debentures) and £ 7,000 of which due to unsecured creditors. The unsecured

creditors claimed that Salomon and the company was one and the same person

and that the company was a mere agent for Salomon and hence they should be

paid in priority to Salomon. It was held that the company was, in the eyes of the

law, a separate person independent from and was not his agent, though initially

the holder of all the shares of the company was also a secured creditor, and was

entitled to repayment in priority to the unsecured creditors.

In his celebrated passage, Lord Machaghten observed in this case.

“The company is a in law a different person altogether from the subscribers of the

memorandum and, though it may be that after incorporation the business is

precisely the same as it was before and the same persons are managers, and the

same hands receive the profits; the company is not in law the agent of the

Page 20: Bbm4101 Company Law

20

subscribers or trustee for them. Nor are the subscribers‟ liable in any shape or

form except to the extent and in the manner provided by the Act.”

In case a company is unable to pay its debts the creditors, or a creditor, may

petition the High Court for an order to wind it up. During the winding up the

members will be called upon to pay the amount , if any , which is unpaid on the

shares they held , in the case of a company limited by shares, or the amount

prescribed by the memorandum , in the case of a company limited by guarantee ,

as provided in s 4(2) of the Act.

It should be noted that, in the case for company limited by shares, what the

members are paying are the amounts they owe to the company as its debtors in

respect of shares that were sold to them on credit and have not been paid for in

full. The company‟s liquidator will in turn use the money so paid to pay off, or

reduce, the company‟s debts.

The other point to be noted is that a company‟s creditor cannot institute legal

proceedings against a company‟s member in order to recover from him what he is

owed by the company. This is because the members do not, legally, become his

debtor merely because the company is his debtor.

b) Perpetual succession

According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary, „perpetual‟ means , inter alia,

„‟applicable , valid, for ever or for indefinite time „‟ while „succession‟ means „‟a

following in order „‟. When used in relation to registered companies the phrase‟

perpetual succession‟ denotes a process whereby a company‟s membership

changes in definite order prescribed by the company‟s articles and goes on

changing for an indefinite period of time until the company‟s liquidation. The

„perpetual succession‟ occurs because a company and its members are separate

persons and so the company‟s legal life is not terminated by a member‟s death.

Page 21: Bbm4101 Company Law

21

c) Owning of property

Under s. (2) of the Act a registered company, as person, has power to own

movable and immovable property. It can actually do so if it can afford to buy

them, or receive them as a gift. But it is important to not that, legally, the

company‟s property does not belong to the members, either individually or as

group. It belongs to the company alone. Any member who uses the company‟s

money to purchase personal items or discharge personal obligations will be liable

to the company for conversion (theft). This rule applies irrespective of whether

the company is of a class popularly refers to as a „one –man company‟.

d) Suing and being sued

Because a company is at law a different person altogether from its members it

follows that a wrong to, or by, the company does not legally constitute a wrong to,

or, the company‟s members. Consequently:

(a) A member or members cannot institute legal proceeding to redress a wrong to

the company. The company as the injured party is, generally speaking, the

proper plaintiff.

(b) A member cannot be used to redress a wrong by the company.

1.6 Advantages of incorporation

1. Limited Liability

The liability of all the members of a limited company is limited to the nominal

amount of their shares therein. In Jenkin vs. Pharmaceutical Society of Great

Britain (1921) Ich. 392 it was observed that “limited companies are

offspring‟s of a proven necessity, that is that men should be entitled to engage

in a commercial pursuit without involving the whole of their fortune in that

particular pursuit in which they are engaged. This is the crux of limited

liability. This enables even not too enterprising people to invest part of their

Page 22: Bbm4101 Company Law

22

money in industrial ventures carried on by limited companies because they

know beforehand than their liability is limited.

2. Transferability of Shares

Shares in a company can be transferred (subject to any restrictions in the

Articles of Association) from one person to another without the consent of the

other members.

3. Separate Legal Entity

A company as is already illustrated both by the Act and case law, has separate

legal entity from its members and its existence is not affected by the death,

insanity or bankruptcy of a member i.e. a company has perpetual; succession.

Members will always come and go but the company will continue to exist.

4. Control

The control of a company can be secured by the acquisition of the majority of

the company‟s shares which carry the voting power.

5. Permanent Existence

The life of the company is permanent. The Company Act creates the company

and can dissolve it. The death, insolvency or the transfer of shares of members

does not affect the existence of the company. It may be stated that, “members

may come, members may go; but the company goes on for ever”.

6. Separation of Ownership and Management

The shareholders, who are the owners of the company, cannot participate in

the management of company‟s business. They can elect their representatives

to the Board of Directors, which manages the affairs of the company. This has

led to the recognition of the fact that ownership and management of business

functions.

7. Experts Management

Since a company carries a business on a large scale and has huge financial

resources, it can afford the services of the experts. This will lead towards

Page 23: Bbm4101 Company Law

23

professionalisation of management which is necessary for the efficient

management of any business.

8. Public Confidence

The formation and running of a company is regulated by the provisions of

Companies Act and various other acts. The provisions regarding appointment

and remuneration of directors, compulsory audit and publication of accounts,

protection of minority shareholders and so have created greater public

confidence in companies.

9. Social Advantages

A company is also beneficial from the society‟s point of view. It mobilizes the

scattered savings of public and invests them in sound industrial and

commercial ventures. It provides employment to a large number of people.

Economics of large scale operations leads to economical use of national

resources and provisions of goods and services, to the public at cheaper prices.

1.7 Disadvantages of incorporation

1. Complicated Procedure and Cost

Formation of a registered company must comply with the requirements of the

Companies Act. The documents required for its formation e.g the Memorandum

of Association, the Article of Association, the prospectus of statement in lieu of

Prospectus etc, are usually drawn by legal experts who charge high fees for their

preparation. Thus, the task of incorporation is complicated and expensive unlike

other business forms like partnerships which may be formed easily and can even

be inferred from the conduct of the parties.

2. Publicity

There is no secrecy regarding the affairs of a company. Once the Memorandum

and Articles of Association and the prospectus have been filed with the Registrar

of Companies, they become public documents open to the inspection of the

public. This wide publicity may open the company economic sabotage by its

rivals.

Page 24: Bbm4101 Company Law

24

3. Administration

The administration of a company must comply with the requirements of the

Companies Act. Requirements pertain to the holding of general and statutory

meetings and returns of annual accounts. The accounts report and audit report also

require expenses thus administration of a company is more expensive than that of

partnership.

4. The Doctrine of Ultra Vires

The company can only carry on the business specified in its objects clause of the

Memorandum of Association. The operation of the doctrine ultra vires hinders the

company from investing in other forms business which might be more profitable.

5. Taxation

A company must pay corporate tax which is not required in the case partnership.

Taxation reduces the profits of the company.

6. Winding Up

The winding up of a company is widely published thus exposing the property of

the company to an insecure position.

1.8 Lifting the Corporate Veil

A company is a legal person and is distinct from its members. This principle is regarded

as a curtain, a veil or shield between the company and its members. This principle of

separate legal entity was established in the famous case of Salomon Vs Salomon & Co

Ltd. This precedent has been followed in a number of cases and it has come to be

regarded as a fundamental principle of company laws. This shows that once the company

is registered under the Act, there is a veil between the company and its members.

Following this principle, the courts in most cases have refused to go behind the curtain

and see who are the real persons composing the company.

But sometimes the necessity of the situation may compel the authorities to disregard the

corporate legal entity and look to individual members who are in fact the real beneficial

Page 25: Bbm4101 Company Law

25

owners of all corporate property, and this in fact is what is known as, “Lifting or Piercing

the Corporate Veil.” Thus the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil may be understood as

the identification of a company with its members and when the corporate veil is lifted the

individual members may be held liable for its acts or entitled to its property.

The courts will lift the corporate veil where it is essential to secure justice, where it is in

the public interest to do so or where it is for the benefit of revenue. But it must be kept in

mind that a separate legal entity is still the general rule. The corporate entity will be

disregarded only in exceptional cases. These cases are exceptions to the principle in

Salomon and Co Ltd. The various cases in which corporate veil has been lifted can

divided be divided into two:-

a. Lifting by the courts

b. Lifting by the Statute

These are explained as under:-

a) Lifting By the Courts

1. Determination of the Character of the company

A company may assume an enemy character when persons in de facto control of its

affairs are residents in an enemy country. In such a case, the court may examine the

character of persons in real control of the company and declare the company to be

an enemy company.

Daimler Co. Ltd vs. Continental Tyre & Rubber Co. Ltd (1916) A. C. 307.

A company was incorporated in England for the purpose of selling in England tyres

made in Germany by a German company which held the bulk of shares in the

English company. The holders of the remaining shares except one and all the

directors were German residents in Germany.

During the First World War, the English company commenced an action for

recovery of a trade debt. It was held that the company was an alien company and

Page 26: Bbm4101 Company Law

26

the payment of debt to it would amount to trading with the enemy and, therefore,

the company was not allowed to proceed with the action.

2. Prevention of Fraud or Improper Conduct

The court will refuse to uphold the separate existence of the company where it is

formed for a fraudulent purpose or to avoid legal obligations.

Professor Gower observed in this regard that the veil of a corporate body will be

lifted where the corporate personality is being blatantly used as a cloak for fraud or

improper conduct. Thus in the following case where a company was incorporated

as a device to conceal the identity of the perpetrators of the fraud the court

disregarded the corporate personality.

Jones vs Limpman (1962)

L agreed to sell a certain land to J. He subsequently changed his mind and to avoid

the specific performance of the contract he sold it to a company which was formed

specifically for the purpose. The company had L and the clerk of his solicitors as

the only members. J brought an action for the specific performance against L and

the company. The court looked to the reality of the situation ignored the transfer

and ordered that the company should convey the land to J.

3. Where the Company is a Sham

The court will lift the veil where the company is a mere cloak or sham i.e. where

the device of incorporation is used for some illegal or improper purpose. The

following case illustrates this point.

Guilford Motors Co. Ltd Vs Horne (1933):-

„Horne was appointed as a managing director of the plaintiff company on the

condition that he shall not at any time solicit or entice away the customers of the

company. He, however, formed a new company to carry on the same business. The

new company solicited the plaintiff‟s customers. An injunction was granted against

Page 27: Bbm4101 Company Law

27

both Horne and the Company. The court held the company was a mere cloak for

the purpose of enabling the defendant to commit a breach of his agreement against

solicitation”

4. Where the company is acting as the agent of the shareholders

When a company is acting as an agent of its shareholders or of another company, it

will be liable for its acts. However, it is a question of fact in each case whether the

company is acting as agent for its shareholders. There may be express agreement to

this effect or an agreement may be implied from the circumstances of each

particular case. Note the following case.

F.G. Film Ltd In Re (1953) I ALL E. R 615.

An American company financed the production of a film in India in the name of a

British company. The president of the American company held 90 per cent of the

capital of the British company. The Board of Trade of Great Britain refused to

register the film as a British film. It was held that the decision was valid in view of

the fact that British company acted merely as the agent or nominee of the American

company.

5. Protection of Revenue

The court may also lift the corporate veil in the interests of revenue. The court will

not hesitate to look behind the corporate veil where it is found that the company has

been formed for evasion of taxes. In such cases, the individual shareholders may be

held liable to pay income tax. The following case illustrates this point:-

Sir Dinshaw Maneckjee Petit, Re A. I. R. (1927) Bom. 371. D,

An assessee, who was receiving huge dividend and interest income, transferred his

investments to four private companies formed for the purpose of reducing his tax

liability. These companies transferred the income to D as a pretended loan. Held;

the companies were formed by D purely and simply as a means of avoiding tax

obligation and the companies were nothing more than the assessee himself. They

Page 28: Bbm4101 Company Law

28

did no business but were created simply as legal entities to ostensibly receive the

dividends and interest and to hand them over to D as pretended loans.

6. Protecting Public Policy

The Courts invariably lift the corporate veil to protect the public policy and prevent

transactions contrary to public policy. Thus where there is a conflict with the public

policy, the courts ignore the form and take into account the substance

b) Lifting by statute

1. Number of Members Below Statutory Minimum:

As per section 33 of the Act, when the company carries on business for more than

six months after its number of members is reduced below seven in the case of a

public company and below two in the case of a private company, person who is

cognizant of the fact and is a member during the time the company so carries on

business after these six months, is severally liable for all the debts of the company

contracted during that time. However, the members or members will enjoy the

privilege of limited liability for the six months. This section enables creditors to

look beyond the company to its members for satisfaction of their amounts.

2. Misdescription of the Company

Section 109 of the Act states that the name of the company must be fully and

properly mentioned on all documents issued by it. Where an officer of a company

signs, on behalf of the company, a bill of exchange, promissory note, cheque or

order for money or goods in which the company‟s name is not mentioned, the

officer is personally liable to the holder of the bill of exchange, etc for the amount

thereof unless it is paid by the company. The liability under this section is

illustrated by Hendon vs. Alderman 91973) 117 S. J. 631. The directors of L & R

Agencies Ltd signed a cheque in the name of the company stating the company‟s

name as L. R Agencies Ltd (omitting the word & from the name).It was held that

they were personally liable.

3. Holding and Subsidiary Companies

Page 29: Bbm4101 Company Law

29

In the eye of the law, the holding company and its subsidiary are separated legal

entities. Even a 100% subsidiary is a separate legal entity and its creator and

controller (ie the holding company) is not liable for its breaches of contracts and

torts. Nor can the holding company sue to enforce rights which belong to the

subsidiary

But in the following two cases, a subsidiary company may loose its separate

identity to a certain extent:

a. Where at the end of its financial year a company has subsidiaries, it must

lay before its members in general meeting not only its own account but

also a set of group accounts shoeing the profit or loss earned or suffered

by the holding company and its subsidiaries collectively and their

collective state of affairs at the end of the year

b. Section 167 empowers the inspector appointed by the court to regard the

subsidiary and the holding company as one entity for the purpose of

investigation.

4. Investigation of Company Membership

Section 173 (5) empowers the registrar to appoint one or more competent

inspectors to investigate and report on the membership of any company for the

purpose of determining the persons who are or have been financially interested in

the success or failure of the company or able to control or to influence the policy

of the company. This will be done by lifting the corporate veil so as to ascertain

the real persons controlling it.

5. Take – Over Bids

Section 210 provides that where a scheme or contract inviting the transfer of

shares or class of shares or class of shares in the company to another company has

been approved by the holders of not less than nine tenths in the value of shares

whose transfer is involved, the transferee company may, at any time within two

months after the making of the offer by the transferor company, give notice in the

prescribed manner to any dissenting share holder that it deserves to acquire his

shares.

Page 30: Bbm4101 Company Law

30

This is well illustrated in the case of Re. Bufle Press Ltd in which an offer made

by the company was regarded as having been made, in substance, by the company

members. The court thereby lifted the veil of incorporation by treating the

company and its members as one entity for he purpose of acceptances of the offer.

6. Fraudulent Conduct of Business

Section 323 of the Act states that if in the course of the winding up of a company

it appears that any business of the company has been carried on with intent to

defraud creditors, the court may declare that any person who were knowingly,

parties to the carrying on of such business are to be personally liable for the debts

and other liabilities of the company.

7 Prosecution of Delinquent Officers and Members of Company

Section 325 of the Act states that if in the course of a winding up of company it

appears that any past or present officer or any member of the company has been

guilty of any offence in relation to the company then the court may declare such a

person liable for his offence. In this case also, the corporate veil will be lifted.

Summary for the topic

Meaning of company

Classification of companies

Registration procedures

Effect of registration

Meaning of incorporation

Practical consequences of registration

Disadvantages of incorporation

Lifting the corporate veil

Page 31: Bbm4101 Company Law

31

Revision Questions

a) Explain the meaning of company

b) Explain the classification of companies

c) Explain the registration procedures

d) Explain the effect of registration

e) Explain the meaning of incorporation

f) Describe the practical consequences of registration

g) Explain the disadvantages of incorporation

h) Explain the concept lifting the corporate veil

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 9-27

Saleemi.N.A (1997)Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited ,Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 1-17

Oliver.m,Marshal E.A,Company Law pitman publishing London UK Pages 1-26

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK

Pages 361-368

Cheeseman.H,R (1998) Business Law, Prentice Hall International, London U.K

Pages 603-607

Marsh,Soulsby (1998)Business Law Stanley Thorns(Publishers)Limited, Cheltanham UK

Pages 101-102

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law,Reed Elsevier(Uk) Ltd London UK Pages 1-3,10-20

Miller.R,Gaylord.J (1991) Business Law Today, West Educational Publishing

Company,USA. Pages 632-655

Page 32: Bbm4101 Company Law

32

LESSON 2: MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Explain the meaning and importance

b) Explain the purposes of memorandum

c) Explain the contents of memorandum

d) Explain the alteration of the memorandum

e) Describe doctrine of ultra vires

2.1 Meaning and Importance

A company‟s memorandum of association is of supreme importance. The first step in the

formation of a company is to prepare a memorandum of association because no company

can be formed or registered under the Companies Act without it. It is the charter of the

company. “It contains fundamental conditions upon which alone the company is allowed

to be incorporated. They are conditions introduced for the benefit of the creditors and the

outside public as well of the shareholders”. It sets out the constitution of the company and

provides the foundation on which the company is built. It lays down the objects and

scope of activities of the company and also defines the relationship of the company with

the outside world. Its importance can be gauged by the liability of its members and its

scope of activities. “Its purpose is to enable share holders, creditors and those who deal

with the company to know what is its permitted range of enterprise”.

It may be noted here that a memorandum not only defines the powers of the company but

also confines them. Nothing beyond the power as defined by the memorandum shall be

attempted by the company. If this is done, it shall be considered ultra vires. it was rightly

pointed out in Ashbury Railway Carriage Co. v. Riche that, “the memorandum is, as it

were, the area beyond which the action of the company cannot go, inside that area the

shareholders may make such regulations for their own government as they think fit”.

Page 33: Bbm4101 Company Law

33

The following facts indicate importance of the Memorandum: -

a) It provides the basic of incorporation.

b) It determines the areas of operations of the company.

c) It defines the relationship of company with the outsiders.

d) It is an unalterable charter of the company. Although, it can be altered under

some special circumstances.

2.2 Purposes of Memorandum

The purposes of the Memorandum of Association are two – fold. These are: -

a) The prospective shareholders shall know the field in which or the purpose for

which their money is going to be used by the company and what risks they are

undertaking in making investment.

b) The outsiders dealing with the company shall know with certainity as to what the

objects of the company are and as to whether the contractual relation into which

they contemplate to enter with the company is within the objects or the company.

2.3 Preparation of Memorandum of Association

The promoters must prepare the memorandum of association in accordance with the

requirements of the Act which relates to the formation and contents of the memorandum

of association

Section 5 of the Act states that the Memorandum of every company shall be English

language and printed. Section 6 of Acts states that the Memorandum shall be signed by

each subscriber (who shall add his postal address occupation, if any), in the presence of at

least one witness who shall attest signature and shall likewise add his address and

occupation if any. The memorandum shall be divided into paragraphs numbered

consecutively.

2.4 Contents of memorandum

Section 5 of the Companies Act states that the memorandum of association of every

company shall contain the following clauses:-

Page 34: Bbm4101 Company Law

34

Clause 1: The Name

The Memorandum must, together with the other documents, be filed prior to registration

of the company, but before it is filed or even prepared, the promoters must make

enquiries from the Registrar as to whether the proposed name of company is available for

registration and is not considered undesirable. According to Section 19, the promoters

may request the Registrar to reserve name pending registration of a company, and such

reservation remains in for a period of thirty to sixty days. During this period, no other

company will entitled to be registered under hat name.

Section 5(1) (a) of the Act requires a company, if limited, to use the “Limited” as the last

word in its name.

License to drop the word “Limited”:- As per section 21, a company may dispense with

the word “Limited” if it obtains a licence to do so from Attorney General. eg change of

Kenya Power And Lighting Company Limited to Kenya Power .Such a license will be

granted only if the Attorney General satisfied:-

a) That the company to be formed is to promote commerce, art science religion,

charity, or any useful object.

b) That it intends to apply its profits, or other income to promoting objects, and

c) That it prohibits the payment of any dividend to its members.

A company may, under Section 20, change its name by special resolution and with the

approval of the Registrar signified in writing. A special resolution usually requires at

least twenty –one days notice to the members and three-fourths majority of the votes at a

general meeting.

The above section further provides that if, inadvertently or otherwise, the name is too

much like that of an existing company, it can be changed with the sanction of the

Registrar and must be changed, if the Registrar so directs, within six months of its

registration.

A change of name, however, does not affect any rights or obligations of the company, or

any legal proceeding by or against it as per section 20(4).

Page 35: Bbm4101 Company Law

35

Clause II: Registered Office

Every company shall have a registered office from the day on which it begins to carry on

business or within fourteen days after incorporation whichever is the earliest, to which

notices and all other communications can be made (S. 107). The provisions of this section

in effect therefore means that it is possible for promoters to actually register the

company and later on, within the stipulated period of fourteen days acquire and notify the

location of its registered office so that the world will know where it can be found for

communications and location of documents.

Section 108 states that notice of the address of the registered office, and of any change

therein must be given to the Registrar within 4 days after incorporation or of the change.

It is not sufficient simply to record the change of address in the Annual Return.

It is important to remember that the registered office gives the company physical

residence and Nationality as an entity in Law. The registered office of a company is not

necessarily its head-quarters. A company may choose to locate its headquarters at the

registered office, and change therein, if any, must be filed with the register within the

fourteen days from the incorporation of the company change of address. The postal

address of the registered office must also be included in the annual return of the company

as required by section 108 of the Act.

Most of the important documents relating to the affairs of the company are by law

required to be kept at the registered office of the company, for example:-

a) The register of members, and index of members, unless made up elsewhere or

kept by an agent.

b) A copy of every instrument creating any charge requiring registration.

c) The company‟s register of charges affecting property of the company.

d) The minute books of directors and secretaries

e) The register of director‟s interests in shares or debentures.

Page 36: Bbm4101 Company Law

36

Clause III: The Objects Of The Company

This defines the sphere of the company‟s activities, the aims that its formation seeks to

achieve and the kind of activities or business that it proposes to conduct. A company

cannot conduct any business foreign to its objective clause. If anything unauthorized by

the objects clause is undertaken it is considered ultra vires and hence not binding to the

company.

The objects clause of the memorandum gives protection to shareholders who learn from it

the purposes for which their money can be applied. It assures them that their money will

not be risked in any business other than that for which they have been asked to invest.

Similarly, it also protects individuals who deal with the company and who can infer from

it the extent of the company‟s powers. The creditors of the company who are to receive

repayment of their money from the assets of the company feel secure if they know that

the funds of the company will not be utilized for any object not mentioned in the objects

clause.

Choice of company’s objects.

Subscribers to the memorandum may choose any object or objects for the proposed

company. However, they must keep in mind certain points while drafting the objects

clause of the memorandum.

1. The objects should not include anything illegal or against the general law of the

county.

2. They should not include anything in contravention of the Act itself. For example,

a clause in the memorandum providing that the company can buy its own shares

is invalid, as the Act prohibits purchase of its own shares by the company.

3. They should not include anything which is against public policy, for instance,

trading with alien enemies.

The objects clause in the memorandum of every company has to state:

Page 37: Bbm4101 Company Law

37

i. The main objects of the company to be pursued by the company on its

incorporation and objects or ancillary to the attainment of the main

objects; and

ii. Other objects of the company not included in the above clause.

A company which has a main object together with a number of subsidiary objects cannot

continue to peruse the subsidiary objects, after the main object has come to an end.

Crown Bank Re (1890) ch. D 634.

A company‟s objects clause enabled it to act as a bank and further to invest in securities

and land and to underwrite issue of securities. The company abandoned its banking

business and confined itself to financial speculation. It was held that the company was

not entitled to do so.

Incidental acts:

The powers specified in the memorandum must not be construed strictly. The company

may do anything which is fairly incidental to these powers. Anything reasonably

incidental to the attainment of pursuit of any of the express objects of the company will,

unless expressly prohibited, to be within the implied powers of the company. Note the

following cases in this regards:

1. Evans vs. Brunner, Mond Co. (1921) 1 ch. 359

A company, engaged in manufacture of chemicals, proposed to devote a substantial

sum of money to the encouragement of the scientific education. It was proved that

this act would ultimately benefit the company, but a shareholder objected on the

ground that it was beyond the powers of the company. It was held that the proposal

was fairly incidental to the company‟s objects.

2. Forest vs. Manchester etc. Rly Co. (1861) 4 LT 666.

A railway company had the authority to keep boats to be supplied for a ferry. It

employed the boats for excursion trips to the sea when these were not wanted for the

Page 38: Bbm4101 Company Law

38

ferry. It was held that the use of the boats was incidental to the main purpose and was

within the powers of the company.

The court has been generally liberal in implying powers appropriate or incidental to the

carrying of a business as such as:

a) Appointing agents and hiring servants.

b) Borrowing money and giving security for loans,

c) Paying gratuities to employees,

d) Paying pension to former officers and employees, of their dependants “on

the footing that such payment encourages persons to enter into

employment of the company.

Note the following cases in which acts have been held not to incidental to the main

object:

a) London Country Council vs. Attorney General (1902) A.C. 165. The council had

the power to run tramways. It ran omnibuses to feed the tramways. It was held

that this was outside its powers as the omnibus business was in no way incidental

to the business of working tramways.

b) Stephens vs. Mysore Reefs (Kangundy) Mining Co. Ltd (1902) 1 ch. 745. The

Memorandum of a company authorized it to acquire gold mines in Mysore and

elsewhere and contained wide general clauses. The company wanted to work in

Ghana. It was held that it could not do so as elsewhere could not be taken to mean

any other place outside India.

The promoters must exercise care when drafting the object clause since it is not easy to

foresee from the onset all possible business such a company may find advantageous in

the future.

In order to circumvent the obstacles imposed by the „Ultra Vires‟ doctrine, experts have

come up with three types of objects clauses commonly adopted by promoters.

a) The inflated object clause:

Page 39: Bbm4101 Company Law

39

Under this type of clauses, the promoters are free to state any imaginable

business. In one case, North J. said: - “under this type of clause the company is free

to engage in the business of banking and also to engage in the business of establishing

a line of balloons between the earth and the moon”

b) The independent object clause:-

When the experts came up with the first type of clause, the courts which applied

the ultra vires doctrine said that first object was the most important and the rest

were subsidiary. They said that if a company engaged in the other objects other

than the first ones, the subsequent objects must be generically related to the first

and if not then it is ultra vires. The courts regarded first objects as the most

important because it is what the promoters chose first among others. To avoid the

cumbersome and restrictive interpretation of the inflated object clause the experts

came up with the independent objects clause as an alternative. In this case, many

businesses can be listed and at the end of this list, the experts may say: “Each of

the foregoing clause shall in no way, unless otherwise provided, be construed as

forming part of or being dependant upon or shall in no way be construed together

with any other clause herein contained, but that each shall stand as if it severally

formed an object clause of an independent company.

c) The subjective objects clause:

When the experts invented the second alternative, the courts still interpreted this

alternative clause strictly thereby declaring certain businesses of a company ultra

vires despite the fact that such were listed in objects clause. The experts can

simply say that the company is free to engage in any business which in the

opinion of the directors, the company can advantageously engage in. The

promoters can list a number of objects and at the end of it they simply say that the

company can engage in any other business in addition to the ones listed.

Clause IV: Liability Clause

In this clause, the promoters must indicate:

a) Whether the liability of the company is limited or unlimited.

Page 40: Bbm4101 Company Law

40

b) If limited, is it by shares or by guarantee ?. In practice, it is enough to merely say

that the liability is limited.

c) If the company is a public company, the promoters must also indicate in this

clause the liability of directors whether limited or unlimited.

Even if a company has obtained the licence of the Registrar to dispense with the word

“limited” Under section 21 as part of its name, the memorandum must nevertheless state

that the liability of members is limited.

The liability clause is entirely omitted form the memorandum in an unlimited company.

Clause V: Capital Clause

The capital clause of a company states the amount of capital with which it is registered,

divided into shares of a fixed amount. There is no legal limit to the amount of capital or

each share. This capital is called the registered, nominal or authorized capital. The

amount of such capital is determined by the cost of starting the business and there is no

statutory limitation regarding minimum of maximum. It is always prudent for promoters

to consult experts such as accountants to assist them in estimating the amount or

registered capital. A miscalculation of this capital might lead to overcapitalization or

under-capitalization both of which are undesirable to the company.

This clause is to be omitted in the case of companies with unlimited liability and the

companies limited by guarantee having no share capital.

Clause VI: Association or subscription clause

In this clause the subscribers declare that they desire to be formed into a company and

agree to take shares stated against their names. No subscriber will take less than one

share. The memorandum has to be subscribed to by at least seven persons in the case of a

public company and by at least two persons in the case of a private company. After

registration, no subscriber to the memorandum can withdraw his subscription on any

grounds.

Page 41: Bbm4101 Company Law

41

Also the subscribers of the memorandum appoint the first directors of the company. If

they do not appoint any, the subscribers themselves become the directors by the very fact

of incorporation

2.5 Alteration of the memorandum

Section 7 provides that a company cannot alter the conditions set in the memorandum

except in the cases, in the mode and to the extent for which express provision has been

made in the companies act.

The objects of a company can be altered by a special resolution but only to the extent

allowed by section 8 of the Act. Section 8 provides that these alterations of the objects

must be of the following seven kinds.

a) To enable it carry on the business more economically or more efficiently

b) To attain its main purpose by new or more improved means

c) To enlarge or change its local area of operation

d) To carry on some business which may be conveniently combined with its own

e) To restrict or abandon any of its objects

f) To sell or disposes of the whole or any part of its undertaking

g) To amalgamate with another company

The proposed alteration will become effective unless within thirty days of the resolution,

objection is made by petition to the courts in which case the alteration will only apply if

the court affirms it.

2.6 Doctrine of ultra vires

A company that has been incorporated either by a special act of parliament or under

companies act cannot do anything beyond the powers given in the memorandum and

Page 42: Bbm4101 Company Law

42

anything so done is ultra vires. The objects clause governs and limits the powers of the

company to transact its business. Its purpose is two fold;

a) To inform the shareholders in what kind of business their capital may be used and

b) To inform person dealing with the company what its powers are

A company may carry out any business which is reasonably incidental or conducive to

the attained of its stated objects. But a company must not engage in activates which are

not expressly or impliedly unauthorized by the memorandum, otherwise any act which

exceeds the power of the company will be ultra vires and void, and thus cannot be ratified

even by the assent of the whole body of shareholders.

An act is said to be “intra vires” the company if it is within the “company‟s powers” this

will be so if.

a) The act is within the company‟s objects as stated in the memorandum of

association of the company, or

b) The act is reasonably incidental to the company‟s objects which are expressly

stated in the memorandum of association and is done in order to effectuate, or

achieve the stated objects. In this case, the act is intravires the company by

implication even though it is not within the expressly stated objects. The doctrine

was explained by the House of Lords in the case of Attorney General V. G.E.

Rly.

The doctrine of “ultra vires” is best illustrated in Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co.

Ltd V. Riche”

In Ashbury Railway Carriage Co. Vs Riche, the memorandum gave the company power

to make and sell railway carriages. The directors entered into contract to lay a railway in

Belgium, and the company in a general meeting subsequently purported to ratify the act

of the directors by passing a special resolution to that effect. The company later

repudiated the contract and the other party sued for breach. of contact. The House of

Page 43: Bbm4101 Company Law

43

Lords held that there can be no ratification of a contract made by a company „ultra vires‟

even though every single member of the company consented thereto. The contract to

make a railway in a foreign country was of a nature not included in the memorandum and

was therefore void. The company was therefore held not liable for the breach of contract.

Summary for the topic

Meaning and importance

The purposes of memorandum

The contents of memorandum

The alteration of the memorandum

Doctrine of ultra vires

Page 44: Bbm4101 Company Law

44

Revision Questions

a) Explain the meaning and importance

b) Explain the purposes of memorandum

c) Explain the Preparation of memorandum of association

d) Explain the contents of memorandum

e) Explain the alteration of the memorandum

f) Describe doctrine of ultra vires

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 46-

69

Saleemi.N.A (1997)Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited ,Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 57-70

Oliver.M, Marshal E.A,Company Law Pitman Publishing London UK Pages 27-62

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK

Pages374-382

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law, Reed Elsevier(UK) Ltd London UK Pages 3-6

Page 45: Bbm4101 Company Law

45

LESSON 3: ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Explain the meaning of articles

b) Describe the contents of articles of association

c) Explain the alteration of articles of association

d) Describe the constructive notice of memorandum and articles

e) Describe the doctrine of indoor management

f) Explain the rule royal brutish bank v Turquand

g) Explain the exceptions to the doctrine of indoor management

3.1 Meaning Of Articles Of Association

The articles of association are the rules and regulations of a company formed for the

purpose of internal management. The articles regulate the manner in which the

company‟s affairs will be managed. While the memorandum lays down the

objects and purposes for which the company is formed, the article lay down rules

and regulations for the attainment of those objects.

Lord Cairns defined Articles of Association by saying, “The Articles play a part

subsidiary to the memorandum of association. They accept the memorandum as

the charter of incorporation of the company, and so accepting it, the articles

proceed to define the duties, the rights and the powers of the governing body as

between themselves and the company at large, and the mode and form in which

business of the company is to be carried on, and the made and form in which

changes in the internal regulations of the company may from time to time be

made”

Page 46: Bbm4101 Company Law

46

According to section 2 (1), „ Articles‟ means the Articles of association of a company as

originally framed or as altered from time to time in pursuance of the Companies Act. The

Articles are next in importance to the memorandum which contains the incorporated.

They are as such subordinate to and controlled by the Memorandum of Association.

In framing the Articles of a company, care must be taken to see that regulations framed

do not go beyond the power of the company itself as contemplated by the Memorandum

of Association. They should not violate any of the provisions of the Companies Act. If

they do, they would be an ultra vires the Memorandum or the Act, and will be null and

void. For example according to the Companies Act, dividends can only be paid out of

profits. Any provisions into the articles contrary to this provision of the Companies Act

are void. The following case illustrates this point.

In perveril Gold Mines Ltd (1898) 1 ch. 122 the Article of a company provided that no

petition for a winding up could be presented unless

i. Two directors consented in writing.

ii. The petitioner held 1/5 th of the issued shared capital.

None of these conditions were fulfilled. It was held that the restrictions were invalid and

a petition could be presented. However, anything contained in company‟s article which is

identical to any part of table A cannot be questioned since table A is statutory.

The general, functions of articles were clearly stated in Ashbury. Carriage Company vs.

Riche where Lord Cairn said that the Article „‟play a part subsidiary to the memorandum

of association. They accept the memorandum as the charter of incorporation of the

company and so accepting it, the article proceed to define the duties, the rights and the

powers of the governing body as between themselves and the company at large and the

mode and the form in which the business of the company may from time to time be

made‟‟.

Section 9 ties the articles to the memorandum in that they must be registered with

registrar of companies before incorporation. Section 11 states that company limited by

shares may adopt all or any part of the regulations contains in Table A and that where

Page 47: Bbm4101 Company Law

47

articles are not registered or where they are registered and regulations of Table A are not

excluded or modified, those regulations shall be the regulations of the company so far as

they are applicable.

Table A in the first schedule to the Act is provide as a specimen form of article of

association. Part one of which may be adopted in whole or in part by public companies,

and part II of which may be adapted in whole or in part by private companies. Where a

private company does not adopt part 11 of Table A and registers its own they must

include the restrictions required by section 30

Section 12 provides that if special articles are registered they must be.

a) Printed in the English language

b) Divided into paragraphs numbered consecutively

c) Dated ; and

d) Signed by each subscriber of the memorandum in the presence of least one

witness who must attest the signature and add his occupation and postal

address.

3.2 Contents Of Articles Of Association

The Companies Act does not prescribe everything that must be included in the

Articles of Association. The articles are an internal constitution of a company

regulating internal matters of the company hence the promoters and later the members

can indicate any rules they may wish to have so long as such rules are permissible in

law

Though the promoters are free to write anything in their article of association, a well

drafted article should contain the following regulations in the following subjects:

a) Share capital ,rights on lien, variation of these rights, payment of

commissions, share certificates

b) Lien on shares

c) Calls on shares

Page 48: Bbm4101 Company Law

48

d) Transfer of shares

e) Transmission of shares

f) Forfeiture of shares

g) Conversion of shares into stock

h) Share warrants

i) Alteration of capital

j) General meetings and proceeding thereat

k) Voting right of members, voting and poll, proxies

l) Directors their appointment, remuneration qualifications, powers and

proceedings of the board

m) Manager

n) Secretary

o) Dividends and reserves

p) Accounts, audit, and borrowing powers

q) Capitalization of profits and

r) Winding up

3.3 Alteration of articles of association

Companies have been given wide powers to alter their articles. The right to alter the

articles is so important that a company cannot in any manner either by express provision

in the articles or by an independent contract deprive itself of the power to alter its articles.

Any clause in the articles that restricts or prohibits alteration of articles is invalid. The

companies act states that a company can alter or add to, its articles by passing a special

Page 49: Bbm4101 Company Law

49

resolution .Any alteration so made in the articles shall, subject to the provisions of the

Act , be as valid as if originally contained therein

Note:

a) Alteration can only be done by the company i.e. members themselves nobody

else.

b) This must only be effected by special resolution.

Limitations to Alteration

Even though the company may freely alter its articles, it must however, observe the

following limitation.

a) Such alterations must not be inconsistent with the act such as to:

i. Restrict a member‟s right to petition for winding up under section 221; or

ii. authorize a company to purchase its own shares; or

iii. authorize the payment of dividends out of capital.

b) It must not produce conflict between the articles and the memorandum. The

alteration of the articles must not exceed the power given by the memorandum of

conflict with the provisions therein. If it does it will be ultra vires a wholly void

and inoperative. In case of conflict between the articles and the memorandum the

memorandum shall prevail. Reference may, however, be made to the articles to

explain any ambiguity in the memorandum on a certain point.

c) Such alterations must not sanction anything illegal. The alteration must not

purport to sanction anything which is illegal but it is legal and it is not clearly

prohibited by the memorandum it may be held to be valid even where it alters the

whole structures off the company.

Page 50: Bbm4101 Company Law

50

In Andrews Vs Gas Meter Co. Ltd. (1897) 1 ch. 361, the memorandum of a company

provided that the nominal capital of the company was £ 1000sh each. The

memorandum and the articles did not contain any express provisions as to issue of

preference shares. The company by a special resolution altered its articles so as to

give itself power to issue preference shares and then issue them. It was held that

the issue was valid.

d) The alteration must be made bona fide and for the benefit of the company as a

whole. In Allen versus Gold Reefs of West Africa Ltd. (1900) 1 ch. 656, it was

observed that the power of alteration must be exercised subject to those general

principles of law and equity which are applicable to all powers conferred to

majorities and enabling them to blind minorities.

The phrase „the company as a whole‟ means the company as a general body. It

should not discriminate between the majority shareholders and the minority

shareholders so as to give the farmers an advantage of which the latter are

deprived.

3.4 Constructive Notice Of Memorandum And Articles

A company‟s memorandum and articles of association become public documents on

registration with the Registrar or Companies. These documents are available for public

inspection in the Registrar‟s office on payment of such fees as may be prescribed.

Every person who deals with the company is deemed to know the contents of these two

documents. This is known as “Doctrine of Constructive Notice” or “Constructive Notice

of Memorandum and Articles” It is presumed the individuals dealing with the company

have only read these documents but that they have also understood their proper meaning.

The memorandum and the articles are open and accessible to all. It is the duty of every

person to inspect these documents and see that it is within the powers of the company to

enter into the proposed contract. Likewise, special resolutions when registered with the

registrar because public documents so that an outsider is in the notice of their contents in

the same way as he is of the articles and the memorandum.

Page 51: Bbm4101 Company Law

51

Presumption that outsiders have read memorandum and articles. Lord Hartherley

observed in this regard in Mahoney vs. East Holyford Mining Co. (1875) L.R. 7 H. L.

869 as follows:-

“But whether he actually reads them or not is will be presumed that he has read them.

Every joint stock company has its memorandum and article of association open to all who

are minded to have any dealings whatever with the company and those who so deal with

them must be affected with notice of all that is contained in these two documents”.

Thus, anyone dealing with a company is presumed not only to have read the

memorandum and the article but to have understood them, properly (Oak Bank Oil Co. vs

Crum (1882) 8 A. C. 65) The doctrine of constructive notice of the memorandum and

article however, is not a positive doctrine but a negative one. It is like doctrine of

eastoppel. It does not operate against the company. It operates only against an outsider

dealing with the company. It prevents him from alleging that he did not know that the

memorandum and article rendered a particular act ultra vines the company. (Freeman and

Lookeyer vs Buckhurst Park Properties Ltd. (1964) 1 ALL ER 630).

3.5 Doctrine Of Indoor Management

The “doctrine of indoor management” imposes as important limitation on the “doctrine of

constructive notice” Persons dealing with the company are presumed to have read these

documents. Once they are satisfied that the company has powers to enter into proposed

transactions they are required to do no more. They are not to enquire into the regularity of

an internal proceeding. They are entitled to assume that provisions of articles have been

complied with by the company in its internal working. If the proposed contract is within

the scope of the company as indicated by these two documents, the company will be bond

to the outsider and the claims of the outsider will not be affected in any way by the

internal irregularity of the company. This is known as the “Doctrine of Indoor

Management” or rule in Royal British Bank v Turquand.

Page 52: Bbm4101 Company Law

52

3.6 The rule Royal British Bank v Turquand

In the Royal British Bank v Turquand (80) a company was ordered to repay a loan

which its directors had borrowed on its behalf without the authority of an ordinary

resolution prescribed by the articles of association. In the course of delivering his

judgment Jarvis, C. j stated:

„„The dealing with these companies is not like dealings with other partnerships, and the

parties dealing with them are bound to read the statute and the deed of settlement. But

they are not bound to do more. And the party here, on reading the deed of settlement,

would find not a prohibition from borrowing, but a permission to do so on certain

conditions. Finding that the authority might make complete by a solution, he would have

a right to infer the fact of a resolution authorized that which on the face of the document

appeared to the legitimately done‟‟

This statement can be reduced to two propositions which constitute what is compositely

known as „the rule in Turquand‟s case‟.

(a) A person dealing with a company is bound to read the relevant restrictive

provisions of the companies Act, the company‟s memorandum of association and

the company‟s articles of association. If he does not do so, he will deamed to have

read them and, as a consequence, to have been aware of their provision.

(b) In so far as the articles provide that a transaction may be affected by some internal

procedure, the person dealing within the company (called „outsider‟) may assume

that the procedure has been duly complied with.

The combined effect of these propositions is that the company will be bound by the

transaction even if the prescribed procedure was not followed or complied with. An

„internal procedure‟ for this purpose would usually be a decision of the company which is

made by an ordinary resolution passed by the company in general meetings, or a

resolution of the directors passed at a board meeting. Such a resolution is not registerable

at the Companies Registry pursuant to s. 143 or any other section of the Companies Act

and the outsider who goes to the Registry would not be in a position to ascertain whether

it had in fact been passed. Rather than compel him to go to the relevant officer of the

Page 53: Bbm4101 Company Law

53

company to make enquiries, the courts decided to, as it were, „give him the benefit of

the doubt‟ by holding that the resolution will be deemed to have been passed even if it

had not actually been passed.

Examples

The following cases are some of the leading examples of the application of „the rule in

Turquand‟s case:‟

(a) Mahoney v East Holyford Mining Co

The company „secretary‟ sent the company‟s bank what purported to be a final copy of a

resolution of the board authorizing the payment of cheques signed by two of three named

„directors‟ and by the named „secretary‟ .The bank, relying on the „resolution‟ ,honored

claques signed in accordance with its provisions. The company later went into liquidation

and it was then realized that neither the „director‟ nor the „secretary‟ had been properly

appointed and no general or board meetings had ever been held. The liquidator‟s

contention that the cheques which had been signed by the „directors‟ and the „secretary‟

had been wrongly paid and the bank must refund the money was rejected. The bank

neither was nor bound to enquire whether the „directors‟ and the „secretary‟ had been

properly appointed and could rely on the rule in Turquand‟s case. The resolutions

appointing them are not registered under s.

(b) Freeman $ Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties Ltd

The articles of a company formed to purchase and resell an estate empowered the

directors to appoint one of their bodies a managing director. Kapoor, a director, was

never appointed managing director but, to the knowledge of the board, he acted as such.

On behalf of the company he instructed the plaintiffs, a firm of architects and surveyors,

to apply for planning permission with a view to developing the estate. The company later

refused to pay the plaintiffs‟ fees on the ground that Kapoor had no authority to engage

them.

Held, the company was bound by the contract and liable for the plaintiffs‟ fees. The act

of engaging architects was within the apparent authority of a managing director of a

Page 54: Bbm4101 Company Law

54

property company and the plaintiffs were not obliged to enquire whether the person they

were dealing with ( Kapoor) was properly appointed. It was sufficient that under the

articles there was a power to appoint a managing director, and that the board of directors

had allowed one of them (Kapoor) to act as such. In any case, a resolution of the board

appointing managing directors is not registerable under s. 143 and so its passing cannot

be ascertained by a visit to the companies‟ registry

3.7 Exceptions to the doctrine of indoor management

The rule in Turquand‟s case will not apply if:

(a) The person suing the company is in fact an insider, such as a director of the

company. Such a person has access to the company‟s documents from which he

may discover the lack of authority. Exceptionally, he may succeed against the

company if he proves that he was a recently appointed director and had not fully

acquainted himself with the internal procedures of the company.

(b) The company‟s article prescribed a special resolution which had not been passed.

A special resolution is registerable under s. 143 of the Companies Act and if it

had been passed a copy thereof would have been delivered for registration and

would have been found among the company‟s documents at the companies‟

registry. Its absence should have warned the outsider that it had not been passed.

(c) There were special circumstances which should have put the outsider on inquiry:

The transaction is Ultra virus the company. This is so because a company‟s agent

cannot have authority to transact a business which the company itself lacks

capacity to transact.

(d) The transaction relates to the issue of a forged document, such as a forged share

certificate issue by the secretary without the authority of the board, as illustrated

by Ruben v Great Fingall Consolidated Ltd in which Lord Loreburm, L.c.

stated:

„„ it is quite true that persons dealing with limited liability companies are not

bound to inquire into their indoor management, and will not be affected by

irregularities of which they have no notice. But this doctrine, which is well

Page 55: Bbm4101 Company Law

55

established, applies only to irregularies that otherwise might affect a genuine

transaction. It cannot apply to a forgery.‟‟

The company was therefore not stopped by a share certificate to which its seal had

been affixed without the authority of the board of directors after the signatures of

two directors had been forged and added thereto.

Summary for the topic

Meaning of articles of association

The contents of articles of association

Alteration of articles of association

The constructive notice of memorandum and articles

The doctrine of indoor management

The rule royal brutish bank v turquand

The exceptions to the doctrine of indoor management

Page 56: Bbm4101 Company Law

56

Revision Questions

a) Explain the meaning of articles of association

b) Describe the contents of articles of association

c) Explain the alteration of articles of association

d) Describe the constructive notice of memorandum and articles

e) Describe the doctrine of indoor management

f) Explain the rule royal brutish bank v Turquand

g) Explain the exceptions to the doctrine of indoor management

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 69-

73

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 71-86

Oliver.M,Marshal E.A,Company Law Pitman Publishing London UK Pages 63-75

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK

Pages 382-387

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law, Reed Elsevier(UK) Ltd London UK Pages 7-9

Page 57: Bbm4101 Company Law

57

LESSON 4: PROMOTERS

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Define of promoters

b) Describe the functions of promoters.

c) Describe legal status of a promoter

d) Describe fiduciary position of a promoter

e) Describe duty of promoter as regards prospectus

f) Explain remuneration of promoters

g) Describe pre – incorporation or preliminary contracts

h) Explain position of promoters as regards pre – incorporation contracts

i) Explain ratification of a pre-incorporation contract

4.1 Definition of promoters

A promoter is a person who does the necessary preliminary work incidental to the

formation of a company. It is a term used for a person who undertakes, does and goes

through all the necessary incidental preliminaries, keeping in view the object, to bring

into existence an incorporated company.

Chronologically, the first persons who control a company‟s affairs are its promoters. It is

they who conceive the idea of forming the company, with reference to a given object and

then to set it going. It is they, who take the necessary steps to incorporate the company,

provide it with share and loan capital and acquire the business or property which it is to

manage. When these things have been done, they hand over the control of the company to

its directors who are often the promoters themselves, under a different name.

Page 58: Bbm4101 Company Law

58

Lord Blackburn has beautifully stated that “it is a short and convenient way of

designating those who set in motion the machinery by which the Act enables them to

create and incorporate company.

Justice Cockburn defines a promoter as, “one who undertakes to form a company with

reference to a given project and to set it going and who takes the necessary steps to

accomplish that purpose”

So long as the work of formation continues, those who carry on that work retain the

character of promoters. However, if the board of directors is formed and it undertakes the

remaining work of company formation, the promoters‟ function comes to an end.

Not everybody connected with the formation of a company can be called a promoter.

Thus the professional adviser, legal as well as others, are not promoters. Similarly, when

those engaged in starting a new enterprise, consult an expert to advise them of the full

facts with regard to the proposed enterprise and its future prospectus (e.g values,

surveyors, engineers e.t.c) they cannot be called promoters.

S. 45 (5) of the Companies Act [Cap 486] Law of Kenya does not include a person acting

in a professional capacity within the meaning of a promoter e.g a lawyer. Whether a

person is or is not a promoter is a question of fact depending upon the role performed by

him in the formation of the company. A person who does not play a prominent role may

also be a promoter if he has so acted. But if the person is merely employed in

professional or technical capacity such as a lawyer (for preparing the Memorandum and

Articles of Association of the proposed company) accountants, valuers or business

consultant he will not be a promoter.

Section 45(5) (a) provides that a promoter means a person who has a party to the

preparation of the prospectus, but does not include any person acting in a professional

capacity for persons engaged in the formation of the company. But if any such person

acts beyond the scope of his professional duty and helps in any way in the formation of a

company or in preparations for the management of its affairs, he will become a promoter

A registered company may also act as a promoter.

Page 59: Bbm4101 Company Law

59

4.2 Functions of Promoters.

The promoters of a company decide its name and ascertain that it will be accepted by the

Registrar of Companies. They settle the details of the company‟s Memorandum and

Articles the nomination of the directors of the company, bankers, the secretary and the

registered office of the company. They arrange for the printing of the Memorandum and

Articles, the registration of the company, the issue of prospectus; where a public issue is

necessary. They are in fact responsible for bringing the company into existence for the

object which they have in view.

4.3 Legal Status of a Promoter

As to the exact legal status of a promoter, the statutory provisions are silent. His legal

status is incapable of precise statement, but Lindley L. J described his position in Lydney

& Wigpool Iron Ore Co. s. Bird [1866] 33 ch.d as follows.

“Although not an agent for the company, nor a trustee for it before its

formation the old familiar principle of the law of agency and of trusteeship have been

extended and very popularly extended to meet such cases”

Thus it appears that a promoter is neither an agent nor a trustee of the company under

incorporation but certain fiduciary duties have been imposed on him under the

Companies Act. He is not an agent because there is no principal born by that time and he

is not a trustee because there is no “cestui que trust” i.e beneficiary in existence. Hence

he occupies the peculiar position of a quasi trustee.

4.4 Fiduciary position of a promoter

A promoter stands in a fiduciary relation (requiring confidence or trust) to the company

which he promotes. In E – langer Vs New Sombero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 A. C. 1218,

Lord Cairns observed in this regard:

“In equity the promoters of a company stand in a fiduciary relation to it and those

persons whom they induce to become shareholders in it, and cannot in equity bind the

Page 60: Bbm4101 Company Law

60

company by any contract with themselves as promoters without fully disclosing to the

company all material facts which the company ought to know”

The fiduciary position of a promoter may be summed up as follows.

a. Not to make any profit at the expense of the company:

The promoter must not make, either directly or indirectly any profit at the

expense of the company which he is promoting. If any secret profit is made in

notation of this rule, the company may on discovering it compel him to account

for and surrender it, such profit . If he sells to the company, stock or shares of

his own at prices in excess of their market value, he may be liable in damages

for the excess of the price received by him over the market value.

b. To give benefit of negotiation to the company:

The promoter must, when once he has begun to act in the promotion of the

company, give to the company the benefit of any negotiations or contracts into

which he enters in respect of the company. Thus, where he purchases some

property for the company, he cannot rightfully sell that property to the company

at a price higher than he gave for it. If he does so, the company may on

discovering it, rescind the contract and recover the purchase price.

In Erlanger Vs New Sombrero Phosphate Co. (1878) 3 A. C. 1218, a syndicate,

of which E was the head, purchased an island said to contain valuable minerals.

E, as promoter, sold the island to a company newly formed for the purpose of

buying it. A contract was entered into between X, a nominee of the syndicate,

and the company for purchase at double the price actually paid by E. It was held

that as there had been no disclosure by the promoters, of the profit they were

making, the company was entitled to rescind the contract and to recover the

purchase money from E and the other members of the syndicate.

When a promoter sells or wishes to sell his own property to the company, he

should either.

Page 61: Bbm4101 Company Law

61

i. See that there is a Board of independent persons appointed as directors

of the new company or

ii. Disclose his interest in the property to the intended members or to the

public by means of a prospectus. He must also make a full disclosure of

profits he is making in that deal.

c. To make a full disclosure of interest or profit:

If the promoter fails to make a full disclosure of all the relevant facts, including

any profit and his personal interest in a transaction with the company, the

company may sue him for damages for breach of his fiduciary duty and recover

from him any secret profit.

It is important to note that it is not the profit by the promoter which the law

forbids, but the non–disclosure of it and if disclosure is made, the profit is

permissible

The disclosure must be made to an independent Board of Directors. Where there

is no independent Board, disclosure must be made to the intended shareholders

as a whole.

The measure of damages is the actual loss suffered by the company as a result

of the transaction in question.

On 1st February 1873, five persons bought a mine for £ 5,000 for cash with a

view to selling to a company to be formed. On 4th

April, 1878 they entered into

a provision contract with the trustees of the intended company for the sale of the

mine for £ 18,000. Subsequently when the company was registered it adopted

the contract of 4th

April, and four of the vendors were appointed the directors of

the company. On coming to know of contract of 1st February which was not

disclosed to the company, the company sued the vendors to recover that profit

of £13,000. It was held that the vendors were not promoters when they bought

the mine and they were therefore under no fiduciary duty to disclose their

interest and account for the profit they had made.

Page 62: Bbm4101 Company Law

62

Thus, a person who is not the agent nor the trustee of a company, nor in a

fiduciary relationship to the company can, when he buys he buys property sell

the same to the company at a profit without disclosing the same.

d. Not to make unfair use of position:

The promoter must not make an unfair or unreasonable use of his position and

must take care to avoid anything which has the appearance of undue influence

or fraud.

4.5 Duty of promoter as regards prospectus

The promoter must see, in connection with the prospectus if any is issued or a statement

in lieu of prospectus, that the prospectus:

1. Contains the necessary particulars

2. Does not contain any untrue or misleading statements or does not omit any

material facts.

Section 39 of the Act states that a prospectus issued by or on behalf of a company or in

relation to an intended company shall be dated; and that date unless the contrary is

proved, is taken as the date of publication of the prospectus.

Section 40 provides that every prospectus issued by or on behalf of a company or on

behalf of any person who is or has been engaged or is interested in the formation of the

company shall state the matters specified in part one of the third schedule.

It is important to note when a company issues a prospect, this does not constitute an offer

made by the company to members of the public for the company‟s shares. It is a mere

invitation to treat. However, is must be truthful in its content since the promoters can be

held liable for any misstatement in the prospectus. If the promoters fail to do this then

following consequences may ensue:

a) Allotment of shares may be set aside in the case of a fraudulent or innocent

misrepresentation.

b) They may be sued for damages.

c) They may be sued for compensation for misrepresentation.

Page 63: Bbm4101 Company Law

63

d) They may be sued for damages by shareholders who have suffered by reason of

their non – compliance with the statutory requirements as to the contents of the

prospectus, and

e) They may become liable to criminal proceedings.

The Companies Act itself provides for both civil and criminal liability for any untrue

statement contained in the prospectus.

For civil liability, S 45 (1) provides as follows:

S. 45(1) “Subject to the provision of this section, where a prospectus invites persons to

subscribe for shares or debentures of a company, the following persons shall be liable to

pay compensation to all person who subscribe for any shares or debentures on the faith of

the prospectus for the loss or damage they may have sustained by reason of any untrue

statement included therein, that is to say:

a) Every person who is a director of the company at the time of the issue of the

prospectus.

b) Every person who has authorized himself to be named and is named in the

prospectus as a director or as having agreed to become a director either

immediately or after an interval of time.

c) Every person being a promoter of the company and

d) Every person who has authorized issue of a prospectus

However, if the consent of a person is required for the issue of a prospectus which

consent he has given, he shall not by reason of his having given consent be liable

under this subsection as a person who has authorized the issue of the prospectus

except in respect of an untrue statement purporting to be made by him as an expert.

S 45 (2) of the Act provides possible defense to persons who would otherwise be

liable under subsection (1) of section 45.

Such person shall not be liable if he proves:

Page 64: Bbm4101 Company Law

64

a) That, having consented to become a director of the company, he withdrew his

consent before the issue of the prospectus, and that it was issued without his

authority or consent or

b) That the prospectus was issued without his knowledge or consent, and that on

becoming aware of its issue, he forthwith gave reasonable pubic notice that it was

issued without his knowledge or consent or,

c) That, after the issue of the prospectus and before allotment there under he, on

becoming aware of any untrue statement therein withdrew his consent thereto and

gave reasonable public notice of the withdrawal and of the reason thereof or

d) That:

i. As regards every untrue statement not purporting to be made on

the authority of an expert or of a public official document or

statement, he had reasonable ground to believe, and did up to the

time of the allotment of the shares or debentures, as the case may

be, believe, that the statement was true, and

ii. As regards every untrue statement purporting to be a statement by

an expert or contained in what purports to be a copy of or extract

from a report or valuation of an expert, it fairly represented the

statement, or was a correct and fair copy of or extract from the

report or valuation, and he had reasonable ground to believe and

did up to the time of issue of the prospectus believe that the person

making the statement was competent to make it and that person

had given the consent required by section 42 to the issue of the

prospectus and has not withdrawn that consent before delivery of a

copy of the prospectus for registration or to the defendant‟s

knowledge before allotment thereundrer and

iii. As regards every untrue statement purporting to be a statement

made by an official person or contained in what purports to be a

copy of an extract from a public official document or copy of or

extract from the document.

Page 65: Bbm4101 Company Law

65

Untrue statement in the prospectus may also attract criminal liability under S. 46 (1) of

the Act .The said section provides as follows:

“Where a prospectus is issued after the commencement of this Act, includes any untrue

statement, any person who authorized the issue of the prospectus shall be guilty of an

offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or to a fine not

exceeding ten thousand shillings or to both such fine and imprisonment, unless he proves

either that the statement was immaterial or that he had reasonable ground to believe and

did up to the time of the issue of the prospectus, believe that the statement was true”

It is important to note that S. 46 (1) prescribes the criminal sanctions only in respect of

willful untrue statement made in the prospectus and not otherwise.

4.6 Remuneration of promoters

A promoter has no right to get compensation from the company for his services in

promoting the company unless there is a contract to that effect. If there is no such

contract, he is not entitled to get any compensation in respect of any payment made by

him in connection with the formation of the company.

In Clintons Claim (1908) 2ch. 515, a syndicate which promoted a company incurred

certain expenses in respect of fees and stamp duty incidental to the formation of the

company. The company was later wound up. It was held that the syndicate was not

entitled to recover the expenses incurred by it. In practice a promoter takes remuneration

for his services in one of the following ways:

a) He may sell his own property at a profit to the company for cash or fully paid

shares provided he makes a disclosure to this effect.

b) He may be given an option to buy a certain number of shares in the company at

par.

c) He may take a commission on the shares sold.

d) He may be paid a lumpsum by the company

Page 66: Bbm4101 Company Law

66

Article 80 of table A usually gives the directors power to pay all expenses incurred in

promoting and registering the company but this gives the promoter no right to sue for

payment as it only confers discretion upon the directors. However it is common practice

that promoters are usually the first directors and no difficulty is likely to arise for

receiving their expenses.

4.7 Pre – incorporation or preliminary contracts

The promoters of a company usually enter into contracts to acquire some property or

right for the company which is yet to be incorporated. Such contracts are called pre –

incorporation or preliminary contracts. The promoters generally enter into such contracts

as agents for the company about to be formed. The legal position is that two consenting

parties are necessary to a contract whereas the company before incorporation is a non –

entity. In Kelner Vs Baxter (1866) LR 2, Kelner agreed to sell a hotel to Baxter who was

acting agent for a company which was about to be formed. It was held that Baxter was

personally liable on the contract as the company was not in existence at the time of

contracting and therefore, could not ratify the contract after its incorporation. The

promoter cannot, therefore act as agent for a company which has not yet come into

existence. As such the company is not liable for the act of the promoters done before its

incorporation.

A pre-incorporation contract permitted to be made by a company which does not exist is

an annullity. As such the company, when it comes into existence can neither sue nor be

sued on that contract.

In Newborne vs. Sensolid (Great Braitain) Ltd (1954) I Q B 45, New borne a director,

entered into a contract in the name of a company before its incorporation. He signed his

name underneath the name of the yet be formed company. It was not contract.

Page 67: Bbm4101 Company Law

67

4.8 Position of promoters as regards pre – incorporation contracts

1. Company not bound by pre-incorporation contract. A company, when it comes

into existence is not bound by a pre-incorporation contract even where it takes

the benefit of the contract entered into on its behalf.

English Colonial Produce Co. Ltd Re (1906) 2 ch. 435: A solicitor prepared the

Memorandum and Articles of Association of a company and paid the necessary fees and

other incidental expenses to obtain the registration of the company. He did this on the

instructions of certain persons who later become directors of the company. It was held

that the company was not liable to pay the solicitor‟s costs although it had taken the

benefit of his work.

2. The company cannot enforce pre-incorporation contract. A company cannot,

after incorporation enforce the contract made before its incorporation. The

leading case on this point is Natal Land Colonisation Co. Ltd vs. Pauline Colliery

Development Syndicate Ltd AC 120. In this case the N company agreed with an

agent of the P Syndicate. The syndicate was registered and discovered a seam of

coal. The company refused to grant the lease. It was held that there was no

binding contract between the company and the syndicate.

3. Promoter personally liable. The promoters remain personally liable on a contract

made on behalf of a company not yet in existence.Such a contract is deemed to

have been entered into personally by the promoters and they are liable to pay

damages for failure to perform the promises made in the company‟s name even

though the contract expressly provides that only company‟s shall be answerable

for performance.

4.9 Ratification of a Pre-Incorporation Contract

A company cannot ratify a contract entered into by the promoters on its behalf before its

incorporation. Therefore, it cannot by adoption or ratification obtain the benefit of the

contract purported to have been made on its behalf before it came into existence as

ratification by the company when formed is legally impossible. The doctrine of

ratification only applies if an agent contracts for a principal who is in contract at the time

of the contract by the agent.

Page 68: Bbm4101 Company Law

68

Where a contract is made on behalf of a company known to both the parties to be non –

existent, the contract is deemed to have been entered into personally by the promoters.

The company can, if it desires, enter into a new contract, after its incorporation with the

other party. The contract may be on the pre – incorporation contract made by the

promoters. But the adoption of the pre –incorporation contract made by the company will

not create a contract between the company and the other parties even though the adoption

of the contract is made as one of the objects of the company in its Memorandum or

Articles.

In such a case, it is safer for the promoters acting on behalf of the company about to be

formed to provide in the contract that:

1. If the company makes a fresh contract in terms of the pre-incorporation contract,

the liability of the promoters shall come to an end, and

2. If the company does not make a fresh contract within a limited time, either of

other parties may rescind the contract.

Summary for the topic

Meaning of promoters

The functions of promoters.

Legal status of a promoter

Fiduciary position of a promoter

Duty of promoter as regards prospectus

Remuneration of promoters

Pre – incorporation or preliminary contracts

Position of promoters as regards pre – incorporation contracts

Ratification of a pre-incorporation contract

Page 69: Bbm4101 Company Law

69

Revision Questions

a) Define of promoters

b) Describe the functions of promoters.

c) Describe legal status of a promoter

d) Describe fiduciary position of a promoter

e) Describe duty of promoter as regards prospectus

f) Explain remuneration of promoters

g) Describe pre – incorporation or preliminary contracts

h) Explain position of promoters as regards pre – incorporation contracts

i) Explain ratification of a pre-incorporation contract

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 27-

33

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 47-56

Oliver.M,Marshal E.A,Company Law Pitman Publishing London UK Pages 88-94

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK 371-374

Pages

Cheeseman.H,R (1998) Business Law, Prentice Hall International, London U.K

Pages 55-88

Page 70: Bbm4101 Company Law

70

LESSON 5: PROSPECTUS

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Definite a prospectus

b) Explain the purpose of a prospectus

c) Describe the form and contents of a prospectus

d) Explain the report to be set out in prospectus

5.1 Definition of Prospectus

Section 2 of the Companies Act defines a prospectus thus: “A prospectus” means any

prospectus, notice, circular, advertisement or other invitation; offering to the public for

subscription or purchase any shares of debentures of a company.”

In simple words, any document inviting deposits from the public or inviting offers from

the public for subscription of shares of debentures of a company is a prospectus.

5.2 purpose of a prospectus

After obtaining the certificate of incorporation the promoters will take steps to raise the

necessary capital for the company. A public company may invite the general public to

subscribe to the capital of the company and for this purpose a prospectus has to be issued.

The basic objective of issuing a prospectus is to arouse public interest in the proposed

company and induce the general public to buy its shares and debentures. However, it is

not essential for a public company to issue a prospectus. If the promoters are confident of

raising the required capital; privately from their relatives and friends, they need not issue

a prospectus. In such a case, a statement in lieu of prospectus must be filed with the

Registrar of companies.

Page 71: Bbm4101 Company Law

71

A private company, by its articles, prohibits any invitation to the public to subscribe for

any shares in, of debentures of the company. It is also not required to file a statement in

lieu pr prospectus.

The central theme of a prospectus, from money raising point of view, is that it sets out the

prospects of the company and the purpose for which the capital is required. The

prospectus is the basis on which the prospective investors form their opinion and take

decision as to the worth and prospects of the company. A prospectus, from a legal point

of view is not an offer but a mere invitation to treat. When a person makes an application

for shares on the basis of the prospectus, that application is the offer.

Prospectus to be in Writing:

A prospectus must be in writing. An oral invitation to subscribe shares in or debentures

of, a company, or deposit is not a prospectus. Likewise, an advertisement in television or

a film is not treated to be a prospectus.

Subscription:

The word „subscription‟ in the definition of a prospectus means „taking‟ or agreeing to

take‟ shares for cash. It means that the person agreeing to take the shares puts himself

under a liability to pay the nominal amount thereof in cash. In Government Stock and

Other Securities Investment Co. Ltd Christopher, an offer was made by company A to the

members of companies B and C to acquire all their shares in these companies in

exchange of allotment of shares in the company. The offer cannot be held to be an offer

to the public because it does not invite subscription for shares since subscription means

taking shares for cash. Moreover, the offer cannot be said to have been made to the public

as it can be accepted only by members to who it is made. The shares were not open for

subscription by the public.

Invitation to Public:

It may be noted here that a document will be treated as a prospectus only when it invites

offers from the public. Section 57 defines the term “public” as follows: It includes any

section of the public, whether selected as members or debenture holders of the company

Page 72: Bbm4101 Company Law

72

concerned or as clients of the person issuing the prospectus or in any other manner. It

further provides that no offer of invitation shall be treated as made to the public if:

a) The same is not calculated to result in the shares or debentures becoming

available other than those receiving the offer or invitation.

b) It appears to be a domestic concern of the person making and receiving the offer

or invitation.

The public is of course a general word. No particular members are prescribed. Anything

from two to infinity, perhaps even one, may serve to indicate public. The point is that the

offer makes the shares and debentures available for subscription to any one who brings

his money and applies in due form, whether the prospectus was addressed to him on

behalf of the company or not. A private communication does not satisfy the above point.

Where directors make an offer to a few of their friends, relatives or customers by sending

them a copy of the prospectus marked “not for publication,” it is not considered an offer

to the public. In another case, it was held that the offering of share to the kith and kin of a

director is not an invitation of the public.

It was held that the provisions of the Act relating to prospectus are not attracted unless

the prospectus is issued to the public. The term „issued‟ is not satisfied by a single private

communication. The leading case on this point is Nash v. Lynde. In this case the

managing director of a company prepared a document that was marked „strictly private

and confidential” and it did not obtain the particulars required to be disclosed in a

prospectus. A copy of the document along with application forms was sent to a solicitor

who in turn sent it to the plaintiff. The document was held not to be a prospectus and as

such the claim for compensation was dismissed.

On the other hand, the distribution of 3,000 copies of a prospectus among the members of

certain gas companies was held to be an offer to the public because persons other than

those receiving the offer could also accept it. One may note here that an offer or

invitation to any section of the company or as clients of the person making the invitation

will be deemed to be an invitation to the public.

Page 73: Bbm4101 Company Law

73

Similarly, where in an advertisement it was stated, some shares are still available for sale

according to terms of the prospectus of the company which may be obtained on

application, it was held to be a prospectus as it amounted to an invitation to the public to

subscribe to the shares of the company.

Meaning of the word ‘issued’

Issued means issued to the public. It is not necessary that a prospectus should be issued

by a company. It may be issued on behalf of the company by an agent.

5.3 Form and contents of a prospectus

Prospectus is the window through which an investor can look into the soundness of a

company‟s venture. The investor must, therefore, be given a complete picture of the

company‟s intended activities and its position. This is done through prospectus which

must secure the fullest disclosure of all material and essential particulars and lay the same

in full view of all intending purchasers of shares. The contents and preparation of a

prospectus must be in accordance with the provision of the Act, and the following rules

must be observed in all cases:

Section 43 provides that a copy of the prospectus must be delivered to the Registrar of

Companies and must be signed by every person who is named therein as a director or

proposed director.

Section 39 provides that every prospectus issued by or on behalf of a company or

intended company or intended must be dated, and the date, unless the contrary is proved,

is taken to be the date of the publication of the prospectus. Thus it is advisable to insert a

date two or three days later than the actual date on which the prospectus is printed. On or

before the date of publication, a copy must be delivered to the Registrar for registration.

(d) Section 40 (1) provides that every prospectus issued must include the matter specified in part 1 of the

third schedule to the Act and set out the reports specified in part II of the schedule. Sub –

section 2 renders void any attempted condition requiring an applicant for shares or

debentures to waive compliance with the section or purporting to effect him with notice of

any contract, document or matter not specifically referred to in the prospectus.

Page 74: Bbm4101 Company Law

74

As per Third schedule to the Act scheduled, the prospectus must contain the following matters:-

1. The number of the founders or management or deferred shares, if any ,and the nature and extent

of the interest of the holders in the property and profit of the company.

2. The number of shares, if any fixed by the articles as the qualification of a director and any

provision in the article as to the remuneration of the directors.

3. The names, occupation and postal addresses of the directors or proposed directors.

4. Where shares are offered to the public for the subscription particulars as to

(a) The minimum are offered of any property purchased or to be purchased which is to be defrayed

in whole or in part out of the proceed of the issue.

(b) Any preliminary expenses payable by the company and any commission so payable to any

person in consideration of his agreeing to procure subscription for any shares in the

company.

(c) The repayment of any moneys borrowed by the company in respect of the matters aforesaid

otherwise than out of the proceeds of the issue and the source out of which those amounts

are provided.

5. The time of the opening of the subscription lists

6. The amount on application and allotment on each share, and in the case of a second or

subsequent offer of shares, the amount offered for subscription on each previous allotment

made within the two proceeding years, the amount actually allotted and the amount, if any

paid on the shares so allotted.

7. The number, description and amount of any shares in a debentures of the company which any

person has, or is entitled to be given, an option to subscribe for, together with the following

particulars of the option, that is to say:

a. The period during which it is exercisable

b. The prices to be paid for shares or debentures subscribed for under it.

c. The consideration (if any) given or to be give for the right to it.

d. The names and postal addresses of the person to whom it or the right to it was given, or if given

the existing shareholders or debenture holders as such, the relevant shares or debentures.

8. The amount ,if any, paid within the two preceding years, or payable, as commission (but not

including commission to sub under-writers)for subscribing or agreeing to subscribe, or

Page 75: Bbm4101 Company Law

75

procuring or agreeing to procure subscriptions for any share in or debenture of the

company, or the rate of any such commission.

9. The amount or estimated amount or preliminary expenses and the person by whom any those

expenses have been paid or are payable, and the amount or estimated amount of the

expenses of the issue and the person by whom any of those expenses have been paid or are

payable.

10. Any amount or benefit paid or given within the two preceding years or intended to be paid or

given to any promoter, and the consideration for the payment or the giving of the benefit.

11. The dates of parties and general nature of any material contract, not being a contract entered into

the ordinally course of the business carried on by the company or a contract entered into

more than two years before the date of issue of the prospectus.

12. The names and postal address of the auditor, if any, by the company.

13. Fill particulars of the nature and extent of the interest, if any, of every director in the promotion

of or in the property proposed to be acquired by the company, or, where the interest of such

a director consists in being a partner in firm, the nature and extent of such director consists

in being a partner in firm, the nature and extent of the interest of the firm with a statement

of all paid or agreed to be paid to him or to the firm in cash or shares or otherwise

14. If the prospectus invites the public to subscribe for shares in the company and the share capital of

the company is divided into different classes of shares, the right of voting at meeting of the

company conferred by and the rights in respect of capital and dividends attached to several

classes of shares respectively.

15. In case of accompany which have been carrying on business, or of a business which has been

carried on for less than three years, the length of time during which the business of the

company or the business to be acquired ,as the case may be ,has been carried.

5.4 Report To Be Set Out In Prospectus

Part 11 of the third Scheduled makes provisions with regard to the inclusion of report to be set out in

prospectus .Briefly, these are reports by the company‟s auditor starting;

(a) The profit or losses of the company in each of the five financial years preceding the issue of the

prospectus.

Page 76: Bbm4101 Company Law

76

(b) The rate of dividends, if any, paid by the company in respect of each class of shares in each of

those years.

(c) The assets and liability at the last date due to which the amount of the company were made up.

(d) If the proceed, or any part of the proceeds, of the issue of shares or debentures are to be applied

directly or indirectly in the purchase of any business during the five financial years

immediately preceding the issue of the prospectus, and also on the assets and liability of the

business at the last date to which the amount were made up.

Where the company has subsidiaries, the report must also deal either with the combined profit and losses

of each of the subsidiaries. Alternatively, the combined profits or losses of the company

and subsidiaries may be dealt with. Assets and liability of subsidiaries must also be dealt

with.

Summary for the topic

Meaning of prospectus

Purpose of a prospectus

The form and contents of a prospectus

The report to be set out in prospectus

Page 77: Bbm4101 Company Law

77

Revision Questions

a) Definite a prospectus

b) Explain the purpose of a prospectus

c) Describe the form and contents of a prospectus

d) Explain the report to be set out in prospectus

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 79-

92

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 87-110

Oliver.M,Marshal E.A,Company Law Pitman Publishing London UK Pages 95-113

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law, Reed Elsevier(UK) Limited, London UK Pages 58-

88

Page 78: Bbm4101 Company Law

78

LESSON 6: FLOTATIONS

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Define floatation

b) Explain the methods of public issue

6.1 Definition of floatation

A „flotation‟ occurs if a company invites the public to apply for its shares or debentures.

This is only done by public companies since private companies are prohibited by their

articles from doing so. However, a private company which intends to have its capital‟

floated off „to the public must:

(a) Alter its articles in such manner that they no longer:

(i) restrict the right to transfer shares;

(ii) restrict the maximum number of members, and

(iii) prohibit an invitation to the public to subscribe for any shares or debentures of the

company.

(b) Within fourteen days after altering the articles, deliver to the registrar for registration a

prospectus relating to the company which complies with the Third Schedule.

If the flotation is to take place at some future date, the company must, within fourteen days

after the alteration of the articles, deliver to the registrar for registration a statement in lieu

of prospectus which complies with the Second Schedule.

If a private company‟ floated off‟ its shares to the public without altering its articles, the

company would cease to be entitled to privileges and exemptions which the Act confers on

a private company and would henceforth be governed by the provisions of the Act as if it

were not a private company (unless the court, on being satisfied that the failure to comply

with the articles was accidental or due to inadvertence or some other sufficient case, order

otherwise) (s. 31).

Page 79: Bbm4101 Company Law

79

If the company altered the articles but failed to deliver the statement in lieu of

prospectus the company and every officer of the company who is in default shall be liable

to a default fine of one thousand shillings (s. 32(3)

6.2 Methods of public issue

The methods by which public companies raise their capital from the public are explained in

varying detail by English text books on company law. The methods are those which

English companies have evolved over a very long period of time though trial and error.

Although they were not evolved by Kenya companies some of them have been adopted by

those companies. The methods which are explained herein are those which have already

been adopted and those which are likely to be adopted in Kenya as the Kenyan economy

grows largely along the English model as a result of the economic programmes which are

currently being put in place in Kenya. These methods are:

a Prospectus issue

Under a prospectus issue the company sells the shares directly to the public rather than

selling them through intermediaries.

Company sells shares to public

(Issues a document generally

Called „prospectus‟)

As a precaution against the issue being unsuccessful the company may underwrite the

issue (i.e. entering in to contract with a financial institution which agrees to take up the

shares which are not applied for the public). This method is the one which is the generally

used by Kenyan companies

b) Placing

A „placing‟ occurs if the company, instead of selling its shares directly to the public,

arranges with a broker or issuing house to sell them on its behalf.

Page 80: Bbm4101 Company Law

80

Company Broker Sells the shares to Public

(Acts as the

Company‟s agent)

A placing may be a ‘private placing’ if the issuing house purchases the shares and „place‟

them with its clients (usually institutional investors) rather than making them available to

the general public

c) Offer for sale

An „offer for sale‟ is an arrangement whereby a company sells the whole of its shares to an

„Issuing House‟ and the issuing house then re-sells the shares to the general public ,usually

at a profit.

Company sells shares to Issuing House resells the shares to

public (Issues a document

Called „offer for sale‟)

The company usually issues renounceable allotment letters to the issuing house. The

letters enable the allottees to assign their rights to the shares specified in them by signing

forms of the renunciation in favour of third parties who buy the shares. The forms of

renunciation are printed as part of the allotment letters.

d) Offers by tender

An „offer by tender‟ occurs if a company invites tenders for its shares, and sells them to the

highest bidder. This is done with a view to obtaining the best price possible for the shares.

Under this method, the company fixes a minimum price for the share and accepts the

highest tendered price above the minimum price, in much the same way as an auctioneer

who sells goods subject to a reserve price.

e) Rights issue

Page 81: Bbm4101 Company Law

81

A „rights issue‟ occurs if a company which has been trading for some time makes an offer

to the existing members to buy shares of a new issue in proportion to the number of

shares they hold . The existing members, rather than the public, are thereby given a

„right‟ to buy new shares. A member who does not want to keep the shares will have a right

to sell them straight away if he accepts the company‟s offer.

The advantages of this method are that as far as the company is concerned, it obviates

the substantial expenditure that is incidental to an offer to the public and as a far as the

member is concerned, it enables him to buy shares at a price that is usually below their

market price.

f) Bonus issue

A bonus issue is a method by which a company, instead of paying a cash dividend to its

members, retains the cash but issues new shares to the members. The total nominal value of

the shares issued equals the retained cash.

The company thereby increases its nominal capital and acquires the cash it needs for

business expansion without having to borrow money from a bank or other financial

institutions.

This method can only be used if the articles make a provision for it because the general

rule at common law is that dividends are payable in cash:

g) Conversion issue

A conversion issue occurs either during a re-organization of a company‟s capital structure

or when two or more companies amalgamates. What usually happens is that holders of one

type of shares (e.g. preference shares) are offered the right to „convert‟ them into shares of

another type in the same company (e.g. ordinary shares), or, in the case of an

amalgamation, the shares of another company.

This method has business advantages both for the company and the members. It is not,

strictly speaking, a method of raising capital.

Page 82: Bbm4101 Company Law

82

Summary for the topic

Meaning of floatation

The methods of public issue

Revision Questions

a) Define floatation

b) Explain the methods of public issue

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 74-

121

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 177-200

Cheeseman.H,R (1998) Business Law, Prentice Hall International, London U.K

Pages 618-620

Marsh,Soulsby (1998)Business Law Stanley Thorns(Publishers)Limited, Cheltenham UK

Pages 102-106

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law, Reed Elsevier(UK) Limited, London UK Pages462-

466

Page 83: Bbm4101 Company Law

83

LESSON 7: DISTRIBUTION OF COMPANY’S POWERS

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Explain the directors’ powers

b) Explain how the board meetings are conducted

c) Explain the role of the chairman in a company

d) Explain the delegation of directors’ powers

e) Describe the powers, remuneration and removal of the managing director

f) Describe the qualifications ,legal status and liabilities of the company secretary

g) Explain the directors vis members in general meetings

7.1 Introduction

The articles of a registered company usually provide that the „business of the company

shall be managed by the directors.‟ This lesson examines how the directors exercise

their powers and the role played by members in general meeting in the management

process of a company.

7.2 Exercise of Directors’ Powers

The manner in which the directors are to exercise their powers to manage their company

is not governed by the companies Act. The English cases which have a bearing on this

point have been devoted to construction of particular articles rather than formulation of

principles of general application. What is stated hereinafter is therefore the provisions

generally applicable to Kenya companies.

7.3 Board meetings

Table A, Article 80 provides, inter alia, that the business of the company shall be

managed by the directors. The reference to „the directors‟ ,when read in conjunction

with articles 98 and 99 which provide for board meetings and quorum, respectively,

Page 84: Bbm4101 Company Law

84

implies that the power of directors are conferred on them collectively (i.e. as a board )

and not individually . To exercise those powers, therefore, the directors must hold a

board meeting.

7.4 Notice of board meeting

Notice of board meeting must be given to all directors whose whereabouts are known.

However, Table, A, Articles 98 provides that „‟it shall not be necessary to give notice of a

meeting of directors to any director for the time being absent from Kenya.‟‟ It would

appear that no notice need be given if the directors had resolved to meet, and

subsequently met, at fixed times.

Failure to give notice of a board meeting to a director renders the meeting a nullity. The

absence of a provision corresponding to Table A, Articles 51, in relation to board

meetings would be another ground for holding the view that failure to give notice of a

board meeting renders the meeting a nullity, Only such an article would have excluded

the operation of the common rule that failure to give notice of a meeting to a person

entitled to attend the meeting renders it a nullity.

Failure to give proper notice to a director only entitled him to require, within a

reasonable time, that a second meeting be held but did not invalidate the meeting.

Assuming that notice of some sort has been given, the question remains as to whether the

notice was valid one.

There are no provisions in the Act or in Table A and the question must therefore be

considered on the basis of decided cases. In Browne v La Trinidad it was held that five

minutes‟ notice to a director was sufficient since the director did not have other

engagements and the distance did not prevent him from attending. In Re: Homer

District Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd three hours‟ notice was held to be insufficient

since the director had other business to attend to. On the bases of these cases it may be

stated that, to be valid, the notice must be reasonable having regard to the

circumstances of the director given the notice.

Page 85: Bbm4101 Company Law

85

In Barron v Potter the plaintiff and the defendant were the only directors of a

company. The defendant (potter), as chairman of the board with a casting vote, was

anxious that a board meeting should be held. None could however be held since the

plaintiff had refused to attend. The defendant therefore decided to wait for the plaintiff at

a railway station where, as soon as the plaintiff had alighted from a train, told him that he

was convening a board meeting to be held there and then for the purpose of appointing

additional directors to the board. The defendant disregarded the plaintiff‟s protest and, as

they continued to walk along, declared that as chairman of the meeting, he had used his

casting vote and appointed the said directors. It was held that proper notice of the meeting

had not been given to the plaintiff and the meeting at the railway station was null and

void.

In Compagnie de Mayville v Whitley (1896) it was held that it is not legally necessary

to state in the notice of the meeting the nature of the business to be transacted. This

rule acknowledges the fact that the board from time to time considers matters of a

sensitive nature which may be very imprudent to state in advance because of the dangers

of „leakage‟. But it is legally permissible for the notice to state the nature of the business

to be transacted if there is no risk of leakage of confidential matters.

7.5 Quorum at board meeting

The quorum at board meeting is usually fixed by the articles. Table A, Article 99

provides that „‟the quorum necessary for the transaction of the business of the

directors may be fixed by the directors, and unless so fixed shall be two‟‟. Because of the

words „‟the transaction of business‟‟, the quorum must be present throughout the

meeting.

Table A, Article 100 provides that the continuing directors may act

notwithstanding a vacancy in their body. However, if their number is reduced below

the number fixed or pursuant to the articles as the necessary quorum of directors,

the continuing directors or director may act for the purpose of increasing the number of

directors to the number, or of summoning a general meeting of the company.

Page 86: Bbm4101 Company Law

86

7.6 ‘Disinterested’ quorum

The quorum must consist of directors who are entitled to vote. This, generally

speaking, means directors who have no personal interest in the matter to be considered

by the board.

The consequences of a breach of this rule will depend on the provisions of the

articles. Table A, Article 84 (2) provides that a director shall not vote in respect of any

contract or agreement in which he is interested. If he votes, his vote shall not be

counted. He shall also not be counted in the quorum present at the meeting

Since the „disinterested‟ quorum rule does not apply to general meetings it is legally

permissible for a director debarred by the rule from voting at a board meeting to vote on

the same matter if the opportunity to do so arises at a general meeting of the company‟s

members.

Articles 84(1) permits an „interested „director to attend the meeting of the

board but does not require him to withdraw during the discussion of the particular item

of the business in which he is interested. This means that he cannot legally be compelled

to withdraw. It is however advisable for him to so do, particularly if he is the chairman of

the board of directors, since his presence may not be conducive to the frank and free

debate that should take place before a decision is made one way or the other.

7.7 The chairman

Table A, Article 101 provides that „‟the directors may elect a chairman of their meetings

and determine the period for which he is to hold office‟‟.

If no chairman is elected, or if the elected chairman is not present within five minutes

after the time appointed for holding a meeting, the directors present may choose one of

their number to be a chairman of the meeting. These provisions also apply when the

appointment of the chairman of a committee (of the board) is to be made.

7.8 Voting at board meetings

Page 87: Bbm4101 Company Law

87

The voting at board meetings is governed by the articles of the company and, in the

absence of any provision in the articles, the common law rule will apply and each director

will have one vote only. Table A, Article 98 provides that „‟questions arising from any

meeting shall be decided by a majority of votes’’ and, in the case of an equality of votes,

the chairman shall have a second or casting vote.

If the chairman has no casting vote and there is an equality of votes the resolution would

be lost.

7.9 Powers of the chairman

The powers of the chairman of the board of directors is not governed by any statutory

provisions or case law. It is therefore tempting to regard his role as being more of a

„public relations exercise„, such as presenting a good image of the company to potential

customers. He may also facilitate harmonious interaction between individual directors of

the company as well as between directors and the employees His success in this area

depends very much on whether he has a pleasant disposition and good social connections,

usually political.

When he actually presides at a meeting of the board he would be expected to ensure that:

(a) the function of the board is carried out as was agreed at the last meeting;

(b) The meeting is carried out in a business like manner, and

(c) Every director is given a fair opportunity to participate in the discussion.

The chairman of the board usually presides at general meeting of the company as well.

Minutes

For the purposes of the law of meeting , the word „minutes‟ denotes a record of the

business transacted at a meeting of the company which is prepared and kept by the

company, usually pursuant to statutory provision

Section 145(1) provides that every company shall cause minutes of all

proceedings at meeting of its directors to be entered in books kept for that purpose.

Section 145 (2) further provides that any such minute, if purporting to be signed by the

Page 88: Bbm4101 Company Law

88

chairman of the meeting at which the proceedings were held, or by the chairman of the

next succeeding meeting of directors, shall be evidence of the proceedings.

In R v Merchant Tailor Co (1831) it was held that the members have no right to inspect

the minutes of the director‟s meetings.

7.10 Delegation of directors’ powers

In Ellis v Bailey $ Co (East Africa) Ltd (77) Sir Trevor Gould, S g V-p stated that,

„‟without specific authority in the article, directors may not appoint one of their number

to the position of a managing directors or other salaried office‟‟. This is because of the

rule delegatus non potest delegare.

It is however not unusual to find articles of association empowering directors to appoint

a managing director and other officers of the company and to confer on such officers

„such powers as they think may fit‟.

7.11 Managing Director

In the case of companies which have adopted Table A, Article 107 empowers directors to

appoint a managing director „‟for such period and on such terms as they think fit‟‟. In

Craven- Ellis v Cannons Ltd it was explained that the words „the directors‟ at the

beginning of the Article 107 means „the de jure directors‟. Consequently, a purported

appointment by de facto directors would be null and void. A managing director occupies

a crucial position in the management of a company and as such it would be improper to

allow people who are in fact illegally in office (the de facto directors) to appoint him..

7.12 Powers of managing director

Article 109 provides that „‟the directors may entrust to and confer upon a managing

director any of the powers exercisable by them upon such terms and conditions and with

such restriction as they may think fit, and either collaterally with or to the exclusion of

their own powers, and may from time to time revoke, withdraw, alter or vary all or any of

such powers‟‟.

Page 89: Bbm4101 Company Law

89

7.13 Remuneration

Article 108 provides that „‟a managing director shall receive such remuneration (whether

by way of salary, commission or participation in profits, or partly in one way and partly

in another) as the directors may determine‟‟. It was explained in Craven- Ellis v Cannons

Ltd that, unless the article provides otherwise, a managing director would be entitled to

remuneration payable on a quantum meruit basis in respect of services rendered to the

company, in those cases where the directors had not fixed his remuneration at the time of

his appointment. No such payment would however be made if the articles, like Article

108, contain specific provisions pertaining to the payment of remuneration.

7.14 Removal

Article 107 provides that the managing director‟s appointment „‟shall be automatically

determined if he ceases from any cause to be a director‟‟. It was explained in Southern

Foundries Ltd v Ltd v Shirlaw (78) that if the appointment constituted a service

agreement with the company the managing director would be entitled to sue the

company for damages if the removal from directorship derogated from the terms of the

agreement and constituted a breach of it , such as being removed before the period fixed

in the services agreement expired . If on the other hand the appointment does not

constitute a service contract the managing director would have no remedy for premature

removal

7.15 The company secretary

By section 178, every company must have a secretary but a sole director cannot be a

secretary as well. Table A, Article 110, provides that the secretary shall be appointed by

the directors on such terms and conditions as they think fit and may be dismissed by

them.

Section 178A(1) provides that every secretary to the company shall hold a

qualification prescribed by section 20 of the Certified Public Secretaries Act, 1988 which

states that a person is qualified to be registered( as a secretary) if:

Page 90: Bbm4101 Company Law

90

a) he has been awarded by the Kenya Accountants and Secretaries National

Examinations Board a certificate designated the final Certificate of the

Certified Public Secretaries Examination;

b) he hold a qualification approved by the Registration of Certified Public

Secretaries Board , established by Section 11 of the Certified Public

Secretaries Act;

c) he is ,at the commencement of the Act, both a citizen of Kenya and a

member of the professional body known as the Institute of Chartered

Secretaries and Administrator;

d) he is, at the commencement of the Act , both ordinarily resident in Kenya and

a member of the professional body known as the institute of Chartered

Secretaries and Administrators;

e) he is, at the commencement of the Act , registered as an Accountant under

section 24(1) of the Accountant Act; or

f) he is qualified as an advocate of the High Court of Kenya.

However , the Registration Board may, from time to time , by notice in the Gazette,

approve qualifications which is considered sufficient to allow a person to be registered ,

and may, in like manner, withdraw any such approval. A person is disqualified from

being registered-

a) If he is convicted by a court of competent jurisdiction in Kenya or elsewhere

of an offence involving fraud or dishonesty;

b) If he is undischarged bankrupt;

c) If he is unsound mind and has been certified to be so by a medical

practitioner; or

d) During any period when the registration board has determined ,after

consideration of a report of alleged misconduct, that he shall not be registered

or during any such period as varied by the High Court after an appeal against

the determination.

Page 91: Bbm4101 Company Law

91

7.16 Powers and duties of the company secretary

It is surprising to note that neither the Act nor Table A specifies the powers or duties of

the company secretary. Table A, Article 110 merely provides that the secretary shall be

appointed by the directors „‟upon such conditions as they may think fit’’ Table A,

Article 113 however provides that every instrument to which the company‟s seal is

affixed shall be countersigned by the secretary (unless countersigned by a second

directors for the purpose) . Since they are not defined by the Act or Table A, the powers

and duties of the secretary will depend primarily on his job description (i.e. his contract

of employment and its schedule of duties and powers). The „schedule of duties‟ would

normally include the following

a) Issuing notices of general meetings to the members of the company after

being instructed by the board to do so.

b) Taking minutes of the board meetings and general meetings.

c) Issuing notices of board meetings to the members of the board on the

requisition of director.

d) Countersigning documents to which the company seal has been affixed.

e) Keeping the company‟s statutory books and registers.

7.17 Legal status of the secretary

In 1882 Lord Esher in Barnett, Hoare‟s, $ Co South London Tramsways Co stated:

„‟A secretary is a mere servant; his position is that he is to do what he is told, and no

person can assume that statements made by him are necessarily to be accepted as

trustworthy without further inquiry.‟‟

Although this statement was true in 1888 it does not correctly state the current status of

the secretary. For example, in Panorama Developments Ltd v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics

Ltd(108) in 1971 Lord Denning stated:

„‟……times have changed. A company secretary is a much more important person

nowadays than he was in 1887. He is in officer of the company with executive duties

and responsibility …… He is no longer a mere clerk. He regularly makes

Page 92: Bbm4101 Company Law

92

representations on behalf of the company and enters into contracts on its behalf which

some within the day- to-day running of the company business. So much so that he may be

regarded as held out as having authority to do such things on behalf of the company. He

is certainly entitled to sign contracts connected with the administrative side of the

company‟s affairs, such as employing staff , and ordering cars, and so forth.‟‟

This statement correctly defines the position in Kenya as well although we have no

statute dealing with the qualifications and duties of the company secretary.

7.18 Liability of the secretary

As an „officer‟ of the company, the secretary owes fiduciary duties to the company

which is similar to those of a director. He is also liable, in the capacity, under the sections

of the Act which impose criminal liability on „officers‟ of the company who fail to

comply with the requirements of any of those sections.

7.19 Directors vis members in general meetings

To what extent are a company‟s powers distributed between the directors and the

company members assembled in a general meeting of the company?

In the case of companies which have adopted Table A, Article 80 provides.

„‟The business of the company shall be managed by the directors, who may….. Exercise

all such powers of the company as are not , by the Act or by these regulations , required

to exercised by the company in general meeting, subject, nevertheless , to any of these

regulations , to the provisions of the Act and to such regulations , being not inconsistent

with the aforesaid regulations or provisions, as may be prescribed by the company in

general meeting; but no regulation made by the company in general meeting shall

invalidate any prior act of the directors which would have been valid if that regulation

had not been made.‟‟

The exact meaning of this article is uncertain. Prof. Gower has stated, in relation to it ,

that „„under an article in the terms of a Table A the members in general meeting cannot

give directions on how the company‟s affairs are to be managed , nor can they overrule

Page 93: Bbm4101 Company Law

93

any decision come to by the directors in the conduct of its business. And this applies even

as regard matters not specifically delegated to the directors provided they are not

expressly reserved to a general meeting by the Act or the articles.‟‟

Barron v Potter (86), and Foster v Foster (87),in particular , established the rule that, if

the board is unable to function because it is paralysed by personal feuds between the

directors, the powers normally reserved to it by the articles will revert to the company

and become exercised by the members in general meetings so that the company‟s

operations may continue rather than grind to a halt. There is no academic controversy

over this proposition.

Exceptionally, the court may exercise the powers of the board if that becomes necessary,

as in Re: Copal Varnish Co. Ltd where the court approved a transfer of shares. It may

also appoint a receiver of the company‟s business to manage it until a competent board

can be constituted.

Regarding lack of quorum, the articles (e.g., Table A, Article100) usually empower the

continuing directors or director to act for the purpose of increasing the number of

directors to the quorum number or summoning a general meeting of the company to

appoint additional directors.

Summary for the topic

The directors‟ powers

How the board meetings are conducted

The role of the chairman in a company

The delegation of directors‟ powers

Powers, remuneration and removal of the managing director

The qualifications ,legal status and liabilities of the company secretary

The directors vis members in general meetings

Page 94: Bbm4101 Company Law

94

Revision Questions

a) Explain the directors’ powers

b) Explain how the board meetings are conducted

c) Explain the role of the chairman in a company

d) Explain the delegation of directors’ powers

e) Describe the powers, remuneration and removal of the managing director

f) Describe the qualifications ,legal status and liabilities of the company

secretary

g) Explain the directors vis members in general meetings

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya.

Pages 186-196

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 201-234

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK

Pages 425-444

Cheeseman.H,R (1998) Business Law, Prentice Hall International, London U.K

Pages624-626,633-640

Marsh,Soulsby (1998)Business Law Stanley Thorns(Publishers)Limited, Cheltenham UK

Pages122-129

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law, Reed Elsevier(UK) Limited, London UK Pages282-

322

Miller.R,Gaylord.J (1991) Business Law Today, West Educational Publishing

Company,USA. Pages 655-667

Page 95: Bbm4101 Company Law

95

SAMPLE CAT

MOUNT KENYA UNIVERSITY

UNIT NAME: COMPANY LAW

UNIT CODE: BBM 411

TIME: ONE HOUR

Instructions

Choose any three questions

QUESTION ONE

i) Explain the meaning of incorporation 2mks

j) Describe the practical consequences of registration 4mks

k) Explain the disadvantages of incorporation 5mks

l) Explain the concept lifting the corporate veil 3mks

m) Explain the contents of memorandum 6mks

QUESTION TWO

h) Explain the alteration of articles of association 2mks

i) Describe the constructive notice of memorandum and articles 6mks

j) Describe the doctrine of indoor management 6mks

k) Explain the exceptions to the doctrine of indoor management 6mks

Page 96: Bbm4101 Company Law

96

QUESTION THREE

a) Describe the functions of promoters. 2mks

b) Describe duty of promoter as regards prospectus 6mks

c) Describe pre – incorporation or preliminary contracts 6mks

d) Explain ratification of a pre-incorporation contract 6mks

QUESTION FOUR

a) Explain the purpose of a prospectus 2mks

b) Describe the form and contents of a prospectus 6mks

c) Explain the methods of public issue 6mks

d) Explain the role of the chairman in a company 6mks

Page 97: Bbm4101 Company Law

97

LESSON 8: THE LAW OF MEETING

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Explain the meaning of meeting

b) Explain importance of company meetings

c) Explain classification of company meetings

d) Describe the requisites of a valid meeting

8.1 Meaning of meeting

Ordinarily, a meeting may be defined as assembly of people for a lawful purpose or the

coming together of at least two persons for the same reason. A company meeting may be

defined as a concurrence or coming together of at least a quorum of members in order to

transact either the ordinary or special business of the company. Thus on the basis of the

above two definitions, it can be said that a meeting can no more be constituted by one

person than it could if no shareholders at all had attended.

Although the word „ meeting‟ is not defined in the Companies Act; In Sharp vs Dawes

[1876] a meeting was defined as an assembly of people for a lawful purpose of the

coming together of at least two persons for any lawful purpose.

It follows, therefore; that the word „meeting‟ covers a wide range of assemblers, from the

formal meeting of a board of directors of a registered company to the social meeting of

friends. The behavior of people at any kind of meeting is governed by the law of the land

as it affects each individual. For many types of assembly this is quite sufficient and there

is no need for special rules and regulations for such assemblies as theatre and cinema

audiences or friends who go out for a meal together. The law relating to meetings is,

therefore, confined to the regulations of assemblies which consider matters of general

Page 98: Bbm4101 Company Law

98

public concern or the consideration of affairs which are of common concern to members

of the assembly.

These meeting are divided into two types:

a) Public meetings which consider matters of public concern and to which all

members of the public have access, subject to the physical limitations of the place

where the meeting is held or conditions imposed by any law, but irrespective of

whether persons attending the meetings are required to pay; and

b) Private meeting which are attended by people who have a specific right or special

capacity to attend, such as the committee of a golf club or the members of a

registered company. It means the company meeting fall under the category of

private meetings.

8.2 Importance of company meetings

Companies meeting are of considerable importance. Since a company is an artificial

person, it cannot act on its own. It is the directors, the elected representatives of

shareholders, who are vested with the power of control and management of the company.

The directors are to act as a team and for this purpose directors‟ meetings are held

frequently. It is at these meetings that important matters relating to the business of the

company are decided. Similarly shareholder‟s meetings are also important as it is here

that shareholders can look after their interest by exercising the powers conferred on them

by statute. These meetings provide an opportunity to shareholders to come together and

take decisions for their welfare by controlling the board of directors and their activities.

Besides, there are certain matters which can be decided only by the shareholders and the

shareholders‟ meetings are therefore held from time to time.

Page 99: Bbm4101 Company Law

99

8.3 Classification of company meetings

The meetings of a company can be classified as below:

1 .Meetings of shareholders:

a) Statutory meetings

b) Annual general meetings

c) Extra – ordinary general meetings

d) Class meetings

2. Meeting of directors:

a) Meetings of the board of directors; and

b) Meeting of committees of directors.

3. Meetings of debenture holders.

4. Meetings of creditors.

5. Meetings of creditors and contributories on the winding up of the company.

These are explained as under:-

8.3.1 Meetings of shareholders

a) Statutory meeting (sec: 130)

The first meeting of the shareholders of a public company is known as a statutory

meeting. Every company limited by shares and every company limited by guarantee and

having a share capital shall, within a period of not less than one month and not more than

three months from the date on which the company is entitled to commence business, hold

a general meeting of members of the company, which shall be called the statutory

meeting. This meeting is held only once in the life-time of a company. A private limited

company, an unlimited company or a public guarantee company having no share capital

are not to hold statutory meetings.

Page 100: Bbm4101 Company Law

100

The object of this meeting is to afford the shareholders an early opportunity of obtaining

material information as to the circumstances of the companies promotion and also its

immediate prospects. The members have a statutory right to discuss any matters relating

to the formation of the company or arising out of the statutory report, whether previous

notice has been given or not.

Statutory Report

The section accordingly requires that the directors to send a report known as the statutory

report to every member of the company at least fourteen days before the date of the

meeting. However, if all the members entitled to attend and vote at the meeting agree, the

report can be forwarded less than fourteen days before the meeting.

The report must be certified by the least two directors of the company. The auditors also

must certify as correct certain particulars of the report in accordance with section 130 (4)

which states:

“The statutory report shall, so far as it relates to the shares allotted by the company, and

to the cash received in respect of such shares, and to the receipts and payments of the

company on capital account, be certified as correct by the auditors, if any, of the

company”

A copy of the report must be delivered to the Registrar of Companies forthwith after it

has been sent to the members i.e section 130 (5).

Contents of Statutory Report

The statutory report of a company contains all the necessary information relating to the

formational aspect of the company. It sets out the following information:

a) Total shares allotted – the total number of shares allotted, distinguishing shares

allotted as fully or partly paid- up otherwise than in cash and stating in the case of

shares partly paid -up, the extent to which they are so paid - up, and in either case,

the consideration for which they have been allotted.

Page 101: Bbm4101 Company Law

101

b) Cash received – the total amount of cash received by the company in respect of all

shares allotted

c) An abstract of the receipts of the company and of payments made up to a date

within the seven days of the date of the report. This abstract must distinguish the

source of the receipts and must also show an estimate of the preliminary expenses

of the company.

d) Directors and auditors – the names, addresses and occupations of the directors,

auditors and managers and secretary, and changes which have occurred in such

names, addresses and occupations since the date of the incorporation of the

company.

e) The particulars of any contract the modification of which is to be submitted to the

meeting for its approval, together with the particulars of the modification or

proposed modification.

At the meting a list of the names, addresses and descriptions of the members, and

the number of shares held by them respectively is required to be produced and to

remain open for inspection during the meeting. At the meeting the whole situation

with regard to the company is received in the light of the report. Section 130 (7)

provides that the members present at the meeting are free to discuss any matters

relating to the formation of the company, or arising out of the report whether

previous notice has given or not, but no resolution of which notice has not been

given in accordance with the articles may be passed.

Section 130(8) provides that the meeting may adjourn from time to time and at

any adjourned meeting a resolution can be passed after due notice in accordance

with the articles has been given so that if the company at the original meeting

wishes to pass a resolution and sufficient notice has not been given, it can resolve

to adjourn for the necessary period in order to allow notice to be given

Page 102: Bbm4101 Company Law

102

Default of holding the statutory meeting

If default is made in complying wit the provisions of section 130, every director of the

company who is knowingly and willfully guilty of the default, or in the case of default by

the company every officer f the company who is in fault is liable to a fine up to one

thousand shilling .In addition to the default fine, default in delivering the statutory report

or in holding the statutory meeting is one of the grounds for petition for a winding up

order against the company. The court ordinarily does not take such a serious view of the

default. So, instead of making a winding up order, section 222(3) provides that the courts

may direct the report to be delivered or the meeting to be held and order the costs to be

paid by the persons in default.

Objects of statutory meeting and statutory report are follows:

1. To put the members of the company in possession of all the important facts

relating to the company, what shares have been taken up, what money received,

what contracts entered into, and what sums spent on preliminary expenses etc.

2. To provide the members an opportunity of meeting and discussing the

management, methods and prospectus of the company. To approve the

modification of the terms of any contract named in the prospectus

b) Annual general meetings (sec. 131)

Every company shall in each year hold, in addition to any other meeting a general

meeting as its annual general meeting and shall specify the meetings as such in the notice

calling it. There shall not be an interval of more than 15 months between one annual

general meeting of the company and the next. A company may hold its first annual

general meting within a period of 18 months from the date of its incorporation. In that

event it is not necessary for the company to hold any annual general meeting in the year

of its incorporation or in the next year. Year means calendar year.

Example: A company incorporated on October 1, 1994 may hold its first annual general

meeting by April 1; 1996 and then no other meeting will be necessary either for 1995 or

1996. Similarly, a company incorporated on January 1, 1995 may hold its first annual

general meeting within 18 months, i.e upto July, 1996. If the meeting is held, say in June

Page 103: Bbm4101 Company Law

103

1996, the company need not hold any other meeting in the year 1995 to 1996. This

enables such a company to draw up its first set of accounts to be presented to the

shareholders at the meeting.

The Registrar may, for any special reason, may extend the time for holding any annual

general meeting by a given period. But no extension of time is granted for holding the

first annual general meeting.

There should be at least one annual general meeting per year and as many meetings as

there are years. This point was very well brought in the following case.

Sree Meenakshi Mills co. Ltd vs. Assistant Registrar of Company A.I.R [1938] Mad 640.

The annual general meeting of a company called in December 1934 was adjourned and

held in March 1935. The next meeting was held in January 1936, no other meeting being

held in 1935. The company was prosecuted for failure to call the annual general meeting

in 1935. The company argued that it did hold a meeting in the year 1935, but it was held

by the court that the meeting of March 1935 was the adjourned meeting of 1934.

If default is made in holding annual general meeting a member may apply to the

Registrar of Companies to call or direct the calling of such meeting. On such application

the Registrar has power to call the meeting and to give such directions as appears to him

expedient.

If such a meeting is not held in the year in which the default in holding the company‟s

annual general meeting occurred, it is held unless the company resolves at that meeting

that it must be so treated. If such a resolution is passed a copy of it must be sent to the

Registrar of Companies within fourteen days.

Default in accordance with the prevision of section 131, or in complying with any

directions of the Registrar, renders the company and its officers who are in default liable

to a fine up to two thousand shillings.

Page 104: Bbm4101 Company Law

104

Requirements of Notice

Proper length of notice must be given as provided by statute. Section 133 of the Act

provides that the minimum notice required for company meetings (other than an

adjourned meetings) ia as follows:-

a) In the case of an annual general meeting, twenty-one days notice in writing; and

b) In the case of a meeting other than an annual general meeting, or a meeting for the

passing of a special resolution, fourteen days notice in writing, and seven days

notice in the case of an unlimited company.

Any provision contained in a company‟s articles shall be void in so far as it provides for

the calling of a meeting by a shorter notice than is provided by this section. There is,

however, nothing to prevent a company‟s articles providing for longer notice than that

laid down by the Act, in which case the company must comply with its articles.

Ordinary Business Annual General Meeting:

The normal business transacted at an annual general meeting depends upon the articles.

Articles 52 of table A provides that the ordinary business of such a meeting shall be:

a) the declaration of dividend;

b) the consideration of accounts;

c) the election of directors in place of those retiring; and

d) the appointment of, and the fixing of the remuneration of auditors,

Any business which is not defined as ordinary business of an annual general meeting is

known as special business.

Section 148 provides that at the annual general meeting the directors of a company must

lay before the company a profit and loss account. This account will be in the case of the

first account from the incorporation of the company, and in any other case, from the

preceding year.

Page 105: Bbm4101 Company Law

105

The proceedings at the meeting are commenced by the chairman, who usually makes a

speech on the company‟s affairs and any other circumstances of interest to the company

and also answers questions if any, from the members. After his speech he proposes the

motion relating to the adoption of the account and payment of dividends if any .

The next item of business deals with proposals for election or re-election of directors. In

this connection, the requirement, of section 184 must be complied with. This section

stipulates that if a single resolution is passed for election or re-election of more that one

director of a public company, such a resolution is invalid unless resolution was

previously passed that all the directors concerned can be elected by a single composite

resolution.

After dealing with the election and re-election of directors, a motion regarding the

remuneration of a company‟s auditors is proposed. The resolution for this is obligatory.

Although the appointment of auditors must be made by the company in the general

meeting, they are automatically re-elected, provided they are qualified, without any

resolution to that effect, unless.

a) they have resigned; or

b) they are unwilling to act; or

c) a resolution has been passed expressly providing that they shall not be

reappointed; or

d) other auditors in their place have been appointed

Importance of annual general meeting:

It is only at the annual general meeting of a company that the shareholders can exercise

any control over the affairs of the company. They can confront the directors, their elected

representatives, at least a year. They also get an opportunity to discuss the affairs and

review the working of the company.

They can also take the necessary steps for the protection of their interests. They may, for

example, refuse to re-elect a director whose actions and policy they disapprove . They

Page 106: Bbm4101 Company Law

106

can also take up any other business relating to the affairs of the general meeting. Annual

accounts are presented for the consideration of the shareholders and dividends are

declared in the annual general meeting.

c) Extraordinary general meeting (sec:312)

A statutory meeting and an annual general meeting of a company are called ordinary

meetings. Any meeting other than these meetings is called extraordinary general meeting.

It is called for transacting some urgent or special business which may not be postponed

untill the next annual general meeting.

Such a meeting may be held subject to the terms of articles of association at any time the

directors think it is necessary to transact business of a special character.

Article 48 and 49 of table A make previsions for the convention of general meetings

other that annual general meeting.

Article 48: All other meeting other than general meetings shall be called extraordinarily

general meetings.

Article 49: The directors may, whenever they think fit, convene an extraordinary general

meeting, and it may also be convened by the requisitionists as provided by section 132 of

the Act.

Article 52 of Table A states that all business that is transacted at an extraordinary meeting

shall be deemed as special.

The extraordinary general meeting may be convened:

a) by the Board of directors on its own or on the requisition of the members; or

b) by the requsitionists themselves on the failure of the Board of Directors to call the

meeting.

Page 107: Bbm4101 Company Law

107

Convening of extraordinary meeting

a) On its own, The Board of Directors may call an extraordinary general meeting

whenever some special business is to be transacted which in the opinion of the

Board of Directors cannot be postponed till the next annual general meeting.

b) On requisition of the members. The requisite number of members of a company

may also ask for an extraordinary general meeting to be held in such a case the

Board of Directors shall proceed duly to call such a meeting of the company. The

requisition for such a meeting by the members shall be signed.

In the case of a company having a share capital, holders of not less than one-tenth of

the paid-up capital of the company, having the right of voting in regard to the

matter of requisition; or

In the case of a company not having a share capital, by members representing not less

than one-tenth of the total voting power in regard to the matter or requisition.

A requisition signed by one of the joint owners of the shares has the same force and

effect as if it had been signed by all of them.

The requisition shall set out the matters for the consideration of which the meeting is to

be called. It shall be deposited at the registered office of the company.

The directors are required by section 132 to convene such a meeting within twenty - one

days from the date of the deposit of the requisition, but if they fail to do so, requisitionists

themselves may convene the meetings, as nearly as possible in the manner required by

the company‟s articles for the convening of meetings.

The company must compensate the requisitions for any reasonable expenses incurred and

may repay itself out of sums payable by the company to such directors as were in fault.

Notice

Page 108: Bbm4101 Company Law

108

Unless the meeting is called to pass a special resolution, the requisite notice for an

extraordinary general meeting is fourteen clear days (i.e. Saturday, Sunday of other

public holidays are not included in computing the period) in the case of all companies

other than unlimited company when seven days, notice is required. Where a special

resolution is to be passed, the notice required is twenty – one days.

d) Class meeting

Meeting of classes of shareholders are necessary if the share capital of the company is

divided into different classes of shares. These meeting are usually required when it is

proposed to alter, vary or affect the rights of a particular class of shares. In such case, the

articles of association usually provide for the holding of meetings of the particular class

of shareholders and for the consent of that class to be given by a stated majority of the

members of that class. Where upon the variation is deemed to be binding on all the

members of the class.

Prime facie, a class meeting should be attended by the members of the class in order that

the discussion of the matter which the meeting has to consider may be carried on

unhampered. The presence of a number of persons with conflicting interests would render

it impossible for members of the class to adequately discuss the matter form their point of

view. And if the presence of the outsiders is retained in spite of the ascertained wish of

the constituents of the meeting for their exclusion, it cannot be said that a separate

meeting of the class had been fully held. But where the constitutions of the meting meet

together and no one infact raises any objection to the presence of strangers or outsiders

within the same four walls, there is no reason why their meeting should not be a perfectly

good meeting

Articles 4 of Table A provides that the rights of a particular class of shares may (whether

or not the company is being wound up), be varied with the consent in writing of the

holders of three fourths of the issued shares of that class, or with the sanction of a special

resolution passed at a separate general meeting of the holders of the shares of the class.

Page 109: Bbm4101 Company Law

109

Rights of Minority

Although the articles usually allow the variation of class rights with the consent of a

specified proportion of a class of shareholders, the minority of that particular class of

shares has a valuable right to object.

Section 74 stipulates that the holders of not less than 15% of the issued shares of that

class being persons who did not consent to the resolution or abstained of did not vote at

all may object within thirty days to the alteration approved by the majority of the class.

The court must disallow the variation if it is satisfied that it would unfairly prejudice the

shareholders of the class, but if not satisfied, then it will confirm the variation. A copy of

the order of the court made on such application must be forwarded within thirty days to

the Registrar. If the memorandum or articles of the company do not provide for the

variation of class rights and it is desired that a variation be effected, then this must be

done under section 207 which gives power to a company to compromise with its

creditors, or any class or them, or its members or any class of them.

8.3.2) Meeting of the board of directors

Wide powers have been vested in the board in regard to management of companies. The

company is entitled to the combined wisdom of the directors and the directors are

required to meet together as a board. Under the circumstances, directors must hold their

meetings as frequently as possible. These meetings of the directors are known as Board

meetings.

The Board meetings are the most important as well as the frequently held meetings of the

company. It is at these meetings that all important matters relating to the company and its

policy are discussed and decided upon.

Meeting of committees of directors

In case of large companies, the board of directors usually find it convenient, and often

necessary, to delegate certain matters to a committee of their number, but may only

delegate their powers in this manner if the articles of association so provide. By doing so,

Page 110: Bbm4101 Company Law

110

the full board will probably not need to meet more frequently. The committee so formed

shall, in the exercise of the powers so delegated, conform to any regulation that may be

imposed on it by the board.

The committees may be either standing or ad hoc committees. Standing committees such

as share transfer or finance committees are usually formed to conduct routine business. A

committee formed to consider the inauguration of a pension scheme for the company‟s

employees is an example of ad hoc committee.

8.3.3) Meeting of debentures holders

These meetings are held in accordance with the rules and regulations that are either

entered in the trust deed or endorsed on the debenture bond so that they are binding upon

both, the holders or debentures and the company. These meetings are called from time to

time where the interests of debenture holders are involved at time of the reconstruction,

reorganization, amalgamation or winding-up of the company. The rules and regulations

entered in the trust deed relate to notice of the meeting, appointment of a chairman or the

meeting passing the resolution, quorum of the meeting and the writing and signing of

minutes.

8.3.4) Meeting of creditors

These meetings are called when the company proposes to make scheme or arrangement

with its creditors. Companies, like individuals, may sometimes find it necessary to

compromise or make some arrangement with their creditors. Section 207 to 209 of the

Companies Act not only give powers to the company to compromise with the creditors

but also lay down the procedure for doing so.

8.3.5) Meeting of creditors and contribution on winding up

The meetings are held when the company has gone into liquidation. These meetings are

held to ascertain the total amount due by the company to its creditors and also to appoint

either liquidators to wind up the affairs of the company or a committee of inspection.

They term contributory‟ covers every person who is liable to contribute to the assets of a

company in the event of this being wound up.

Page 111: Bbm4101 Company Law

111

8.4) Requisites of a valid meeting

A meeting can validly transact any business if the following requirements are satisfied:-

a) The meeting must be duly commenced by a proper authority.

b) a proper notice must be served in the prescribed manner

c) a quorum must be present;

d) a chairman must preside;

e) minutes of the proceedings must be kept

a) Proper Authority

The proper authority to convene a general meeting (whether statutory, annual general or

extraordinary) of a company is the Board of Directors. The Board of directors should

pass a resolution to call meeting at a duly convened meeting of the Board. If the directors

do not call the meeting the members of the company may call the meeting.

If some defect in the appointment or qualifications of the directors present at the Board

meeting comes to light after the Board has acted bona fide, such a defect is not

necessarily fatal to the validity of their resolution to call the meeting. Even if the meeting

of the Board at which it is resolved to call a general meeting is not properly concerned or

constituted, the general meeting called by the Board can act

b)Notice of General Meeting

A proper notice of the meeting should be given to the members and all others who are

entitled to attend the meeting. The length of notice required by section 133 for calling a

general meeting is twenty – one days for the annual general meeting. Section 133, since

statutory, overrides any provision in the articles for a shorter notice. But the articles can

validly provide for longer notice than that laid down by statute, in which case the

company must comply with its articles.

Notwithstanding the argument above, there are exceptions to the requirements as to

notice i.e

Page 112: Bbm4101 Company Law

112

i. An annual general meeting may, however, be called by a shorter notice and is

to be deemed duly convened, if it is consented to by all the members entitled

to vote at the meeting, and

ii. Any other meeting if the holder of 95 percent of the nominal value of shares

or of the total power consent to the shorter notice i.e. section 133 (3).

iii. If the members agree to accept a shorter notice, a resolution to that effect must

be recorded in the minutes of the meeting with sufficient details of voting

Bailey, Hay Co. Re [1971] 1 W.E.R 1357. The notice of a meeting for the voluntary

winding up of a company was short by one day. All the five members of the company

attended the meeting. The necessary resolution was passed by the votes of two members.

The other three members abstained from voting. It was held that the resolution was

validly passed with the unanimous assent of all the members and those who abstained

were treated as having acquiesced in the winding up.

Persons on whom notice is to be served and contents of notice.

The notice of every meeting of a company shall be given to:-

1. every member of the company entitled to vote;

2. the persons on whom the shares of any deceased or insolvent member may have

devolved, and

3. the auditor(s) of the company.

If notice of a meeting is not given to every person entitled to receive notice, any

resolution passed at the meeting will be of no effect.

Young vs. Ladies Imperial Club, [1920] 2 K.B. 523. A Committee of a club met and

passed a resolution expelling Y from the club. The notice convening the meeting sated

that it was summoned, “to report and discuss of the matter concerning Y” .X, a member

of the committee was not summoned to the meeting, as she had previously informed the

chairman that she would be unable to attend the meeting. It was held that the omission to

give notice to all those entitled to notice invalidated the proceedings of the committee and

Page 113: Bbm4101 Company Law

113

in any event the notice did not give sufficient indication of the purpose (i.e. expulsion of

Y) of the meeting.

Omission to give notice:

Deliberate omission to give notice even to a single member may invalidate the meeting

(Smyth vs Darley; [1849] 2 H.L. 789) An accidental omission to give notice to, or the

non-receipt of notice by, any member or the person to whom it should be given, does not

invalidate the proceedings at the meeting. Accidental omission means that it is not

deliberate.

Contents of Notice

Every notice of a company calling a meeting shall specify the place and the day and hour

of the meeting. It shall also contain a statement of the business to be transacted at the

meeting.

The notice of a general meeting must fairly and intelligently convey the purpose for

which the meeting is called to enable a person having the right to attend reasonably to

make up his mind to attend or not. It should not be misleading or Baillie vs Oriental

Telephone & Electronic Co. [1915], ch 503. Between 1907 and 1914 the directors of a

subsidiary company had been receiving remuneration as directors of a subsidiary

company without the shareholders of the holding company knowing this. A special

resolution was passed at an extraordinary meeting authorizing the directors to keep

money. The notice did not specify that the sum involved was nearly £ 45,000. Held the

notice was bad because it did not give sufficient details.

Kaye V Croydon Tramways Co. [1898] 1 ch 358. A notice convening a meeting stated

that the object of the meeting was to adopt an agreement for the sale of the company‟s

undertaking to another company. The notice did not disclose that the directors were

interested in the agreement as a substantial part of the sale proceeds was to be paid to the

directors as compensation for loss of office. It was held that the notice was bad as it did

not fairly disclose the purpose for which the meeting was called.

Page 114: Bbm4101 Company Law

114

Special Notice

Certain powers which are exercisable by members by ordinary or special resolution may

require “special notice” to the company. Section 142 provides that where, by any

provision in the Act a special notice is required of a resolution, the resolution shall not be

effective unless the notice of the intention to move it has been given to the company (not

by the company) not less than twenty – eight days before the meeting at which it is

moved. The company must then give its members notice of the resolution at the same

time and in the same manner as it gives notice of the meeting.

If that is not practicable, it shall give them notice of the resolution either by

advertisement in a newspaper having an appropriate circulation or in any other mode

allowed by the articles, not less than twenty one days before the meeting.

A special notice is required for the following resolutions.

i. removing a director

ii. authorizing the appointment of a director over seven years

iii. appointing as an auditor at an annual general meeting a person other than a

retiring auditor or

iv. providing expressly that a retiring auditor shall not be appointed

c) Quorum of general meeting

Quorum means the minimum number of members who must be present in order to

constitute a valid meeting. The quorum is generally fixed by the articles.

Article 53 of Table A provides that no business shall be translated at any general meeting

unless a quorum is presented at the time when the meeting proceeds to business, save as

herein otherwise provided, three members present in person shall be quorum. Thus, those

members who intended to vote by proxy are not taken into account when determining

whether or not a quorum is present. Where no provision is made as to quorum in the

articles, Section 134 ( c ) prescribes two members, in the case of a private company, and

in other cases three members, personally present as the quorum for a general meeting of

Page 115: Bbm4101 Company Law

115

the company. If, however, articles provide for a quorum present in person or proxy,

proxies can be counted.

As a general rule if no quorum is present, then there is no meeting, and any business of

conducted is invalid. Thus, unless the article otherwise provide, if within half an hour

from the time appointed for holding a meeting of the company, a quorum is not present,

the meeting;

i. if called upon the requisition of members stand be dissolved

ii. but in other cases it shall stand adjourned to the same day in the next week

at the same time and place as the directors may determine.

Note:

If the quorum is not similarly present at the adjourned meeting, then the members present

shall be quorum.

When should quorum be present?

The quorum should be present at the time when the meeting proceeds to business. It need

not be present throughout or at the time of taking vote on any resolution.

Illustration

Hartley Baird Ltd, Re [1955] ch 143.

A meeting was summoned for the purpose of altering the class rights of certain

shareholders. A quorum was present when the meeting began but it fell below the

required number when a member, who opposed the resolution left meeting before the

vote was taken. It was held that the alteration was valid.

One person, except in the exceptional cases cannot constitute a quorum. The word

„meeting‟ prime facie means a coming together of more than one person. Strictly

speaking therefore, one shareholder cannot constitute a meeting. This is known as Rule in

Sharp vs Dawes.

Page 116: Bbm4101 Company Law

116

Sharp vs Dawes [1876] 2 Q.B.D. 26.

A general meeting of a company was called for the purpose of making a call. Only one

shareholder attended the meeting. The business of the company was carried through

including a call on the shareholders Dawes was sued for the call he had failed to pay. In

his defense, Dawes argued that the call had not been validly made at a general meeting. It

was held that one person could constitute a meeting. Mellish said:

“it is clear that, according to the ordinary use of the English language, a meeting could

not more be constituted by one person than a meeting could have been constituted if no

shareholder at all had attended. No business could be done at such a meeting”

Re Sanitary Carbon Co. [1877] appeared to lend support to the above decision, as it was

held that a meeting of a company attended by one shareholder only was not validly

constituted – even though that shareholders held the proxies of all the other members.

Therefore, as a general rule one individual alone does not constitute a meeting even if she

or he represents two or more members, for example by being both a member and a proxy

for another member or by being a member both in his or her own right and as a trustee for

another

In Re London Flats [1969] the articles of a company required a quorum of two. It was

held that a decision made by one shareholder after the other had left the room was a

nullity. Plowman J. described the powers of the court to order a company meeting of one

as exceptional and held that they did not displace the general rule that „a single

shareholder cannot constitute a meeting‟

Modern technology and meetings:

With the development of modern technology, the possibilities for holding meetings and

conferences simultaneously in different venues connected by audiovisual or similar

linked has become possible. Teleconferencing, for example, is a modern day reality

where groups of delegates gathered in different parts of the world can take part in the

same conference proceedings aided by satellite communications and audio-visual links.

The question then arises whether as a matter of law such events can amount to a meeting

Page 117: Bbm4101 Company Law

117

given that a meeting is the coming together of at least two persons for any lawful purpose

and that meeting means to come face to face with or into the company of another person.

The issue arose in Byng vs Lodasn Life Assurance Ltd [1989] where too large a number

of shareholders for the venue turned up at an extraordinary general meeting and had to be

accommodated in overflow rooms connected to the main venue by audio – visual links.

One of the issues in the case was whether there was a meeting. The following extract

form the judgment of Browne – Wilkonson V-C in the court of Appeal appears to reflect

that attitude of the courts;

“The rationale behind the requirements for meeting in the Companies Act is that the

members shall be able to attend in person so as to debate and vote on matters affecting

the company. Until recently this could only be achieved by everyone being physically

present in the same room face to face. Given modern technologies advances, the same

result can now be achieved without all the members coming face to face. Without being

physical in the same room they can be electronically in each other‟s presence so as to

hear and be heard and to see and be seen. The fact that such a meeting could not have

been foreseen at the time the first statutory requirement for meetings were laid down,

does not require us to hold that such a meeting is not within the meaning of the word

„meeting in the Companies Act.

Thus, communication by telephone had been held to be a „telegraph‟ within the meaning

of the Telegraph Acts 1863 and 1869, not withstanding that the telephone had not been

invented or contemplated when those Acts were passed. Attorney General vs. Edison

Telephone Co. pf London Ltd [1880].

I have no doubt therefore, that, in cases where the original venue proves inadequate to

accommodate all those wishing to attend, valid general meetings of a company can be

properly held using overflow rooms provided, first, that all due steps are taken to direct to

the overflow rooms those unable to get into the main meeting, and secondly, that there

are adequate audio-visual links to enable those in all the rooms to see and hear what is

going on in the other rooms. Were the law otherwise, with the present tendency towards

companies with very large members of shareholders and corresponding uncertainty as to

Page 118: Bbm4101 Company Law

118

how many shareholders will attend meetings, the organization of such meeting might

prove to be impossible.

d) Chairman of general meeting

Presiding officer of the meeting:

A chairman is necessary to conduct a meeting. He is the presiding officer of the meeting.

Unless the Article of a company provides otherwise, the members personally present at

the meeting shall elect one of them to be the chairman of the meeting on a show of hands.

In such a case, the chairman elected on a show of hands shall exercise all the powers of

the chairman. If a poll is demanded on the election of the chairman, it shall be taken

forthwith. If some other person is elected chairman as a result of the poll, he shall be the

chairman for the rest of the meeting. The articles generally provide for the directors

electing a chairman of their meetings, and the chairman so elected is entitled to preside at

a general meeting or in his absence some other director.

But if there is no such chairman or he is not present within fifteen minutes of the time of

holding the meeting or he is unwilling to act:

i. the directors present at the meeting may elect one of their member to be

the chairman of the meeting ; and

ii. if no director is willing to act as chairman or no director is present, the

members present may, as already been said above, choose one of their

number to be the chairman of the meeting.

Importance of Chairman

a) He must act at all times bona fide and in the interests of the company as a

whole.

b) He must ensure that the meeting is properly convened and constituted i.e.

c) He must ensure that the proceedings at the meeting are properly and regularly

conducted

Page 119: Bbm4101 Company Law

119

d) He must ensure that the provisions of the Act and the Articles are observed,

and the business is taken in the order set out in the agenda.

e) He must see that all the business transacted at the meeting is within the scope

of the meeting.

f) He must preserve and maintain order in the meeting and decide any points of

order submitted to him.

g) He must ascertain the sense of the meeting properly with regard to any

question before it. He must do so by putting those motions in their proper

form, and declare the result of the voting.

h) He must decide incidental questions arising for decision during the meeting.

i) He must exercise his casting vote bona fide in the interest of the company i.e.

if articles allow, the chairman may, in the case of an equality of votes

(whether on a show of hands or on a poll) be entitled to a second or casing

vote.

j) He must exercise correctly his power of adjournment and of taking a poll, he

must see that any disorderly persons are removed, and where it is impossible

to maintain order, he should adjourn the meeting. Even if the relevant rules do

not give him the power to adjourn the meeting he may do so on the event of

disorder. The adjournment must be no longer than he considers necessary and

must so far as possible communicate his decision to those present.

k) He must give the members who are present a reasonable and sufficient

opportunity to express their views on the motion or resolution before the

meeting. He must not allow discussion except upon a motion on resolution.

But at the expiration of a reasonable time he is entitled, if he thinks fit, to put

a resolution to the meeting that the discussion be terminated

l) He must also care that the rights of the minority are not ignored.

Page 120: Bbm4101 Company Law

120

Conduct of the Meeting:

The way in which a meeting is to be conducted is a matter for the chairman, with the

assent of the persons properly present, to be determined in the light of the general law

and the company‟s Articles of Association

Proxies:

The term proxy has a double meaning. A member entitled to attend and vote at a meeting

may vote either in person or by proxy. A proxy is an authority to represent and vote for

another person at a meeting. It is also an instrument appointing a person as a proxy. The

person so appointed is also called a proxy. A proxy is not entitled to act contrary to the

instructions of the appointer, the proxy may or may not be a member of the company but

he shall not have any right to speak at the meeting, if the company in question is a public

company except to demand or joining in demanding a poll, and he can only vote on poll.

However, in the case of a private company the person appointed as a proxy has the right

to attend and speak at the meeting. Notice calling a meeting must contain a statement that

a member can appoint a proxy. The right to appoint proxy is provided for under section

13 and any clause in the articles purporting to take away this right is void.

Under section 136 (4) when, for the purpose of any meeting of a company invitation to

appoint particular persons as proxies are sent out by the directors at the company‟s

expense, such proxy instruments must be sent out to all persons entitled to attend the

meeting and vote there at by proxy and not to a selected few.

Voting and poll:

Primarily the voting on a resolution is by show of hands, in which case each person

entitled to vote has one vote only irrespective of the number of shares he may hold. A

proxy, however, cannot vote by a show of hands.

Since voting by show of hands does not always reflect the true interest of a member upon

a value basis, provision has been made in section 137 by virtue of which, except on the

question of the election of a chairman or an adjournment of meeting, the members have a

Page 121: Bbm4101 Company Law

121

statutory right to demand that a poll to be taken. Any provision in the articles which

purports to take away this right is void. The demand for a poll may be made effective:

a) by the chairman;

b) by not less than five members having the right to vote at the meeting;

c) By a member(s) representing not less than one-tenth of the total voting rights of all the

members having the right to vote at the meeting,

d) By a member (s) holding shares in the company conferring a right to vote at the meeting,

being shares on which an aggregate sum has been paid up equal to not less than one –

tenth of the total sum paid up on all the shares conferring that right.

Revocation of Proxies

A proxy is an agent of the person appointing him, i.e. principal. The principal may, unless the

proxy is made irrevocable for valuable consideration, revoke the authority given to his agent

before the authority has been exercised. In cousins vs. International Brink Co. Ltd [1931] 2

ch 90. Lord Hanworth observed in this regard:

„„It would be strange if the person in the position of an agent could say to his principal, you

have entrusted to me a power which I will not allow to pass back to you, although you

demand the right to exercise it‟‟

The right of proxy to vote terminates:

(a) If the shareholder votes before his proxy has voted for him.

(b) If the shareholder who has appointed a proxy dies or become insane.

But usually the article provides against the termination of proxy as a result of either the death or

insanity of the person appointing a proxy. For example, Article73 of Table A provides:

„„A vote given in accordance with the terms of an instrument of proxy shall be valid

notwithstanding the previous death or insanity of the principal or revocation of the proxy or of the

authority under which the proxy was executed‟‟

Resolutions:

The questions which generally come for consideration at the general meeting of a company are

presented in the form of proposals called „motion‟ A motion may be proposed by the chairman of

Page 122: Bbm4101 Company Law

122

the meeting or by any other member of the company. Before it is placed before the meeting by

the chairman for discussion, it must be seconded by someone. The motion, after the close of

discussion, is formally put to vote by a show of hands. It may either be carried or rejected .If a

sufficient number of members demand, the motion may be put to poll. The final result is declared

after the poll is taken. If a motion is carried, it becomes a „resolution.‟

The wishes of a company can be expressed only by resolution of a majority of the members

present and voting at the general meeting which has been properly convened in accordance with

the provisions of the Articles and the Act.

Kinds of Resolution

A part from resolutions of any kind which may be provided for by the articles, the Companies Act

recognizes two types of resolutions:

(a) Ordinary resolution.

(b) Special resolution.

To the two above, a third type has been added i.e.

(c) Resolution requiring special notice.

The category of extraordinary resolution (in U. k. Act) has been abolished, and as per section

405(8) any company carrying on business in Kenya requiring any matter or thing to be done by

passing of an extraordinary resolution, is deemed to have been lawfully and sufficiently done by

passing a special resolution.

In some instances, the Act may design the particular form of resolution required with respect to

specific matters, where the Act does not define the kinds of resolution necessary, the articles may

provide its form. But if neither the Act nor the articles demand a different type of resolution, an

ordinary one suffices.

Ordinary Resolution

An ordinary resolution is a resolution passed at a general meeting of a company by a simple

majority of votes (i.e. votes cast in favour of the resolution exceeds votes cast against it)

including the casting vote of the chairman, if any. The votes may be cast by members in person or

by proxy, where proxies are allowed. The required notice should have been duly given i.e. notice

of 21 days is requires by Article 50 of table A.

Page 123: Bbm4101 Company Law

123

Example: In a general meeting of a company, out of 1,000 members entitled to vote, only 700 are

present. Of the 700, 251 members vote in favour of a resolution, 250 against it, and 199 abstain

from voting. The resolution is passed by a simple majority.

Where the Companies Act, 1948 requires certain things to be done by special resolutions or

resolutions requiring special notice, the memorandum or the Article cannot validly provide that

they may be done in any other manner. The reason being that the two documents are essentially

subordinate to the Act. Ordinary resolution, in the absence of contrary provision in the Articles, is

necessary for the following among other purposes:

(a) To authorize an issue of shares at a discount as per section 59.

(b) To increase the share capital, if authorized by the articles, or otherwise to alter the share

capital apart from a reduction of the subscribed capital i.e. section 63, Article 45 Table A;

(c) To appoint an auditor;

(d) To appoint director;

(e) To declare dividend;

(f) To approve the accounts;

(g) To wind up voluntarily where provision to that effect is made by the articles i.e.

section271

For certain matters the Act requires that special notice of any ordinary resolution must be

given- Section142 state that where special notice is required of a resolution, the resolution is

not effective unless notice of the intention to move it has been given to the company not less

than 28 days before the meeting at which it is moved and the company must give its members

notice of any such resolution at the same time and in the manner as it gives notice of the

meeting ,or, if that is not practicable, must give them notice thereof, either by advertisement

in a newspaper having an appropriate circulation, by the articles, not less than 21 days before

the meeting.

Extraordinary Resolution

Under the U.k. Companies Act, 1948 which was introduced in Kenya the same year, an

extraordinary resolution is one which has been passed by a majority of not less than three –

fourths of such members as being entitled so to do, vote in person, or( where proxies are

allowed) by proxy at a general meeting of which notice specifying the intention to propose

the resolution as extraordinary has been duly given (Section 141)U.k. Act. This category of

Page 124: Bbm4101 Company Law

124

resolution however does not find a place in the Kenya Companies Act and under section 405

(8) any reference to extraordinary resolution in the articles of a company or elsewhere shall

be construed as referring to a special resolution.

Special Resolution

A resolution is a special resolution, says the Act at section141, where it has been passed by a

majority of not less than three fourths of such members as, being entitled go to do, vote in

person or where proxies are allowed: by proxy, at a general meeting of which notice

specifying the intention to propose the resolution as a special resolution has been duly given.

A notice of intention to move the special resolution should be given to the company no less

than 21 days before the meeting at which it is to be moved, and the company should give its

members notice of such resolution along with the notice of the meeting i.e. 21 days notice.

The Act requires the sanction of members by special resolution in respect of the following

matters among others

a) To alter the objects of a company i.e. section 8.

b) To alter the articles. Section 13.

c) To charge the name of the company section 20.

d) to create a reserve liability under section 62

e) to authorize the payment of interest to shares out of capital where such authority is

not given by the articles

f) T o reduce the share capital of a company limited i.e. section 69

g) To appoint inspector to investigate the affairs of a company. i.e. section 166.

h) To make unlimited the liability of directors or managers of a limited company

i.e section204.

i) To authorize an assignment of office by a directories section 205

j) To resolve that a company be would up by order of the court. Section 271

k) To institute a member‟s voluntary winding up. Section 280

Page 125: Bbm4101 Company Law

125

l) To authorize the liquidator to accept shares in consideration for the sale of

company‟s property

The object of requiring a majority of three-fourths of the vote for a special resolution is to

protect the minority in important matters above mentioned relating to the company‟s

affairs. Thus where the Act or the Articles require a special resolution for any purpose, a

three-fourth majority is necessary and a simple majority is not enough (Edward vs.

Hallivell [2 All ER 1064

Resolution Requiring Special Notice

A resolution requiring special notice may be passed by the members at a general meeting

by a simple or three-fourth majority according to the provisions of the Act, in respect of

different matters, provided the following procedures is followed.

A special resolution for which special notice will be invalid unless 28 days‟ notice before

the meeting at which the resolution is to be moved is given to the company by a member.

Special notice is required by the Act in the following matters

a) For a resolution at an annual general meeting appointing as an auditor a

person other than a retiring one i.e. section 160

b) For a resolution at an annual general meeting to provide that a retiring auditor

shall not be appointed

c) For a special resolution to appoint a director who is over any applicable age

limit i.e. Section186(2)

d) For a resolution to remove a director before the expiry of his period of office,

or to appoint another director in place of the removed director i.e. section

185(2)

Registration of Resolution

Section 143 makes it compulsory for a company to file with the Registrar of Companies

printed copies of the following resolutions and agreements within thirty days after the

passing or making thereof.

Page 126: Bbm4101 Company Law

126

a) Special resolutions

b) Resolution which have been agreed to by all the members or class of

members.

c) Resolution requiring a company to be voluntarily wound up passed under

paragraphs (a) of sub-section(1) of section276

d) All resolution or agreements which effectively bind all members of any class

of shareholders though not agreed to by all those members

A copy of every such resolution or agreement must be embodied or annexed to every

copy of registered articles issued after the passing of the resolution or the making of

the agreement.

If default is made in filing any of the above, the company and each officer in default

is liable to a fine up to twenty shillings for every day of default.

Amendment

Any relevant amendment may be proposed where an ordinary resolution of which

proper notice has been given, provided it is within the business covered by the notice

of the meeting

e) Minutes of meetings

Section 145 of the Act provides that every company must keep minutes containing a

fair and correct summary of all proceedings of general meetings and directors

meetings in the books kept for that purpose.

Any minute purporting to be signed by the chairman of a meeting is evidence of the

proceedings of the meeting to which it relates.

Summary for the topic

The meaning of meeting

Importance of company meetings

Classification of company meetings

The requisites of a valid meeting

Page 127: Bbm4101 Company Law

127

Revision Questions

a) Explain the meaning of meeting

b) Explain importance of company meetings

c) Explain classification of company meetings

d) Describe the requisites of a valid meeting

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 200-

217

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 235-259

Oliver.M,Marshal E.A,Company Law Pitman Publishing London UK Pages

242-270

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK

Pages 462-477

Cheeseman.H,R (1998) Business Law, Prentice Hall International, London U.K

Pages 626-629

Marsh,Soulsby (1998)Business Law Stanley Thorns(Publishers)Limited, Cheltenham UK

Pages 118-122

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law, Reed Elsevier(UK) Limited, London UK

Pages 366-383

Page 128: Bbm4101 Company Law

128

LESSON 9: SHARE CAPITAL

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Explain the meaning of share capital

b) Describe various types of types of share capital

c) Explain the classes of shares

d) Explain the meaning of stocks

e) Explain the alteration of capital

f) Describe the variation of shareholders rights

9.1 Meaning of share capital

Capital denotes a particular amount of money with which a business is started. In the case

of a company, the word capital means the share capital i.e. the money raised by the issue

of shares: the word „capital‟ in connection with a company is used in several senses. It

may mean authorized issued and subscribed or paid up or reserved capital of the

company.

9.2 Types of share capital

1. Authorized or Nominal Capital:

Every company limited by shares or limited by guarantee and having share capital is

required to have a nominal or authorized capital with which it proposes to be

registered. This is the nominal value of the shares which a company is authorized to

issue by its Memorandum of Association. This is the maximum capital which the

company will have during its lifetime unless it is increased or reduced depending on

the financial requirement of the company. This is also known as registered capital.

Page 129: Bbm4101 Company Law

129

2. Issued Capital:

Issued capital is the nominal value of the shares which are offered to the public

for subscription. A company does not normally issue capital at once, so that

issued capital in such a case is less than the authorized capital. The issued capital

can never exceed the authorized capital; it can at the most be equal to the

authorized capital which is the case when all the shares have been issued to the

public.

3. Subscribed Capital:

This refers to that part of the company‟s issued capital which has been taken up or

subscribed by the public. In the case of reputed companies with a lot of goodwill,

the entire issued capital may be subscribed by the public, but in unsound

companies the subscribed capital may be less than the issued capital.

4. Called – up Capital:

This is that part of the issued capital which has been called up on the shares. It is

total amount called upon the shares issued and which the shares – holders

continue to be liable to pay as and when called.

5. Paid-up Capital:

This is that part of the issued capital which has been paid up by the shareholders

or which is credited as paid up on the shares .Often some shareholders fail to pay

the calls made on them and the amount thus owing is known as “calls in arrears”

or “calls unpaid”

6. Reserved Capital:

This is any part of the company‟s share capital; which a company may resolve by

a special resolution not to be called except in the event of a winding up. Section

62 of the Act states thus in this regard.

“A limited company may by special resolution determine that any portion of its

share capital which has not been already called up shall not be capable of being

called up except in the event and for the purpose aforesaid.”

Page 130: Bbm4101 Company Law

130

Reserve capital cannot be turned into uncalled capital without the leave of the

court. It is available only for the creditors on the winding up of the company. The

company can neither charge reserve capital nor cancel it in reduction of capital

(Midland Rly Carriage Co. Re (1904) W.N 175).

Reserve capital must be distinguished from reserve or reserve fund. The

expressions reserve and reserve fund are applied to undistributed profit which the

company keeps in cash to provide for emergencies.

9.3 Classes of shares

The capital of a company is divided into certain indivisible units of a fixed amount called

shares. J. Farwel in the case of Boorland‟s Trustee vs. Steel Bros (1901) 1 ch 279 defines

a share as the interest of a shareholders in the company measured by a sum of money for

the purpose of liability in the first place and or interest in the second place but also

consist of a series of mutual covenants entered into by all the shareholders.

A company is not legally obligated to issue all its shares ranking „Pari Passu‟ i.e with

shareholders sharing the benefits equally, and can offer different classes of shares with

different rights attached to them. However, a company may divide its shares into

different classes only if so authorized by its Articles or Memorandum. Often the different

rights and privileges are issued to attract different types of investors.

Shares of a company may be classified as under:-

a) preference shares

b) ordinary or equity shares

c) corporate shares

d) deferred of founder‟s shares

e) unclassified shares

Various classes are explained as under:-

Page 131: Bbm4101 Company Law

131

a) Preference shares

This is the highest class of shares a company can create because as the name suggests it

gives preference to the holders thereof over the holders of the other classes of shares. The

preference here is in respect of the following matters.

i.When a divided is declared, the holders of preference shares are the first to receive

payment.

ii.When receiving dividends, preference shareholders are paid at a fixed rate agreed

upon e.g. they will receive the divided at a rate of 5%. For this reason, the

company must pay them the dividend at the rate of 5%. Where the dividend at

the rate of 5% accrues it is considered as debt owing from the company and

must be paid during winding up if not yet settled. In the case of the holder of the

other classes of shares, they are not paid divided at any fixed rate but it depends

upon the amount of dividend declared by the company and available for

distribution. If the dividend declared is large they may end up earning more than

the preference shareholders. As far as dividends are concerned, preference

shareholders can boast of a steady rate of income form their investment in this

class of shares.

Preference shares are also preferential as to capital i.e when a company goes into

liquidation and all its creditors are paid, the balance of assets constitute capital which

must be returned to members of the company. It must pay the holders of preference

shares first then if there is any surplus it can distribute the same to other classes.

Preference shareholders have no priority as to the surplus assets in the winding up, unless

it is expressly given by the articles .If no such priority is given, all the shareholders are

paid equally on the winding up of the company after.

a) the discharge of all liabilities;

b) the payment of winding up expenses; and

c) the repayment of capital

Page 132: Bbm4101 Company Law

132

If, however, the preference shares are made preferential as to capital any surplus assets of

the company after payment of company‟s debts will be applied first in paying off

preference shares. But it should be noted that a right to priority of payment of capital is

not itself a right to participate in surplus capital.

In Re Isle of Thanet Electricity Co. Ltd (1950, the company‟s article conferred on the

preference shareholders the right in priority to the ordinary shareholders to a six per cent

divided and to repayment of capital in a winding up with any arrears of dividends. It was

held that preference shareholders were not entitled to share in surplus assets on winding

up.

Voting Right of Preference Shares

Preference shares, like debentures, entitle the holders to receive dividends and interest at

fixed rates, and so long as the fixed preferential dividend is regularly paid, the holders

have no justification to interfere with the company‟s management. Thus, in the case of

preference shares, the right to vote at meetings is usually restricted by providing that they

shall have no right to attend such meetings or to vote there unless:

a) their special rights are being varied; of

b) the meeting is called to wind up the company;

c) their dividend is in arrears for more than six months.

Similarly, debenture holders being creditors of the company have no voting rights

whereas ordinary shares carry full voting rights. Whenever preference shareholders are,

however, authorized to vote by the poll, their shares are weighted more than other

classes. Weighting here means so many votes will be allocated to each share a member

holds so that when such a member votes, his votes are calculated by multiplying each

share by the number of votes attached to each share. Usually, the Articles weighs

preference shares more that the other classes of shares.

Classes of Preference Shares

Preference shares are further sub classified into the following sub – classes:-

a) Cumulative or non – cumulative preference shares

Page 133: Bbm4101 Company Law

133

When preference shares are designated as being cumulative it means that any

arrears of divided declared in previous years are not lost but will keep on

accumulating and the company must pay those arrears in subsequent years when

dividends are declared or before liquidation which ever is earliest. However,

when preference shares are non-cumulative, the holders of those shares are

entitled to receive a fixed percentage as dividend out of the profits of each year,

but in case no profits are available in a particular year, they will not be entitled to

the missed divided in any subsequent year. However, the preference shares are

legally deemed to be cumulative, unless the company‟s article specifically makes

them non-cumulative.

b) Participating or non – participating preference shares.

Participating preference shares are those that are not only entitled to a fixed rate

of divided but also to a share in the surplus profits which remain after the claims

of the equity shareholders (up to a limit say 15 %) have been met. The surplus

profits are distributed in a certain agreed ratio between the holders of the

participating preference shares and the holders of equity shares. Non –

participating preference shares are those that earn dividends at fixed rates only

once whether or not there is a surplus still available for distribution to the

members.

c) Redeemable preference shares (S.60)

The registered companies are not as a rule to repay any of their share capital

without deciding on this by a special resolution of the shareholders, which would

have to be approved by the law courts. Preference shares constitute an exception

to this rule in that a company may, subject to its articles, issue Redeemable

Preference Shares. Section 60 permits a company, if so authorized by its articles

to issue redeemable preference shares. The redemption is only possible if it is

effected in accordance with the following statutory conditions:-

a. The shares must be fully paid up.

b. They must be redeemed,

Page 134: Bbm4101 Company Law

134

i. out of the profits of the company which would otherwise be available for

dividends; or

ii. out of the proceeds of a new issue of shares made for the purpose of redemption

c. That any premium payable on redemption must come out of the

company‟s profits.

d. Where the shares are redeemed out of profits a sum equal to the

value of the redeemed share shall be transferred from the company‟s profits to

special reserve fund known as the Capital Redemption Reserve Fund.

Note: - To redeem means to buy back i.e. a company is buying back the shares it has

issued to this class of shareholders.

b) Ordinary shares

Ordinary shares are also referred to as the equity capital. Members holding them are said

to have the equity in the company and equity here means ownership of the company. This

is because just as much as they take the lions‟ share of the company‟s profits when

dividends are declared handsomely; they also take the great part of the company‟s

financial losses, because they invest their money without having any sort of assurance

that they will be paid any interest on their investment. The holders of such shares receive

dividends out of the profits as determined by the directors and declared by the members

in the annual general meeting. If there are preference shares, the divided on ordinary

shares is paid after the payment of divided on preference shares as per right given by the

articles.

As the ordinary shares carry the main financial risks, they are entitled to the following

rights which are not available in respect of other shares:-

a. After providing for any divided which is payable on preference

shares, the whole of the profits can be made available to them.

b. They are entitled by use of their voting power at the general

meeting to control the company.

Page 135: Bbm4101 Company Law

135

c. In winding up, the holders of the ordinary shares are entitled to the

entire residue after payment of the company‟s liabilities.

c) Corporate shares

These are shares created by a company for issue to its employees. They are therefore,

shares that serve special purpose. They are usually given to employees as a means of

winning their co-operation with the company‟s management and owners. Normally, the

company pays for them to the employees as fully paid up shares. Since the employees

will one day leave the company employment, the company‟s trustees will look after these

shares in the event of an employee leaving the company.

These shares are normally issued without voting rights but have the right to earn

dividends. They are also issued at the par value usually lower than that of ordinary

shares.

d) Deferred of founder’s shares

Apart from the classes listed above, the company can issue shares known as founder‟s or

deferred shares in priority to the ordinary shares. Deferred shares are usually given the

right to a portion of the profits if the dividends on ordinary shares exceed a certain fixed

amount.

Frequently, this type of share is issued to the founders of the company (i.e.the promoters)

as a reward for their services. They are usually very few in number and carry a right to

the residual profit when other shareholders have been paid. The Companies Act

recognizes such types of shares. The number of founders or management or deferred

shares and the interest of the holders in property and profits of the company must be set

out in the prospectus.

Note: As a matter of practice, founders of companies have become very sophisticated.

They do not like being given those shares because they are onerous for nothing.

Founders, therefore, prefer to be given preference shares which are of course cumulative

and participating nature.

Page 136: Bbm4101 Company Law

136

e) Unclassified shares

Professor Gower in the 3rd

edition of his book on Company Law has indicated that a

company may also have a further category of shares. These are shares not falling in any

of the above classes. They can remain unclassified until the company designates a class

for them.

9.4 Stocks

Instead of creating or maintaining its capital in shares, a company can decide to convert

its shares into stocks and issue the same to the members. A stock, by definition, is one

unit of a company‟ capital comprising several number of shares put together e.g. a

company may decide that every ten shares shall be converted to constitute one stock so

that instead of members buying shares they buy stocks each one of which represents ten

shares. A stock is, therefore, a large unit of the company‟s capital as compared to share.

When a company decides to consolidate its shares into stocks consolidation does not alter

the par value, indeed the total value of shares comprised in one stock becomes the value

of the stock they constitute. This means the interest of the members and their obligations

in respect of shares converted into stock remains not – withstanding the fact that those

shares have been converted into stock.

The conditions under which shares may be converted into stocks or vice versa are

governed by sections 63 and 64 of the Act, read together with articles 40-43 of Table A

or the First Schedule to the Act. These conditions may be summarized as under:

i. It must be the type of company that is allowed to convert its shares. According

to section 63 (1) (c), companies which are permitted to convert shares into

stocks are companies which are registered as „Limited‟ By the necessary

implications, they must be companies hav9ing share capital.

ii. Conversion can only be undertaken if only the Articles of Association of the

company in question contain express provisions to that effect. Where the

article is silent, the company cannot undertake such conversion. However, if

the company wishes to do so, it must first necessarily alter the articles to make

a provision for conversion i.e section 63 (1).

Page 137: Bbm4101 Company Law

137

iii. Only the company itself can take a decision to convert shares into stocks. For

this reason, director‟s f a company do not have the authority in law to make

this decision. By virtue of articles 40 of table A, the members by an ordinary

resolution can take a decision to convert shares into stocks.

iv. the shares to be converted must only be shares which are full paid for by the

members, i.e Article 40 read together with section 63 (2).

v. Where a company has taken a decision to convert shares into stocks, that

company must give notice of conversion t the registrar of companies within

thirty days for the date the resolution was taken i.e. section 64 (1). If default is

made every officer responsible shall suffer default fine as per section 64 (1)

In Pilkington vs United Railway of Havana (1930) 2 ch 108, it was said that after the

shares have been converted into stocks and have been issued to stockholders, any

share certificate they had should be substituted with stock certificate. The

company should not issue the stock holders with the stock warrants

SHARES STOCKS

A share is a distinct individual unit of

capital in a company and shares

can be bought and sold in whole

units.

Under the Companies Act, shares are

required to be distinguished.

A company can issue shares directly.

Stock is not divided into equal parts

or denominations and subject to

articles may be bought or sold in

any convenient multiples or

subdivisions.

Stocks, even if divided into units for

convenience, bear no

distinguishing numbers.

But a company cannot issue stock

directly; it can only convert its

fully paid shares into stock.

Page 138: Bbm4101 Company Law

138

Note: stocks cannot be issued in the first instance, but can only emerge from the

conversion of fully paid shares.

9.5 Alteration of capital

Power to alter capital (section 63):

A company limited by shares or guarantee having a share capital may if, so authorized by

its Articles, alter its shares capital as follows:

a) Increase its nominal share capital by issuing new share capital of any amount.

b) Consolidate and divide all or any part of its share capital into shares of larger

amount.

c) Convert all or any of its paid-up shares into stock and reconvert such stocks

into paid-up shares of any denomination.

d) Sub-divide its shares into shares of smaller amount but the proportion between

the amount paid and the amount (if any) unpaid on each reduced share must

remain the same.

e) Cancel shares which have not been taken. Such cancellations will not be

deemed to be resection of share capital

The provisions of the above section establish some firm rules as to all modes of alteration

of capital. According to section 63 no alteration of capital can be valid unless:-

It is authorized by the articles; and

It is approved by the company in a general meeting.

Increase in Share Capital

The nominal share capital of a company may be increased, even though it has not yet

issued all its authorized capital, by ordinary resolution of the company in a general

meeting. The company‟s articles usually contain the authority to allow the company to

increase it capital but in case the articles do not allow it must be altered by special

resolution to this effect.

Page 139: Bbm4101 Company Law

139

“The company may from time to time by ordinary resolution increase the share capital by

such sum to be divided into shares of such amount as resolution shall prescribe”.

Section 65 provides that where a company has increased its share capital beyond the

registered capital, notice must be given to the Registrar within thirty days from the date

of a passing the resolution by which the increase is effected. Such a notice must be

accompanied with particulars of the conditions on which the new shares are issued. In

case of default, the company and every director or other officers of the company

knowingly permitting the default will be liable to a fine of one hundred shillings.

Further issue of capital – right issues

Further issue of capital of a company may take place:-

a) By allotment of new shares

b) By conversion of debentures or loans into shares.

A public company limited by share may at any time increase its subscribed share capital

(within the limit of authorized capital) by issuing new shares. It is for the directors to

decide whether an increase in the subscribed capital of the company is necessary or not.

The obligation cast upon them is that if new shares (known as rights shares) are issued

these shall be offered to the members in proportion to the existing shares held by each of

them. They cannot offer these shares to any persons at their discretion. The object of this

requirement is to prevent:-

i. Discrimination amongst shareholders by ensuring equitable

distribution of shares among them; and

ii. Directors from offering shares to outsiders before they are offered

to the shareholders.

The right of shareholders to be offered new shares to them before they are offered to the

public is known as “shareholders right of pre - emption”.

Page 140: Bbm4101 Company Law

140

Reduction of share capital

The law regards the capital of a company as something sacred. The general principle of

law founded on principles of public policy and rightly enforced by courts is that no action

resulting in a reduction of capital of a company should be permitted unless the reduction

is effected:-

i. Under statutory authority or by forfeiture; and

ii. In strict accordance with procedure if any laid down in the articles of association.

Any reduction of capital contrary to this principle is illegal and ultra vires.

A reduction of capital may be effected in different ways. Section 63 (e) provides that if

the articles permit un – issued shares may be cancelled which will diminish the amount of

the nominal capital of the company. The diminution of capital does not constitute a

reduction within the meaning of the aforesaid section and can be effected without

obtaining the consent of the court, by an ordinary resolution if this procedure is

authorized by the article.

However, a reduction of capital in any other form must be carried out in conformity with

the provisions of section 68. According to this section, a company limited by shares or

guarantee can reduce its capital if:-

a) Authorized by the articles;

b) A special resolution has been passed to this effect; and

c) It has been confirmed by the courts.

Section 68 gives the company the power to reduce its share capital in any way but

specifically mentions the following ways in which the reduction of capital may be

effected. It may:-

a) Extinguish or reduce the liability on shares not fully paid up, e.g. if the shares are

one hundred shillings each with fifty shillings paid up reducing them to fifty

Page 141: Bbm4101 Company Law

141

shilling [paid – up shares and thus relieving the shareholders from paying the

balance on the shares.

b) Cancel paid – up capital which is lost or unrepresented by the available assets

either with or without extinguishing of reducing the liability on any shares.

c) pay off any paid – up capita; in excess of the wants of he company either with or

without extinguishing or reducing the liability on any shares and may so far as

necessary alter its memorandum by reducing the amount of share capital; and

shares accordingly.

Under section 69, where a company has passed a resolution for reduction of capital it

must apply to the courts for an order confirming the reduction. Where the reduction of

share capital involves diminution of liability for unpaid capital or return to any

shareholder of any paid – up share capital, the courts may allow all creditors to object to

reduction

For this purpose, the courts will settle a list of company‟s creditors and hear their

objection, if any. The courts may confirm such a reduction on any terms they think fit on

being satisfied that:-

a) The creditor‟s consent to the reduction has been obtained

b) Their debts have been discharged

c) Their debts have been secured by the company

Where the courts confirm such reduction they may direct the company to add the words

„And reduced‟ to its name for a fixed period and to publish the reasons for reduction for

the information of the public.

Member’s liability on reduced shares

Section 72 provides that in the case of a reduction of share capital, a past present or

member of the company will not be liable for calls or other contributions as regards the

Page 142: Bbm4101 Company Law

142

amount by which the nominal amount of the shares has been reduced. but if the company

becomes unable to pay in debts, within one year after the reduction, the creditors who by

reason of their ignorance of the reduction were not entered on the register of creditors can

claim the reduced amount against:-

a) Every person who was a member of the company at the date of the registration of

the order reduction. The liability of such a person to contribute is limited to such

an amount which he would have been liable to contribute before such date of

registration.

b) If the company is wound up, the courts, on application of such creditor and upon

proof of his ignorance of the reduction, may accordingly settle a new list of

contributories in a winding up.

9.6 Variation of shareholders rights

The shares in a company may be equity shares (ordinary) and or preference shares.

Usually, the rights attaching to different classes of shares are different. These rights may

be set out either in the articles of association or the memorandum of association.

Where the share capital of a company is so divided into such different classes of shares

with specific rights attached to each class such rights may be varied with the cost in

writing of not less than three – fourths of the issued shares of that class. This can be done

by circulating the resolution among all the shareholders of that class and obtaining the

consent of the shareholders of at least three fourths of the issued shares. The consent may

also be obtained at a separate meeting of the holders of those shares by three – fourths

majority.

The variation by either procedure is possible only if provision for such variation is

contained in the memorandum or articles of the company or even without such provisions

as long as the variation is not prohibited by the terms of issue of the shares of that class.

Page 143: Bbm4101 Company Law

143

Section 74 empowers dissident members to apply to the courts for the cancellation of the

variation. Thus if the holders of 15 % of the issued shares of that class who had not

assented to the variation apply to the courts within thirty days of the date of the consent

or the passing of the resolution, the courts after hearing the interested parties may either:

a) Confirm the variation; or

b) Cancel it.

The court‟s decision in this respect is final and the company must within thirty days of

the service of the court order forward a copy of the order to the registrar.

9.7 Prohibition of financial assistance

A company as a general rule may not by means of a loan, guarantee, or the provision of

security or otherwise directly provide financial assistance for purchase by any person of

shares in the company or where the company is a subsidiary, in its holding company.

However, this prohibition does not apply where:

a) The lending of money is part of the ordinary business of the company.

b) Money is provided under a scheme for the purchase by trustee of fully paid

shares in the company or its holding company to be held for the benefit of

employees.

c) The company gives loan to its employees (other than directors) to enable them

to purchase fully paid shares in the company to be held by them.

Summary for the topic

Meaning of share capital

Types of types of share capital

Classes of shares

Meaning of stocks

Alteration of capital

Variation of shareholders rights

Page 144: Bbm4101 Company Law

144

Revision Questions

a) Explain the meaning of share capital

b) Describe various types of types of share capital

c) Explain the classes of shares

d) Explain the meaning of stocks

e) Explain the alteration of capital

f) Describe the variation of shareholders rights

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 123-

162

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 125-139

Oliver.M,Marshal E.A,Company Law Pitman Publishing London UK Pages 144-203

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK

Pages 388-398

Cheeseman.H,R (1998) Business Law, Prentice Hall International, London U.K

Pages 615-623

Marsh,Soulsby (1998)Business Law Stanley Thorns(Publishers)Limited, Cheltenham UK

Pages 106-116

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law, Reed Elsevier(UK) Limited, London UK Pages 117-

220

Page 145: Bbm4101 Company Law

145

LESSON 10: MAJORITY RIGHTS AND MINORITY PROTECTION

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Explain the meaning of majority power

b) Explain the meaning of the principle of majority rule

c) Explain the meaning of protection of minority shareholders or exception to the

rules in foss-v- harbottle

10.1 Majority power

Supremacy of the majority is the fundamental principle of company law. Generally, a

majority of members of a company is entitled to exercise the powers of the company and

generally to control its affair. There is no doubt that directors enjoys wide powers in

respect of controlling, directing and managing the affairs of a company but one must not

forget the fact that directors are elected by majority shareholders. The act lays down

certain matters which can be decided by the shareholders at general meetings by simple

majority, whereas certain more important matter can be decided by special majority of

three –forth of the company, it is the wish of the majority share holders that prevails. The

majority shareholders determine the fate of the company.

10.2 The principle of majority rule

The principle of majority rule was recognized in Foss-v- Harbottle.The rule in Foss-v-

Harbottle is known as the „‟Majority Rule‟‟ or „proper plaintiff principle‟‟

The rule is that the proper plaintiff in an action to redress an alleged wrong to a company

on the part of any one, whether director, member or outsider , or to recover money or

damages alleged to be done to it, is „prima facie‟the company and where the alleged

Page 146: Bbm4101 Company Law

146

wrong is any irregularity which might be made binding on the company by a simple

majority of members, no individuals member can bring an action in respect of it.

In Foss-v- Harbottle two minority shareholders in a company alleged that its directors

were guilty of buying their own land for the company‟s use paying themselves a price

greater than its value. This act of the directors resulted in a loss to a company. The

minority shareholders therefore decided to take an action for damages against the

directors. The shareholders in a general meeting, by majority resolved not to take any

action against the directors alleging that they were not responsible for the loss which had

incurred. The court dismissed the suit on the ground that the acts of directors were

capable of confirmation by the majority of members and held that the proper plaintiff for

wrongs done to the company is the company itself and not the minority shareholder, and

the company can act only through its majority shareholders.

The rational of the above rules is that a company is a separate legal entity from the

members who compose it. As such, if any right of the company is violated, it is the

company which can bring an action.

The principle laid down in Foss –v-Harbottle was stated by Mellish L.J in Macdougall –

v- ; Gardianer in these words.‟ If the thing complained is a thing which, in substance ,the

majority of the company are entitled to do legally, there can be no use in having litigation

about it, the ultimate end of which is only that a meeting has to be called, and then

ultimately the majority gets its wishes.‟

Similarly Lord Davey in Burland v.Ealre observed as follows.‟ It is an elementary

principle of Law relating to joint stock companies that the court will not interfere with the

internal management of companies acting within their powers and has in fact no

jurisdiction to do so. Again, it is clear law that in order to redress a wrong done to the

company or to recover monies or damages due to the company, the action should prima

facie be brought by the company itself.

In Macdougall vs. Gardiner (1875) ch D13, the articles of the company empowered the

chairman, with the consent of the members in a meeting to adjourn a meeting, and also

provided for taking a poll if demanded by the shareholders. The adjournment was moved

Page 147: Bbm4101 Company Law

147

and declared by the chairperson. A shareholder brought an action for declaration that the

chairperson‟s conduct was illegal. It was held that the shareholder could not bring the

action, if the chairman was wrong the company could sue.

Advantage of rule in Foss vs. Harbottle

1. Recognition of the separate legal personality of a company i.e if a company has

suffered some injuries, and not the individuals members, it is the company itself

which can seek redress,

2. Need to preserve the right of the majority to decide i.e. the principle in Foss Vs

Harbottle preserves the right of the majority to decide how the affairs of the

company shall be conducted. It is but fair that the wish of the majority should

prevail.

3. Multiplicity of futile suits avoided i.e clearly, if every individual member were

permitted to sue anyone who has injured the company through a breach of duty

there could be enormous waste of time and money

4. Litigation suit of a minority is futile if majority do not wish it. If the irregularity

complained of is one which can be subsequently ratified by the majority. It is

futile to have litigation about it except with the consent of the majority in a

general meeting

10.3 Protection of minority shareholders or exception to the rules in foss-v-

harbottle

It has become clear from the „Rule in Foss –v- Harbotle that it is the majority rule

that prevail in company management. Such wide powers concentrated in their

hands may be misused to exploit the minority shareholders and to serve their

personal ends. The possibility of such domination will be even more in case of

private companies where a few individuals may hold a majority of shares. It is,

therefore, rightly pointed that „a proper balance of the rights of the majority and

minority shareholders is essential for the smooth functioning of the company.

Page 148: Bbm4101 Company Law

148

In order to prevent the majority from misusing this privilege and at the same time

to ensure justice to minority shareholders, certain exceptions to Foss v Harbottle

have been admitted, which are as follow.

a) Acts which are ultra vires or illegal

It may be noted that the rule in Foss v, Harbottle will apply only when the act done by the

majority is one, which the company is authorized by its memorandum to do. Any act

done by the majority beyond the object clause is ultra vires and it cannot be ratified even

if every shareholder is willing to do so. In the case of the ultra vires acts even a single

shareholders can restrain the company from committing those acts by filing a suit of

injunction .Similarly, the majority rule will not apply where the act in question is illegal.

b) Act support by insufficient majority

For certain acts, the Act or the articles of the company require a special majority of three-

fourths of the shareholders. The rule in Foss-v-Harbottle cannot be invoked to override,

these requirement by a resolution passed by a simple majority. If the requirement of a

special majority is not fulfilled, any shareholder can return the company from acting on

the resolution

c) Where the act of majority constitute a fraud on minority

The rule in Foss v.Harbottle will not apply to such acts of majority which constitute a

fraud on minority. Majority powers must be exercised bona fide for the benefit of the

company as whole. A resolution would constitute a fraud on minority if its not bona fide

for the benefit of the company as a whole. In such cases, the decision of the majority can

bee challenged by the minority. Similarly, an action of the majority which discriminate

between majority shareholders and minority shareholders would constitute a fraud of

minority, „‟A special resolution would be liable to be impeached if the effect of it were to

discriminate between the majority shareholders and minority shareholder, so as to give

the former an advantage of which the latter were deprived,‟ The following cases would

illustrate the concept of fraud on minority.

Page 149: Bbm4101 Company Law

149

Cokes v.Deeks.in this case the director of a railway construction company obtained a

contract in their own names to construct a railway line. The contract was obtained under

circumstances which amounted to breach of trust by the director who then used their

voting powers to pass a resolution of the company declaring that the company had no

interest in the contract. It was held that the benefit of the contract belongs in equity to the

company and that the director could not benefit themselves at the expense of the

minority. If it were not checked, this would be tantamount to allowing a majority to

oppress the minority.

Brown v. British Abrasive Wheel co, The majority shareholders holding ninety-eight per

cent of the shares were willing to subscribe further capital which the company badly

needed, but only if they were able to acquire the shareholding of the minority. They

passed a special resolution to alter the articles to enable them purchase the minority share

compulsory on certain terms. The plaintiff refused to sell its shares and challenged the

validity of the majority resolution. It was decided that the alteration was not for the

benefit of the company but for the benefit of the majority and accordingly an injuction

was granted against the company prohibiting it from carrying out the resolution.

d) Where it is alleged that the personal membership rights of the plaintiff

shareholder have been infringed.

Every shareholder has individuals membership rights against the company, conferred

either by the companies Act or the articles of the company .Such individual membership

rights include the right to attend meetings, the right to receive dividends, the right to

insist on strict observance of the legal rules, statutory provisions in the memorandum and

articles,etc.If such a right is in question, a single shareholder can, on principle, defy a

majority consisting of all other shareholders. The rule in Foss v. Harbotle has no

application so far as these individual membership rights are concerned. If any

individual‟s membership right is infringed, he can sue in his own name, and this right of

action is unaffected by any decision of the majority. Thus, where the chairman of a

meeting at the time of taking a poll ruled out certain votes, which should have been

included, a suit by the shareholder concerned was held to the validly filed. Again where

Page 150: Bbm4101 Company Law

150

the chairman rejects the candidature of a shareholder for directorship, it is an individual

wrong in respect of which suit is maintainable.

e) Where there is a breach of duty

The minority shareholders may bring an action against the company where there is a

breach of duty by the director and majority shareholders to the detriment of the company.

In this case, the action will be allowed even where there is no fraud.

In Daniel vs Daniels (1978) ch .406 a company, on the instruction of the two directors

(who were husband and wife) having majority shareholder sold the company‟s lands to

one of then (the wife) at gross undervalue. The minority shareholder brought an action

against the directors and the company, it was held that the company and minority

shareholder had valid cause of action as the director knew or ought to have known that

the sale was at a gross undervalue.

Summary for the topic

Meaning of majority power

Meaning of the principle of majority rule

Protection of minority shareholders or exception to the rules in Foss-v- Harbottle

Page 151: Bbm4101 Company Law

151

Revision Questions

a) Explain the principle of ‘majority rule’ Are there any exceptions? Discuss them

b) Explain the rule of supremacy of the majority of shareholder with all its

exception

c) Describe the concept of minority shareholder

d) State the rule in Foss V,Harbottle?

e) What constitute the exceptions to this rule?

f) Muiruri shareholder of kamukunji Land Buying Co.Ltd.The article of

Association of the company state that the voting will be done by show of hands.

At a meeting to resolves, a long-standing disagreement between members over a

land buying issue, Muiruri votes against the expectations of the Chairman of

the Board of Director who loudly declines to record his votes.Muiruri considers

this as directly against the interest of the company and contemplates suing the

chairman. Advise Muiruri.

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 219-

225

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 288-293

Oliver.M,Marshal E.A,Company Law Pitman Publishing London UK Pages 415-424

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK

Pages 417-424

Marsh,Soulsby (1998)Business Law Stanley Thorns(Publishers)Limited, Cheltenham UK

Pages 129-132

Miller.R,Gaylord.J (1991) Business Law Today, West Educational Publishing

Company,USA. Pages 685-685

Page 152: Bbm4101 Company Law

152

LESSON 11: ACCOUNTS AND AUDITORS

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) To explain requirements of what should be captured by the Books of Account

b) To explain the various financial statements that should be presented to the

shareholders

c) To explain the manner of presentation of group accounts to the shareholders

d) To explain the manner of appointment ,remuneration and disqualification of

the auditors

11.1 Introduction

The Companies Act makes it mandatory for registered companies to keep prescribed books of

account and to prepare certain accounts which are to be presented from time to time to the

company‟s members for consideration.

11.2 Books of Account

By s. 147 (1) every company shall cause to be kept in the English language proper books of

account‟ with respect to:

(a) All sums of money received and expended by the company and the matters in respect of

which the receipt and expenditure takes place;

(b) All sales and purchases of goods by the company;

(c) The assets and liabilities of the company.

S. 147 (2) provides that proper books of account shall be deemed not to have been kept with

respect to the matters aforesaid if there are not kept such books as are necessary to give a true and

fair view of the state of the company‟s affairs and to explain its transactions.

By s. 147 (3) (a) the books of account are to be kept at the registered office of the company or

with the consent of the Registrar and subject to such conditions as he may impose, at such other

place as the directors think fit, and shall at all times be open to inspection by the directors.

Page 153: Bbm4101 Company Law

153

a) Profit and loss account

S. 148 (1) provides that the directors of every company shall, at some date not later than eighteen

months after the incorporation of the company and subsequently once at least in every calendar

year, lay before the company in general meeting a profit and loss account for the period, in the

case of the first account, since the incorporation of the company, and, in any other case, since the

preceding account. The account shall be made up to a date not earlier than the date of the meeting

by more than nine months or, in the case of a company carrying on business or having interests

abroad, by more than twelve months.

A company which does not trade for profit is required to lay an income and expenditure account

instead of a profit and loss account. The period during which the accounts have to be laid before

the general meeting may be expended by the Registrar for any special reasons.

b) Balance Sheet

Section 148 (2) provides that the directors cause to be made out in every calendar year, and to be

laid before the company in general meeting, a balance sheet as at the date to which the profit and

loss account or the income and expenditure account (as the case may be) is made up.

Contents

By s. (149 (1), every balance sheet shall give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the

company as at the end of its financial year and every profit and loss account shall give a true and

fair view of the profit and loss of the company for the financial year.

By s. 149 (2), a company‟s balance sheet and profit and loss account shall comply with the

requirements of the Sixth Schedule to the Act so far as applicable (subject to such modifications

as the Registrar may, on the application or with the consent of the company‟s directors, allow).

The detailed contents of the Sixth Schedule are dealt with during the accounting lectures which

accountancy students issued. They are supplemented by the various Kenyan Accounting

Standards issued by the Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Kenya and are beyond the

scope of this book.

c) Group Accounts

S. 150 (1) provides that it, at the end of its financial year, a company has subsidiaries, then it must

include in its annual accounts „group accounts‟ dealing with the affairs of the subsidiaries as well.

Page 154: Bbm4101 Company Law

154

By s. 150 (2) (b) group accounts need not deal with a subsidiary of the company if the company‟s

directors are of the opinion that:

(a) It is impracticable, or would be of no real value to the members of the company, in view of

the insignificant amounts involved, or would involve expense or delay out of proportion to

the value to members of the company; or,

(b) The result would be misleading; or

(c) The result would be harmful to the business of the company or any of its subsidiaries; or

(d) The business of the holding company and that of the subsidiary are so different that they

cannot reasonably be treated as a single undertaking.

The approval of the Registrar shall be required for not dealing n group accounts with a subsidiary

on grounds (c) or (d).

By s. 150 (2) (a), a company is exempt from the obligation to prepare group accounts if it is a

wholly owned subsidiary of another body corporate incorporated in Kenya.

Form

S. 151 (1) provides that the group accounts laid before a holding company shall be consolidated

accounts comprising:

(a) A consolidated balance sheet dealing with the state of affairs of the company and all the

subsidiaries to be dealt with in the group;

A consolidated profit and loss account dealing with the profit or loss of the company and those

subsidiaries.

However, the group accounts need not be prepared in this form if the directors are of the view

that they could be prepared in another form.

Contents

By s. 152 (1), the group accounts laid before a company shall give a true and fair view of the state

of affairs and profit or loss of the company and the subsidiaries dealt with thereby as a whole, so

far as concerns members of the company.

S. 153 (1) further provides that the group accounts, if prepared as consolidated accounts, shall

comply with the requirements of the Sixth Schedule to the Act, so far as applicable thereto, and if

not so prepared, shall give the same or equivalent information.

Page 155: Bbm4101 Company Law

155

Financial year

S. 153 (1) provides that a holding company‟s directors shall ensure that, except where in their

opinion there are good reasons against it, the financial year of each of its subsidiaries shall

coincide with the company‟s own financial year.

By S. 153 (2) the Registrar is empowered to postpone the submission of a company‟s accounts to

a general meeting from one calendar year to the next for purposes of enabling the company‟s

financial year to end with that of the holding company.

Directors; report

By s. 157 (1) the balance sheet must have attached to its directors‟ report on the company‟s

affairs, including the amount if any, which they propose to carry to reserves within the meaning

of the Sixth Schedule to the Act.

11.3 Audit of Accounts

A company‟s annual accounts are required to be audited y auditors appointed for the purpose. S.

159 (1) provides that “every company shall at each annual general meeting appoint an auditor or

auditors to hold office from the conclusion of that, until the conclusion of the next, annual general

meeting .”

a) Reappointment

By s. 159 (2) a „retiring auditor‟ shall be deemed to be reappointed without any resolution being

passed unless:

(a) He is not qualified for reappointment; or

(b) A resolution has been passed at that meeting (i.e. annual general meeting) appointing

somebody instead of him or providing expressly that he shall not be appointed;

(c) He has given the company notice in writing of his unwillingness to be reappointed.

b)Appointment by the registrar

Section 159 (3) provides that :where at an annual general meeting no auditors are appointed or are

deemed to be reappointed, the Registrar may appoint a person to fill the vacancy. Section 159 (4)

requires the company, within seven days of the Registrar‟s power to appoint an auditor under s.

159 (3) becoming exercisable, to give him notice of that fact. If the company fails to do so, it and

every officer who is in default shall be liable to a default fine.

Page 156: Bbm4101 Company Law

156

c) First auditors

Section 159 (5) provides that the first auditors of a company may be appointed by the directors at

any time before the first annual general meeting and that the auditors so appointed shall hold

office until the conclusion of that meeting.

In default of appointment of the first auditors by directors the company may do so. Where the

directors have appointed the first auditors, the company may at a general meeting remove such

auditors and appoint in their place any other persons who have been nominated for appointment

by any member of the company. Notice of the nomination to be given to the members at least

fourteen days before the date of the meeting.

d) Remuneration

Section 159 (7) provides that the remuneration payable to an auditor appointed by the directors or

by the Registrar may be fixed by the directors or by the Registrar, as the case may be. In all other

cases the auditor‟s remuneration shall be fixed by the company in general meeting or in such

manner as the company in general meeting may determine. Any sums paid in respect of the

auditor‟s expenses shall be deemed to be included in the expression „remuneration’.

e) Qualifications

Section 161 (1), as amended by s. 46 (2) of the Accountants Act 1977, provides that „a person or

firm shall not be qualified for appointment as auditor of a company unless he, or in the case of a

firm, every partner in the firm, is the holder of a practicing certificated issued pursuant to

section 21 of the Accountants Act 1977”.

f) Disqualification

Section 161 (2) provides that one of the following persons shall be qualified for appointment as

auditor of a company:

(a) An officer or servant of the company;

(b) A person who is a partner of or in the employment of an officer or servant of the company

(unless the company is a private company);

(c) A body corporate; and

(d) Persons who are disqualified for appointment as auditor of the company‟s subsidiary or

holding company or subsidiary of the company‟s holding company.

Page 157: Bbm4101 Company Law

157

g) Improper appointment

S. 161 provides that if any unqualified person is appointed as auditor, the person appointed, the

company and every officer in default, shall be liable to a fine not exceeding four thousand

shillings.

h) Removal

Although the marginal note section 160 (1) bears the word “provisions as to resolutions relating

to appointment and removal of auditors” there is no provision in the section for removal of

auditors. It only provides that “special notice shall be required for a resolution at the company‟s

annual general meeting appointing as auditor a person other than a retiring auditor or providing

expressly that a retiring auditor shall not be reappointed.”

A special notice is defined by section 142 generally for all provisions of the Act as not less than

twenty-eight days notice. On receipt of the proposed resolution the company shall forthwith send

a copy thereof to the retiring auditor (id any). If the auditor makes written representations which

do not exceed a reasonable length and requests their notification to members of the company, the

company shall:

(a) In any notice of the resolution given to members of the company state the fact of the

representations having been made, and

(b) Send a copy of the representations to every member of the company to whom notice of the

meeting is sent (whether before of after receipt of the representations by the company).

If a copy of the representations is not sent as provided because the representations were received

too late or because of the company‟s default the auditor may (without prejudice to his right to be

heard orally) require that the representations shall be read out at the meeting. None of these

provisions applies if, on application of either of the company or any other person who claims to

be aggrieved, the High Court holds the representations to be defamatory.

The duty of the auditors is spelt out in section 162 (1) which provides:

“The auditors shall make a report to the members on the accounts examined by

them, and on every balance sheet, every profit and loss account and on the group

accounts laid before the company in general meeting during their tenure of office.

Page 158: Bbm4101 Company Law

158

The auditors report shall be read before the company in general meeting and shall open to

inspection by any member

i)Contents of the auditors report

By section 162 (1) the auditors report must contain statements as to the matters mentioned in the

seventh schedule of the Act.

The matters are:

1. Whether they have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of their

knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of their audit.

2. Whether, in their opinion, proper books of account have been kept by the company, so far as

appears from their examination of those books, and proper returns adequate for the purposes

of their audit have been received from branches not visited by them

3. (a) Whether the company‟s balance sheet and (unless it is framed as a consolidated profit

and loss account) profit and loss account dealt with by the report are in agreement with

the books of account and returns.

(b) Whether, in their opinion and to the best of their information and according to the

explanations given them, the said accounts give the information required by the Act in

the manner so required and give a true and fair view-

(i) In the case of the balance sheet, of the state of the company‟s affairs as at the end

of its financial year; and

(ii) In the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit or loss for its financial year

or, as the case may be give a true and fair view thereof subject to the non-

disclosure of any matters (to be indicated in the report) which by virtue of Part III

of the Sixth Schedule to the Act are not required to be disclosed.

4. In the case of a holding company submitting group accounts whether in their opinion, the

group accounts have been properly prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Act so

as to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs and profit or loss of the company and its

subsidiaries dealt with thereby, so far as concerns members of the company, or as the case

may be, so as to give a true and fair view thereof subject to the non-disclosure of any matters

(to be indicated in their report) which by virtue of Part III of the Sixth Schedule to the Act are

not required to be disclosed.

Page 159: Bbm4101 Company Law

159

j) Power of auditors

Under s. 162 (3) every auditor of a company has a right of access at all times to the books and

accounts and vouchers of the company. He has also a right under the section to call n officers of

the company for any information and explanation as he thinks necessary for the performance of

his duties.

Under section 162 (4) he is entitled to attend any general meeting of the company. He is also

entitled to receive all notices and communications relating to any general meeting which any

member of the company is entitled to be heard at any general meeting which he attends on any

part of the business of the meeting which concerns him as auditor.

Summary for the topic

Requirements of what should be captured by the books of account

The various financial statements that should be presented to the shareholders

The manner of presentation of group accounts to the shareholders

In the manner of appointment ,remuneration and disqualification of the auditors

Page 160: Bbm4101 Company Law

160

Revision Questions

a) Explain requirements of what should be captured by the Books of Account

b) Explain the various financial statements that should be presented to the shareholders

c) Explain the manner of presentation of group accounts to the shareholders

d) Explain the manner of appointment ,remuneration and disqualification of the auditors

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 231-

234

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 260-282

Oliver.M,Marshal E.A,Company Law Pitman Publishing London UK Pages 354-370

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK

Pages446-458

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law, Reed Elsevier(UK) Limited, London UK Pages 221-

286,382-394

Page 161: Bbm4101 Company Law

161

LESSON 12: INVESTIGATION OF A COMPANY’S AFFAIRS

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Explain the process of Investigation Into a Company’s Affairs

b) Explain the process of Investigation of Company’s membership

c) Explain the Alternative power of Registrar in matters of company investigation

12.1 Investigation Into a Company’s Affairs

An investigation by the Registrar of Companies into a company‟s affairs may arise in the

following ways under section 164 of the Act:

(a) Where the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe that the provisions of the Act are not

being complies with by the company, or

(b) Where, on perusal of any document which the company is required to submit to him under

the provisions of the Act, he is of the opinion that the document does not disclose a full and

fair statement of the matters to which it purports to relate.

The Registrar initiates his investigation by calling on the company, by written order, to produce

all or any of the books of the company, or to furnish in writing any specified information or

explanation. The books must be produced, and the information or explanation furnished, within

the time specified in the order.

Subsection 4 provides that, if after examination of the books produced and the explanation

furnished y the company, the Registrar is of the opinion that an unsatisfactory state of affairs is

disclosed or that, a full and fair statement has not been disclosed, he shall report the

circumstances of the case in writing to the High Court.

a) Appointment of inspectors

Section 166 empowers the High Court to appoint one or more competent inspectors to investigate

the affairs of the company if it appears to the court upon the report from the Registrar that there

are circumstances suggesting:

(a) That the company‟s business is being conducted with intent to defraud its creditors or the

creditors of any other person or otherwise for a fraudulent or unlawful purpose or in a manner

Page 162: Bbm4101 Company Law

162

oppressive of any part of its members or that it was formed for any fraudulent or unlawful

purpose; or

(b) That persons concerned with its formation or the management of its affairs have in connexion

therewith been guilty of fraud, misfeasance or other misconduct towards its members; or

(c) That its members have not been given all the information with respect to its affairs which

they might reasonably expect; or

(d) That it is desirable so to do.

b) Appointment of inspectors on application of members

Section 165 gives additional powers to the High Court to appoint inspectors –

(a) In the case of a company having a share capital, on the application either of not less than two

hundred members or of members holding not less than one-tenth of the shares issued; and

(b) In the case of a company not having a share capital, on the application of not less than one-

fifth in number of the person‟s on the company‟s register of members.

Subsection (2) requires the application to be supported by such evidence as the court may require

for the purpose of showing that the applicants have good reason for requiring the investigation. In

addition, the court may, before appointing an Inspector, require the applicants to give security, to

an amount not exceeding ten thousand shillings, for payment of the costs of the investigation.

c) Scope of investigation

The inspector appointed by the court is to investigate „the affairs‟ of the company. This phrase

has no specific meaning and has not been defined by the Ac. In the English case of R v Board of

Trade, ex parte St. Martin’s Preserving Co. Ltd (1965) it was explained, in relation to the

equivalent provisions of the English Companies Act 1948, that the words „affairs of the company‟

include matters which relate to a company‟s shareholding in its subsidiary and control of its

subsidiary as well as the conduct of a company’s affairs by a receiver and manager appointed

by the debenture-holder. This explains the reason why section 167 empowers the inspector to

investigate also the affairs of any other body corporate which is or has at any relevant time

been the company’s subsidiary or holding company, or a subsidiary or its holding company,

or a holding company of its subsidiary.

d) Powers of inspector

Section 168 gives to the inspector the following powers:

Page 163: Bbm4101 Company Law

163

(a) To require any officer or agent of the company to produce all books and documents of, or

relating to, the company or any other body corporate whose affairs are also being investigated

by the inspector which are in his custody or power.

(b) To acquire any officer or agent of the company being investigated to give all assistance in

connection with the investigation which he is reasonably able to give.

(c) To examine on oath any officer or agent of the company being investigated and to administer

the oath accordingly.

(d) To ask the High Court to examine on oath any person whom he cannot so examine.

Any officer or agent who refuses to produce the books or documents required by the inspector or

refuses to answer any question which is put to him by the inspector is liable to be punished by the

High Court as if he had been guilty of contempt of the court.

Subsection 5 of Section 168 provides than any reference to „officers‟ or to „agents‟ of a company

includes past, as well as present officers, agents and the bankers, advocates and auditors of the

company.

e) The inspector‘s reports

Section 169(1) provides that an inspector may, and, if so directed by the High Court,

shall, makes interim reports to the court, and on the conclusion of the investigation shall

make a final report to the court. The report shall be written and, if the court so directs,

printed.

The court shall-

a) Forward a copy of any report made by an inspector to the company and to the

Registrar;

b) If the courts thinks fit, forward a copy thereof on request and on payment of the

prescribed fee, to any person who is a member of the company or of any other

body corporate dealt with in the report, or whose interests as a creditor of the

company or any such other body corporate appear to the court to be affected; and

c) Where the inspector is appointed under section 165, furnished, at the request of the

applicants for the investigation, a copy to them.

Page 164: Bbm4101 Company Law

164

The Court may also cause the report to be printed and published

Under Section four 172, a copy of the inspector‟s report which is authenticated by the

seal of the company whose affairs have been investigated shall be admissible in any

legal proceedings as evidence of the opinion of the inspector in relation to any matter

contained in the report.

f) Proceeding on inspector’s reports

Section 170 provides that if, from the Inspector‟s report:

It appears to the court that any person has, in relation to the company or to any other

body corporate whose affairs have been investigated, been guilty of any offence for which

he is criminally liable, the court shall forward a copy of the report to the attorney –

General who shall institute proceeding if he considered that the case is one in which a

prosecution ought to be instituted (in which event all officers and agents of the company,

past the present, except the defendant in the proceeding , shall give to him all assistance in

connection with the prosecution which they are reasonably able to give);

It appears to the attorney general, in the case of any body corporate liable to be would up

under the Act, that it is expedient to wind it up because:

the company‟s business is being conducted with intent to defraud creditors or for a

fraudulent or unlawful purpose or in a manner oppressive of any part of its members, or

the person concerned with its formation or the management of its affairs have in

connection therewith been guilty of fraud, misfeasance or other misconduct towards it or

towards its members, the attorney general shall , unless the body corporate is already

being wound up by the court, present a petition for it to be wound up if the court thinks

it is just and equitable that it should be wound up or a petition for an order under section

211 of the Act, or both;

it appears to the attorney general that civil proceeding ought in the public interest to be

brought by any body corporate dealt with by the report for the recovery of damages in

respect of any fraud, misfeasance or other misconduct in connection with the promotion or

formation of the body corporate or the management of its affairs , or for the recovery of

any property of the body corporate which has been misapplied or wrongfully retained , the

attorney -general may himself bring proceedings for the purpose in the name of the body

Page 165: Bbm4101 Company Law

165

corporate(in which event the Registrar shall indemnify the body corporate against any cost

or expenses incurred by it in or in connection with the proceedings)

g) Expenses of investigation

Sectiion171 (1) provides that the expenses of and incidental to an investigation by an

inspector appointed by the court are to be defrayed in the first instance by the registrar, but

the following persons shall, to the extent mentioned, be liable to repay the Registrar

any person who is convicted on a prosecution instituted by the attorney general as a

result of investigation, or who is ordered to pay damages or restore any property in

proceedings brought by the Attorney –General as a result of the inspector‟s report, may in

the same proceedings be ordered to pay such expenses to such extent as may be specified in

the order;

any body corporate in whose name proceeding are brought as a result of inspector‟s

report is liable to repay to the amount or value of any sums of property recovered by it as a

result of those proceedings (in which case the amount payable shall be a first charge on

the sums or property recovered

any body corporate dealt with by the inspector „s report, where the inspectors was not

appointed by the court on its own motion, is liable, except so far as the court otherwise

directs( unless as a result of the investigation a prosecution is instituted by the Attorney –

General); and

the applicants for the investigation( where the inspector was appointed as a result of an

application made by the company‟s members) are liable to such extent (if any) as the court

direct.

12.2 Investigation of Company’s membership

a) Appointment of inspectors

Section 173(1) provides that where it appears to the Registrar that there are good

reasons so to do, he may appoint one or more competent inspectors to investigate and

report on the membership of any company, or otherwise, for the purpose of determining

the true persons who are or have been financially interested in the success or failure

Page 166: Bbm4101 Company Law

166

(real or apparent) of the company or able to control or materially to influence the policy

of the company

Section 173(2) provides that the appointment may define the scope of the inspector‟s

investigation, whether as respects the matter or the period to which it is extended or

otherwise, and, in particular, may limit the investigation to matters connected with

particular shares or debentures.

b) Inspector’s powers

Section 173(4) provides that, subject to the terms of an inspector‟s appointment, his

powers shall extend to the investigation of any circumstances suggesting the existence

of an arrangement or understanding which, though not legally binding, is or was

observed or likely to be observed in practice and which is relevant for purposes‟ of his

investigation Section173(5) further confers on the inspector the same powers as those

conferred on an inspector appointed to investigate a company‟s affairs.

Section 173(6) provides that the expenses of investigation shall be defrayed by the

Registrar.

12.3 Alternative power of Registrar

Section174(1) provides that, where it appears to the Registrar that there is good reason to

investigate the ownership of any shares in or debentures of a company and that it is

unnecessary to appoint an inspector for the purpose, he may require any person whom

he has reasonable cause to believe-

a) to be or to have been interested in those shares or debentures; or

b) to act or to have acted in relation to those shares or debentures as the advocate or

agent of someone interested therein,

to give him any information which he has or reasonably be expected to obtain as to the

present and past interests in those shares or debentures. The names and addresses of the

said persons and of any persons who act or have acted on their behalf in relation to the

shares or debentures must also be given.

Section 174(2) provides that, for the purpose of Section 174, a person shall be

deemed to have an interest in a share or debenture if he has any right to acquire or dispose

Page 167: Bbm4101 Company Law

167

of the share or debenture, or any interest therein, or to vote in respect thereof, or if his

consent is necessary for the exercise of any of the rights of other persons interested therein,

or if other persons interested therein can be required or accustomed to exercise their rights

in accordance with his instructions.

Summary for the topic

Explain the process of investigation into a company‟s affairs

Explain the process of investigation of company‟s membership

Explain the alternative power of registrar in matters of company investigation

Page 168: Bbm4101 Company Law

168

Revision Questions

a) Explain the process of Investigation Into a Company’s Affairs

b) Explain the process of Investigation of Company’s membership

c) Explain the Alternative power of Registrar in matters of company investigation

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 245-

249

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi, Kenya.

Pages 283-287

Oliver.M,Marshal E.A,Company Law Pitman Publishing London UK Pages 404-414

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK

Pages 458-462

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law, Reed Elsevier(UK) Limited, London UK Pages 431-

458

Page 169: Bbm4101 Company Law

169

LESSON 13: WINDING-UP

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) Explain the meaning of winding up

b) Explain the process of winding up by the court

c) Explain the process of voluntary winding up

d) Explain the process of creditors’ voluntary winding up

e) Explain the process of winding up subject to supervision

13.1 meaning of winding up

‘Winding up’ is the legal process by which a company‟s legal existence is brought to an

end. It is carried though by a person known as liquidator who liquidates the company

(i.e. „kills‟ it and then makes the necessary arrangements for its burial).The „burial

arrangements‟ entail, inter alia

a) Setting the list of contributories;

b) Collecting the company‟s assets

c) Paying the company‟s debts and other liabilities, and

d) Distributing the surplus assets (if any) among the contributories

Section 212 provides that the winding up may be either

a) a compulsory winding up by the court; or

b) a voluntary winding up, which may be either a member’s voluntary

winding up, or a creditors’ voluntary winding up; or

c) a winding up subject to the supervision of the high court.

13.2 Modes of winding up

13.2.1 Winding up by the court

Page 170: Bbm4101 Company Law

170

A winding up by the court commences when a petition is presented to the High court

under s.218 of the Companies Act. The petition will specify one of the seven grounds

for compulsory winding up and be presented (usually) either by a creditor or by a

member (now called a „contributory‟) of the company.

The seven grounds for winding up by the court are listed in s. 219 as follows-

a) the company has by special resolution resolved that it should be wound up by

the court;

b) the company does not deliver the statutory report to the Registrar or defaults in

holding the statutory meetings;

c) the company has not commenced its business within a year from its incorporation

or has suspended its business for a whole year;

d) the company is unable to pay its debts( as defined in section 220;

e) the number of members of the company has reduced, in the case of a private

company, below, two , or, in the case of a public company, below seven;

f) the court considers that it is just and equitable to wind up the company, and

g) in the case of a company incorporated outside Kenya and carrying on business in

Kenya, liquidation proceedings have been commenced in respect of it in the

country of its incorporation or in which it has established a place of business.

Inability to pay debts

By section 220, a company shall be deemed to be unable to pay its debts:

a) if a creditor (or creditors) to whom the company owes more than one thousand

shillings serves on the company at its registered office a written demand for

payment and the company neglects , within the ensuing three weeks, either to pay

the debt or to offer satisfactory security for it;

b) if execution or other process issued on a judgment, decree or order of any court

in favor of a creditor of the company is returned unsatisfied in whole or in part; or

c) If it is proved to the satisfaction of the court that, taking account of the contingent

and prospective liabilities of the company, it is unable to pay its debt.

Although no minimum amount is specified for (b) or(c) it is assumed that the

one thousand shillings minimum applies.

Page 171: Bbm4101 Company Law

171

Regarding winding up on the just and equitable ground, it should be noted that

this will be done only if the court is of the opinion that the company should be so

wound up. This gives the court a discretionary power which is extremely wide and

those exercises cannot be challenged. However, the just and equitable ground is

usually relied on by a member (contributory) who is dissatisfied with, or is at

loggerheads with, the directors or controlling shareholders over the management

of the company. Winding up orders on the just and equitable ground have been made

in situations where:

(a) The substratum of the company has gone .What is generally called lose of

substrum occurred in Re: German Date Coffee Co. (1882) in which the object clause

specified with much particularity that the sole object of the company was to

manufacture coffee from dates under a German patent. The German government

refused to grant a patent. The company however manufactured coffee under a Swedish

patent for a sale in German. A contributory petitioned for compulsory winding up but

the petition was opposed by the other members of the company. It was held that the

company had been formed only to work a particular patent and, as it could not do so, it

should be would up. However, the case of Re: Kitson $ (1946) established the

principle that, if there is an alternative object which the company can carry on, it will

not be wound up on the just and equitable ground.

(b) There is a complete deadlock in the management of the company’s affairs

The kind of deadlock that is required for this purpose is typified by the case of Re:

Yenidje Tobacco Co. (1946) in which two sole traders had converted their business

into a company of which they were the only directors and shareholders. The quarreled

bitterly and one sued the other for fraud. Meanwhile they refused to speak to each other

and conducted board meetings by passing notes though the hands of the secretary. The

defendant in the fraud action petitioned for compulsory winding up, which was opposed

by the other member. It was held that, in substance, the two members were really

partners and, by analogy with the law of partnership, it was just and equitable to order

liquidation since any prospect of friendly co-operation that sustains a partnership had

been destroyed by their animosity towards each other.

Page 172: Bbm4101 Company Law

172

In Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries(1973) , E and N had carried on business together

for twenty five years , originally as a partners , and for the last ten years through a

company, in which each originally had five hundred shares. E and N were the first

directors and shared the profit as directors‟ remuneration and no dividends were

paid to them . When N‟s son joined the business, he became a third director and E and

N each transferred one hundred shares to him eventually there were disputes and N and

his son used their voting control in general meeting to remove E from his directorship

under the power of removal given by Companies Act 1948 s. 184 (in Kenya, s. 185). E

sued to have company wound up on the ground that it was just and equitable to do so.

It was held that the company should be wound up. Although N and his son had acted

within their legal rights when they voted for the removal of E, they had acted in an

unjust or inequitable manner.

Petitions

A petition for the winding up of a company by the High Court may be presented by:

(a) The company itself after the members have passed a special resolution that the

company be wound up by the court;

(b) A creditor or creditors ; or

(c) A contributory or contributories; or

(d) The Official Receiver (who, under s.221(2), can present a petition even after the

commencement of a voluntary winding up); or

(e) The Attorney-General (following an investigation into the company‟s affairs).

For the purpose of (b) above, a creditor includes:

(i)Any person to whom a sum of money is due and payable by the company, including

assignees of a debt, or part of a debt;

(ii) The personal representative of a deceased creditor; or

A contingent or prospective creditor

For the purpose of (c) above, a contributory is defined by s.214 as‟ every person liable to

contribute to the assets of a company in the event of its being wound up,‟ including

Page 173: Bbm4101 Company Law

173

any person alleged to be a contributory. Such a person is usually a member of the

company (irrespective of whether his shares are fully paid up).

Section 221(1) provides that a contributory shall not be entitled to present a winding –up

petition unless.

(a) the number of members is reduced below the prescribed limit; or

(b) the shares in respect of which he is contributory, or some of them, were originally

allotted to him; or

(c) he has held the shares in respect of which he is contributory, for at least six

months out of the last eighteen months;

(d) the shares have devolved on him though the death of a former holder.

Procedure on winding up by the High Court

The procedure on winding up a company by the High Court is governed by the

Companies (Winding-up) Rules and, briefly, is as follows:

1. Presentation of petition

Rule 21 provides that every petition shall be in Form No3, 4, or 5(in the schedule to the

Rules), but with such variation as circumstances may require.

The following information is to be entered in the form:

(a) the months of the company‟s incorporation;

(b) the situation of the registered office of the company;

(c) the registered postal address of the company;

(d) the nominal capital of the company, the shares into which it is divided and the

amount paid or credited as paid up;

(e) the objects for which the company was established, and

(f) the facts on which the petitioner relied on for making the application.

Under Rule 22, the petition must be presented at the office of the Registrar of Companies

who shall appoint the time and place at which the petition is to be heard. The time and

place so fixed are to be written on the petition and all sealed copies of it.

Page 174: Bbm4101 Company Law

174

Rule 23 provides that every petition shall be advertised for at least seven days before

the hearing, once in Kenya Gazette, and once at least in one newspaper circulating in the

area of the company‟s registered office or principal or last known principal place of business.

The advertisement must state the date on which the petition was presented and the name and

address of the petitioner and of his advocate and must contain a note at the foot thereof stating

that any person who intends to appear at the hearing of the petition must send notice of his

intention to the petitioner, or to his advocate, vide Form No. 13 in the schedule to the

companies (Winding –up) Rules. Rule29 (2) provides that any person who fails to give notice

of his intention as prescribed shall not without special leave of the court, be allowed to appear

on the hearing of the petition.

By Rule 25, every petition must be verified by an affidavit in Form No. 10 sworn by the

petitioner or, if there is more than one petitioner, by one of the petitioners. Where the petition is

presented by a corporation, the affidavit shall be in Form No. 11 and shall be sworn by a

director, secretary or other principal officer of the corporation, and filed within four days after

the presentation thereof.

By Rule 24, every petition shall, unless presented by the company, be served upon the company

at its registered office, if any, and, if there is no registered office, at the principal or last known

principal place of business. Where the company is being wound up voluntarily a copy of the

petition must also be served upon the liquidator.

In Charles Forte Investments Ltd v Amanda (1964) it was explained that the court had

inherent power to restrain the presentation of a petition if it is of the opinion that the

presentation is vexatious or an abuse of the court. The court would also refuse to make an order

for winding up if the petitioner fails to show strong grounds as to why the company should be

wound up : Re: Davis Investment(East Ham) Ltd .

Section226 (2) of the Act provides that the winding up of a company by the court shall be deemed

to commence at the time of presentation of the petition for the winding up by the court.

This would not however be the case where, before the presentation, a resolution had been

passed by the company for voluntary winding up. In such a case the winding up shall be

deemed to have commenced at the time of the passing of the resolution.

2. Appointment of provisional liquidator

Page 175: Bbm4101 Company Law

175

Section 235 empowers the High Court to appoint the official Receiver to be the liquidator

provisionally at any time after the presentation of a winding up petition and before the

making of a winding up order. By section 230, the „official receiver‟ means the official

receiver attached to the High Court for bankruptcy purposes. The court is however empowered

by s. 231 to appoint some other officer to be the official Receiver, and hence the interim

liquidator, if by doing so a more convenient and economical conduct of winding up wound be

secured. The powers of the interim liquidator under the Act may be limited and restricted to any

extent by the court order appointing him.

3. Liquidator

Section 236(b) provides that, on a winding up order being made, the Official Receiver summon

separate meetings of the directors and contributories of the company for the purpose of

determining whether or not an application is to be made to the High Court for appointing a

liquidator in the place of the Official Receiver. It shall however not be necessary to summon a

meeting of contributories where the court has dispensed with the settlement of a list of

contributories. If there is a disagreement between the creditors and contributories as to who

should be appointed liquidator, the court shall decide the difference and make such order

thereon as it may think fit. If the court does not appoint a liquidator, the Official receiver shall

be a liquidator of the company. He shall also, by virtue of his office, be the liquidator during

any vacancy in the office of the liquidator. While discharging the duties of the office of

liquidator the official receiver shall be known as ‘the official receiver and liquidator.’ Any

other person appointed liquidator shall be known as „the liquidator.‟

4. Special Manager

Section 258(1) empowers the Official Receiver to apply to the court for the appointment of a

special manager where he is satisfied that the nature of the estate or business of the company,

or the interests of the creditors or contributories generally require the appointment of the special

manager. The court may then appoint the manager to act during such time as the court may

direct. By s.258 (2), the special manager shall give such security and account in such manner

as the Official Receiver shall direct.

Rule 40 of the Companies (Winding up) Rules provides that every special manager shall account

to the Official Receiver and the special manager’s accounts shall be verified by affidavit and

Page 176: Bbm4101 Company Law

176

when approved by the Official Receiver, to totals of the receipts and payment shall be added by

the Official Receiver to his accounts.

Section 258(3) provides that the special manager shall receive such remuneration as may be fixed

by the court. Under Rule 39(2), the remuneration shall, unless the court in any case otherwise

directs, be stated in the order appointing him. The court is empowered at any subsequent time,

for good cause, to make an order for payment of further remuneration.

5. Hearing of petition

Section 222(1) provides that on hearing of a winding-up petition the High Court may

(a) Dismiss the petition; or

(b) Adjourn the hearing conditionally or unconditionally; or

(c) Make an interim order, or

(d) Make any other order it thinks fit.

However, the court cannot refuse to make a winding –up order on the ground only that the assets

of the company have been mortgaged to an amount equal or in excess of their value, or that the

company has no assets.

By section 222(2), where the petition is presented by members of the company as contributories

on the ground that it is just and equitable that the company should be wound up, the court shall

make a winding up order if it is of the opinion:

(i) That the petitioners are entitled to relief either by winding-up the company or by some

other means, and

(ii) That in the absence of any other remedy it would be just and equitable that the company

should be wound up.

However, the court needs not make an order if it is also of the opinion that some other remedy is

available to the petitioners and that they are acting unreasonably in seeking to have the

company wound up instead of pursuing the alternative remedy.

Where the petition is presented on the ground of default in delivering the statutory report to the

registrar or in holding the statutory meeting the court may:

(a) Instead of making a winding-up order, direct that the statutory report shall be delivered or that

shall be held, and

Page 177: Bbm4101 Company Law

177

(b) Order the costs to be paid by any persons who in the opinion of the court are responsible for

the default.

6. Winding-up order

Rule 37 provides that when an order that a company be wound up has been made:

(a) Three sealed copies of the order shall forthwith be sent by the Registrar of the High

Court to the Official Receiver.

(b) The Official Receiver shall serve upon the company by post one sealed copy of the order

and shall forthwith cause the order to be inserted in the Kenya Gazette. The fact of the order

having been made shall also be advertised in a newspaper circulating in Kenya

7. Effect of a winding-up order

The effect of the order is as follows

(a) The Official Receiver becomes provisional liquidator and takes possession and control of

the assets of the company;

(b) The liquidation is deemed to have begun at the time when the petition was first presented;

(c) All the power of the directors cease;

(d) any disposition of the company‟s property and transfer of its shares subsequent to the

commencement of liquidation is void unless the court orders otherwise:s.224;

(e) any legal proceedings in progress against the company are halted ( and non may

thereafter begin) unless the court gives leave;

(f) any attachment of the company‟s assets after commencement of liquidation is void;

(g) all employees of the company are automatically dismissed.

8. Statement of affairs

By s. 232, within fourteen days of the making of the order for winding up, a statement of affairs

must be delivered to the Official Receiver verified by one or more directors and by the

secretary. The statement shall be in form no.21, verified by an affidavit and must show

particulars of the company‟s assets and liabilities and a list of all creditors with particulars of

any security which creditors may hold.

The Official Receiver may require any of the following persons to join in submitting the

statement of affairs:

(a) present or past officers of the company;

Page 178: Bbm4101 Company Law

178

(b) employees who are or who have been in the service of the company within the previous

year if the official receiver is of the opinion that they can provide the formation required;

(c) persons who have taken part in the formation of the company within the previous year,

(d) the receivers or managers of the whole or substantially the whole of the company‟s

property.

The Official Receiver then makes a preliminary report to the court on the causes of the

company‟s failure and states whether in his opinion he should make further investigation and

report on suspected fraud. If he does so, this may lead on to the public examination in open

court of those believed to be implicated.

The Official Receiver is also empowered to call separate meetings of creditors and of

contributories within one month of the order for liquidation. Each meeting may nominate a

liquidator to replace the Official Receiver and also representatives to serve as members of a

committee of inspection (to work with the liquidator). The Official Receiver reports to the court

which may appoint a liquidator and a committee of inspection. If no other liquidator is

appointed (or if the post falls vacant) the Official Receiver continues to act as liquidator. A

liquidator must be an individual and may not be an undischarged bankrupt.

Notice of the order for compulsory liquidation and of the appointment of a liquidator is given to

the Registrar and in the Kenya Gazette. When the liquidator completes his task he reports to the

court, which examines his accounts, and makes an order for dissolution of the company. The

order is sent to the Registrar who gives notice of it in the Kenya Gazette and dissolves the

company.

If while the liquidation is in progress the liquidator decides to call meeting of contributories

or creditors, he may arrange to do so under the powers vested in the court

13.2.2 Voluntary Winding up

Section 271 (1) provides that a company may be wound up voluntarily:

a) When period, if any, fixed for the duration of the company by the articles expires,

or the events, if any, occurs, on the occurrence of which the article provides that

the company is to be dissolved, and company in general meeting has passed a

resolution requiring the company to be wound up voluntarily; or

b) If the company resolves by special resolution that the company be wound up

voluntarily. Section272(1) provides that when a company has passed a resolution

Page 179: Bbm4101 Company Law

179

for voluntary winding up, it shall within fourteen days after the passing of the

resolution, give notice of the resolution by advertisement in the Kenya Gazette,

and also some newspaper circulating in Kenya.

The Under Section 273, the winding up commences at the time of the passing of

resolution for winding up.

a) Declaration of Solvency

A voluntary winding up is a members’ voluntary winding up only if the directors make

and deliver to the registrar a declaration of solvency. The declaration is a statutory

declaration that the directors have made a full inquiry in to the affairs of the company and

are of the opinion that it will be able to pay its debts in full within a specified period, not

exceeding twelve months.

The declaration is made by all the directors or, if there are more than two directors, by a

majority of them. It must be in the form No. 27 and must include a statement of the

company‟s assets and liabilities as at the latest practicable date before the declaration is

made.

Under Section 27(2) the declaration shall have no effect unless it is made within the thirty

days immediately preceding the date of the passing of the resolution for winding up the

company and is delivered to the Register for registration before that date.

It is a criminal offence punishable by fine or imprisonment for a director to make a

declaration of solvency without having reasonable grounds for it.

In a members’ voluntary winding up the creditors play no part in the winding up

since they have been assured that their debts will be paid in full.

There is no committee of inspection on which creditors would be represented. The liquidator shall

also within three months from the end of the year following the commencement of the winding

up, call a general meeting of the company and lay before it an account of his acts and dealings

and of the conduct of the winding up during the preceding year.

Page 180: Bbm4101 Company Law

180

When the liquidation is complete the liquidator calls a meeting to lay before it his final accounts.

After holding the final meeting the liquidator sends a copy of his accounts to the Registrar who

dissolves the company three months later by removing its name from the register.

13.3.3 Creditors’ Voluntary Winding Up

Section 276 (4) provides that winding-up in the case of which no declaration of solvency is made

and delivered to the Registrar is to be known as creditors’ voluntary winding up. This would be

so even if in the end the company pays all its debts in full.

In order to commence as creditors‟ voluntary winding up, the directors must convene a general

meeting of members to pass a special resolution for voluntary winding up. They also convene a

meeting of creditors by sending notices by post to creditors individually and advertising the

meeting once in the Kenya Gazette and once at least in a newspaper circulating in Kenya.

The meeting of members is held first and its primary duty is;

(a) To pass the resolution for winding up the company:

(b) To appoint a liquidator; and

(c) To nominate representatives to the committee of inspection .

The creditors‟ meeting is convened for the same day as a later time than the members‟ meeting or

it is held the following day. Section 286 (3) provides that the directors of the company shall:

(a) Cause a full statement of the position of the company‟s affairs together with a list of the

creditors of the company and the estimated amount of their claims to be laid before the

meeting of the creditors; and

(b) Appoint one of their numbers to preside at the said meeting.

The creditors‟ meeting nominates a liquidator and up to five representatives of creditors to be

members of the committee of inspection. If the creditors nominate a different person to be

liquidator their choice prevails over the nomination by the members (subject to a right of appeal

to the court).

The main differences between a members’ and creditors’ voluntary winding up are that:

Page 181: Bbm4101 Company Law

181

(a) In a creditors‟ voluntary winding up the liquidator, although responsible to members as well

as creditors, is selected by the creditors whereas in a members‟ voluntary winding up he is

appointed by the members;

(b) In a creditors‟ voluntary winding up the liquidator must obtain the approval (usually) of the

committee of inspection for the exercise of certain statutory powers whereas in a members‟

voluntary winding up he obtains approval from the members in a general meeting‟

(c) There is a committee of inspection in a creditors‟ voluntary winding up with up to five

members, a majority of whom are appointed by the creditors whereas there is no committee

in a members‟ voluntary winding up.

12.3.4 Winding Up Subject to Supervision

Section 304 provides that when a company has passed a resolution for voluntary winding up, the

court may make an order that voluntary winding up shall continue but subject to such supervision

of the court, and with such liberty for creditors, contributors, or others to apply to the court and

generally on such terms and conditions, as the court thinks just.

By section 305, a petition for the continuation of a voluntary winding up subject too the

supervision of the court shall, for the purpose of giving jurisdiction to the court over actions, be

deemed to be a petition for winding up by the court. Where the court makes an order it may

appoint an additional liquidator who shall be subject to the same obligations and stand in the

same position as if he had been appointed under an order for voluntary winding up.

Effect of supervision

Section 308 (1) provides that where an order is made for winding up subject to supervision the

liquidator may, subject to any restrictions imposed by the court, exercise all his powers, without

the sanction or intervention of the court, in the same manner as if the company were being wound

up voluntarily.

Defunct companies

Section 339 (i) provides that where the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe that a company

is not carrying on business or in operation, he may send to the company by post a letter inquiring

whether the company is carrying on business or in operation.

Page 182: Bbm4101 Company Law

182

Section 339 (2) further provides that if the Registrar does not within thirty days of the sending of

the letter receive an answer thereto, he shall within fourteen days after the expiration of the said

period of thirty days send to the company by registered post a letter referring to the first letter,

and stating that no answer thereto has been received, and that if an answer is not received to the

second letter within thirty days from the date thereof, a notice will be published in the Kenya

Gazette with a view to striking the name of the company off the register.

By s. 339 (3), if the Registrar either receives an answer to the effect that the company is not

carrying on business in operation, or does not within thirty days after sending the second letter

receice any answer, he may publish in the Kenya Gazette, and send to the company by post a

notice that at the expiration of three months from the date of the notice the name of the company

mentioned therein will, unless cause is shown to the contrary, be struck off the register and the

company will be dissolved. No letter need however be sent to the company where the company

itself or any director or the secretary of the company has requested the Registrar to strike the

company off the register or has notified him that the company is not carrying on business.

The powers conferred on the Registrar by Section 339 (3) in relation to defunct companies is also

extended to companies which are in the process of being wound up. The power becomes

exercisable if the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe either that no liquidator is acting, or

that the affairs of the company are fully wound up, and that the return required to be made by the

liquidator have not been made for a period of six consecutive months. He then publishes it in the

Kenya Gazette and sends to the company or the liquidator, if any, a notice that at the expiration of

three months from the date of the notice the name of the company will, unless cause is shown to

the contrary, be struck off the register and the company be dissolved.

By section 339 (5), at the expiration of the time mentioned in the notice the Registrar may, unless

cause to the contrary is previously shown by the company, or the liquidator, strike the name of

the company off the register and then publish notice thereof in the Kenya Gazette. The company

shall be dissolved on the publication of the notice in the Gazette. However, the liability, if any, of

every director, officer and member of the company shall continue and may be enforced as if the

company had not been dissolved. The power of the High Court to wind up a company whose

name has been struck off the register shall not be affected by the company‟s dissolution.

Page 183: Bbm4101 Company Law

183

By s. 339 (6) if the company or any member or creditor of the company feels aggrieved by the

company having been struck off the register, the High Court may, on application made before the

expiration of ten years from the publication of the notice of dissolution in the Gazette, order the

name of the company to be restored to the Register of Companies. This could be done only if the

court if satisfied that:

(a) The company, at the time or sticking off, was carrying on business or in operation, or

(b) It is just that the company be restored to the register.

Section 340 provides that where a company is dissolved, all property and rights whatsoever

vested in or held in trust for the company immediately before its dissolution (but not-including

property held by the company in trust for any other person) shall be deemed to be bona vacantia

and shall belong to the government unless the court orders otherwise.

Summary for the topic

The meaning of winding up

The process of winding up by the court

The process of voluntary winding up

The process of creditors‟ voluntary winding up

The process of winding up subject to supervision

Page 184: Bbm4101 Company Law

184

Revision Questions

a) Explain the meaning of winding up

b) Explain the process of winding up by the court

c) Explain the process of voluntary winding up

d) Explain the process of creditors’ voluntary winding up

e) Explain the process of winding up subject to supervision

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 251-

262

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 300-327

Oliver.M,Marshal E.A,Company Law Pitman Publishing London UK Pages 445-454

Abbot.K, Penddle.N,Wardman.K (2002)Business Law. Continuum London UK

Pages 488-498

Cheeseman.H,R (1998) Business Law, Prentice Hall International, London U.K

Pages 652--658

Marsh,Soulsby (1998)Business Law Stanley Thorns(Publishers)Limited, Cheltenham UK

Pages 135-136

Walmsley,K(2000) Company Law, Reed Elsevier(UK) Limited, London UK Pages 651-

658

Page 185: Bbm4101 Company Law

185

LESSON 14: COMPANIES AND THE STOCK EXCHANGE

Expected Learning outcomes

By the end of this lesson you should be able to:

a) List the reasons for listing in the stock exchange

b) Explain the major benefits of listing at the stock exchange

c) Describe the Nairobi stock exchange market segments

d) List down listing requirements at the Nairobi stock exchange general

eligibility requirements for public offering of shares and listing

e) Explain the responsibilities of a listed institution

f) Describe the role of the capital markets authority

14.1 Reasons for listing in the Stock exchange

Institutions list Securities primarily:

a) To unlock value . Sponsors, Promoters and Venture Capitalists use the

capital markets to exit their investments or share risk.

b) To raise funds for expansion and growth without the interest burden of

funds borrowed from lending institutions.

c) To improve the liquidity of their securities.

d) To increase public awareness about the institution and its products.

14.2 Major benefits of listing

a. Funds for expansion and growth without the interest burden.

b. Provides a market for securities .

c. Greater liquidity of securities.

Page 186: Bbm4101 Company Law

186

d. Improves perception of an institution‟s financial stability and

transparency.

e. Objective valuation of securities by market forces.

f. Greater efficiency due to more rigorous disclosure requirements.

g. Greater public profile and awareness of the institution and its products.

14.3 The Nairobi Stock Exchange market segments

a. The Main Board

b. The Main Investment Market Segment (MIMS);

c. The Alternative Investment Market Segment (AIMS);

d. The Fixed Income Securities Market Segment (FISMS);

e. Futures and Options (FOMS)- to be implemented

f. Soon to be introduced (Distinct from the Main Board):Over the Counter

(OTC) Market Segment

14.4 Listing requirements at the Nairobi Stock Exchange

The Capital Markets (Securities) (Public Offers, Listing and Disclosures) Regulations,

2002, prescribes the eligibility requirements for companies listed under the different

market segments at the NSE. It also provides the continuous reporting and disclosure

requirements of listed companies. The following is a summary of the listing requirements

under the different market segments.61

14.4.1 Main Investment Market Segment (MIMS)

1. Registration of the company under the Companies Act as a public limited company

limited by shares.

2. Minimum authorized, issued and fully paid up share capital of Kshs. 50 million and net

assets of Kshs.100 million before public offering of the shares.

3. Shares to be listed must be freely transferable and not subject to any restrictions on

marketability or pre-emptive rights.

4. The company must have published audited and financial statements in line with

international accounting standards for an accounting period ending not more than

Page 187: Bbm4101 Company Law

187

three months prior to the proposed date of the offer. If more than three months have

lapsed, the company must prepare a set of interim un-audited financial statements for

the period following the end of the financial period as long as the period does not

exceed six months. If the period exceeds six months, the company must carry out an

interim audit for the period, or plan a date of offer immediately following the

completion of the next annual audit. The auditor‟s report unqualified

5. The company should be solvent.

6. The company must not be in breach of any of its loan covenants particularly the

maximum debt capacity at the date of application for listing.

7. For a period of at least two years prior to the date of application, the directors of the

issuer must not have:

a. any proceedings in which he/she was convicted of fraud or any criminal offence, or

be the subject of pending criminal proceedings (for individuals) or any action or

offence within or outside Kenya (for corporate bodies).

b. Been the subject of any ruling of a court or governmental body that permanently or

temporarily prohibits him/her from engaging in any type of business practice or

activity, or acting as an investment adviser or as a director, employee, broker,

dealer of any financial institution.

8. The company must have declared positive profits after tax in at least three of the last

five completed accounting periods to the date of the offer.

9. At least 20% of the shares must be held by not less than 300 shareholders excluding

employees of the company following the public shares offering.

10. If the company is a banking or insurance company, it must obtain a clean certificate

from the relevant regulatory authority.

11. The Capital Markets Authority must approve the company‟s information

memorandum or prospectus.

14.4.2 Alternative investment market segment (AIMS)

1. Registration of the company under the Companies Act as a public limited company

limited by shares.

2. Minimum authorized, issued and fully paid up share capital of Kshs. 10 million and net

assets of Kshs.20 million before the public offering of shares.

Page 188: Bbm4101 Company Law

188

3. Shares to be listed must be freely transferable and not subject to any restrictions on

marketability or pre-emptive rights.

4. The company must not be in breach of any of its loan covenants particularly maximum

debt capacity at the date of application for listing.

5. The company must have at least two non-executive and independent directors.

6. For a period of at least two years prior to the date of application, the directors of the

issuer must not have:

a. any proceedings in which he/she was convicted of fraud or any criminal offence, or be

the subject of pending criminal proceedings (for individuals) or any action or offence

within or outside Kenya (for corporate bodies).

b. Been the subject of any ruling of a court or governmental body that permanently or

temporarily prohibits him/her from acting as an investment adviser or as a director,

employee, broker, dealer of any financial institution or engaging in any type of

business practice or activity.

7. For at least one year prior to the application for listing the company must have suitably

qualified senior management with relevant experience. The management should not

have committed any offence considered inappropriate for the management of a listed

company.

The company should have a minimum of twenty-five investors. After listing, at least 20%

of the paid up capital should be held by not less than twenty-five investors excluding

any holding by employees or family members in a family owned enterprise. No

investor should hold more than 3% of the 20% of paid up capital.

9. The company must ensure that the existing shareholders, related persons or such other

group of controlling shareholders who have influence over the management,

undertake not to sell their shareholding before the expiry of twenty-four months

following the listing.

10. The company must have potential for growth and should have been in existence in the

same line of business for a minimum of two years.

11. A subsidiary whose parent company has a five-year track record may list provided

that the subsidiary has an operating track record of at least one year.

Page 189: Bbm4101 Company Law

189

12. The accounts of the company must be audited and should not be older than four

months prior to the date of offer. The auditor‟s report should be unqualified.

13. The company should be solvent.

14. The company should not use the proceeds of a public issue to redeem any loans

obtained prior to the listing by the directors or shareholders.

15. The company must disclose a clear policy on dividends.

16. A company listed on AIMS may only change to MIMS after satisfying the relevant

listing requirements and after a minimum of one year of listing on the AIMS.

17. The Capital Markets Authority must approve the company‟s information

memorandum or prospectus.

14.4.3 Fixed income securities market segment (FISMS)

Companies intending to list commercial papers or corporate bonds in the FIMS must

satisfy all the requirements under MIMS including the following:

1. The total indebtedness of the issuer, including the new issue of the commercial paper

or the corporate bond shall not exceed 400% of the company‟s net worth as at the

date of the latest balance sheet and as long as the commercial paper or corporate bond

remains outstanding.

2. The ration of funds generated from operations to total debt for the three trading periods

preceding the issue shall be maintained at a weighted average of 40% or more.

3. The directors and senior management of an applicant must have appropriate expertise

and experience for the management of the group‟s business. Details of their expertise

must be disclosed in the application‟s memorandum of information.

4. The directors must be free from any conflict of interest between the duties owed to the

company and their private interest.

5. The consent of the CBK or Commissioner of Insurance is required where there is a

guarantor who is either a bank or insurance company, except where the guarantor is

an offshore bank or insurance company not subject to the regulation of the CBK or

Commissioner of Insurance.

6. The guarantor is required to provide the CMA with a financial capability statement

duly certified by its auditors.

Page 190: Bbm4101 Company Law

190

14.4.4 General eligibility requirements for public offering of shares and listing

a) Transferability of Securities : Securities must be freely transferable and not

subject to any restriction on marketability or pre-emption rights.

b) Undertaking: The Company must undertake to comply with the rules of the

market

c) Voting Shares: Only one class of voting shares which are the shares listed on the

Exchange.

d) Approval: All Companies seeking listing shall have their information memoranda

or prospectuses approved by the Capital Markets Authority.

e) Shares: Only fully paid shares are listed at the Exchange.

f) Dividend Policy: Clear future dividend policy.

g) Solvency and adequacy of working capital: Should not be insolvent.

h) Certificate of Comfort: If the issuer is listed in a securities exchange outside

Kenya or is licensed to operate as a bank or an insurance company the issuer must

obtain a letter of no objection from the relevant regulator.

i) Competence and suitability of directors and management: The issuer must not be

in breach of any of its loan covenants – the maximum debt capacity.

As at the date of application and for a period of 2 years prior, no director shall

have:-

i. Any petition under bankruptcy laws (individuals), winding up

petition (corporates);

ii. Any criminal proceedings, nor be subject to any pending

criminal proceedings, or any offence or such action within or

outside Kenya;

iii. Subject to any ruling of a competent court/Government body

that prohibits temporarily or otherwise from engaging in any

type of business practice or activity

Page 191: Bbm4101 Company Law

191

14.5 Disclosure of periodic financial information

a) Dividends and interest

b) Such payments on issued securities should be notified to the securities exchange,

the Authority and the securities holders immediately upon declaration by means

of a press announcement.

c) The declaration shall be at least 14 days prior to the closing date of the register

and shall contain the following minimum information:

d) The closing date for determination of entitlements;

e) The date on which the dividend or interest will be paid; and

f) The cash amount that will be paid for the dividend or interest.

g) Interim and Preliminary Reports

h) An Issuer shall publish an interim report within 2 months of the end of the interim

period in the financial year and shall notify the Securities Exchange and the

Authority. Where an Issuer has subsidiaries, the said report shall be based on the

group accounts.

i) Annual Financial Statements

j) Every Issuer of securities to the public shall prepare an annual report containing

audited annual financial statements within 4 months of the close of its financial

year. A complete set of financial statements includes:

k) Balance sheet;

l) Income statement;

m) A statement showing either all changes in equity; or changes in equity other than

those arising from capital transactions with owners and distributions to owners;

n) Cash flow statements; and

o) Accounting policies and explanatory notes.

Page 192: Bbm4101 Company Law

192

14.6 Communications with shareholders

a) Convening Meetings

b) Shareholder meetings shall be convened at least 21 clear days before such

meeting is held. Notices shall specify the place , date , hour and agenda of the

meeting.

c) The issuer will ensure that all the necessary facilities and information are

available to enable holders of its securities to exercise their rights. In

particular it shall:

d) Inform securities holders, meetings which they are entitled to attend;

e) Where applicable, enable them to exercise their voting rights; and

f) Publish notices or distribute circulars giving information on:

g) The allocation and payment of dividends and interest;

h) The issue of new securities, including arrangements for the allotment,

subscription, renunciation, conversion or exchange of the securities; and

i) Redemption or repayment of the securities.

j) Convening Meetings

k) If a circular is issued to the holders of any particular class of security, the

issuer shall issue a copy or summary of the same to the holders of all other

listed securities.

l) The issuer shall forward to the Securities Exchange and the Authority copies

of:

m) all circulars, notices, reports, announcements or other documents at the same

time as they are issued; and

n) All resolutions passed by the Issuer other than resolutions concerning ordinary

business at an AGM without delay after the relevant general meeting.

14.7 Responsibilities of a listed institution

a) Once on the Official List, the institution has a number of

responsibilities which can broadly be classified into:

b) Disclosure;

Page 193: Bbm4101 Company Law

193

c) Corporate governance;

d) Investor relations.

e) Competence and suitability of directors and management :

f) Suitable senior management with relevant experience for at least 1

year prior to listing.

g) No change of management for a period of 12 months following the

listing other than for reason of a serious offence that may be

considered to affect the integrity or be inappropriate for management

of a listed company.

h) At least a third of the Board as non executive directors.

i) Every issuer shall establish an Audit Committee and comply with

guidelines on corporate governance issued by the Authority.

j) There should also be public disclosure in respect of any management

or business agreements entered into between the Issuer and its local or

foreign associated and related companies, which may result in a

conflict-of-interest situation

14.8 Role of the Capital Markets Authority

Pursuant to its mission, the CMA is guided by the following objectives:

a) Facilitate the creation of incentives for and the removal of impediments to long-

term investments in productive activities.

b) Facilitate the existence of a market in which securities can be traded in an orderly,

fair and efficient manner, and ensure participation of the general public.

c) Protect investors from financial loss arising from failure of a broker or dealer to

meet his contractual obligations through a guarantee embodied in the

compensation fund.

d) Develop a framework through which electronic commerce may be used for the

development of capital markets in Kenya.

e) Develop new financial products to diversify the market and attract investors.

f) Facilitating the training and education of investors and other market participants.

g) Participate in the integration of the East African capital market.

Page 194: Bbm4101 Company Law

194

h) Develop a legal and regulatory framework for the market. In this regard, the CMA

has formulated the following rules and regulations:

i. Capital Markets (Licensing Requirements) (General) Regulations, 2002

ii. Capital Markets (Securities) (Public Offers, Listing and Disclosure)

Regulations, 2002

iii. Capital Markets (Takeovers and Mergers) Regulations

iv. Capital Markets Authority, Foreign Investor Regulations, 2002

v. Capital Markets Authority Fees Structure

vi. Collective Investment Schemes Regulations, 2001

vii. Corporate Governance Guidelines, 2002

viii. Rating Agency Guidelines, 2001

Summary for the topic

The reasons for listing in the stock exchange

The major benefits of listing at the stock exchange

The Nairobi stock exchange market segments

Listing requirements at the Nairobi stock exchange general eligibility

requirements for public offering of shares and listing

The responsibilities of a listed institution

The role of the capital markets authority

Page 195: Bbm4101 Company Law

195

Revision Questions

a) List the reasons for listing in the stock exchange

b) Explain the major benefits of listing at the stock exchange

c) Describe the Nairobi stock exchange market segments

d) List down listing requirements at the Nairobi stock exchange general

eligibility requirements for public offering of shares and listing

e) Explain the responsibilities of a listed institution

f) Describe the role of the capital markets authority

Text Books For Further Reading

Ogolla J.J, Gitau. R (2010) Company Law, Focus Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya. Pages 87-

91

Saleemi.N.A (1997) Company Law Simplified, N.A Saleemi Publishers Limited, Nairobi,

Kenya. Pages 94-109

Page 196: Bbm4101 Company Law

196